โ† All Watson-Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal Flashcard Decks

Identifying Logical Fallacies Questions and Answers Flashcards

7 cards from real Watson-Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal practice questions. Tap to flip, then mark Knew It or Still Learning โ€” missed cards come back until you master them.

Read the first 7 Identifying Logical Fallacies Questions and Answers flashcards as text
  1. A debater claims: 'My opponent's plan to reduce taxes is just a way to help the rich get richer.' The opponent actually proposed a targeted tax credit for low-income earners. Which fallacy is this?

    Answer: Straw man

    The straw man fallacy misrepresents an opponent's position to make it easier to attack.

  2. A company's CEO says: 'Since every part of our manufacturing process is efficient, our entire factory must be the most efficient in the industry.' This commits the:

    Answer: Composition fallacy

    The composition fallacy incorrectly assumes that what is true of parts must be true of the whole.

  3. A reviewer writes: 'Since this novel won a prestigious award, it must be well-written and enjoyable for all readers.' Which fallacy does this commit?

    Answer: Appeal to authority

    Appeal to authority incorrectly uses an expert judgment (award committee) as definitive proof for a subjective universal claim.

  4. 'Many people believe that working hard guarantees success, so it must be true.' This is an example of:

    Answer: Bandwagon fallacy (argumentum ad populum)

    The bandwagon fallacy treats widespread belief as evidence of truth, regardless of actual supporting evidence.

  5. During a debate on climate policy, a senator changes the subject to argue about the country's economic growth record. This tactic is known as:

    Answer: Red herring

    A red herring introduces an irrelevant topic to divert attention from the original argument.

  6. Argument: 'The Bible is true because it says so in the Bible.' This reasoning illustrates:

    Answer: Circular reasoning (begging the question)

    Circular reasoning (petitio principii) uses the conclusion as a premise to support itself, providing no independent evidence.

  7. A philosophy student argues that since each page of a textbook is easy to read, the entire textbook can be read in minutes. This best illustrates the:

    Answer: Composition fallacy

    The composition fallacy wrongly infers that a property of individual parts (each page being quick to read) applies to the whole.