← All Watson-Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal Flashcard Decks

Distinguishing Facts from Inferences Flashcards

7 cards from real Watson-Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal practice questions. Tap to flip, then mark Knew It or Still Learning — missed cards come back until you master them.

Read the first 7 Distinguishing Facts from Inferences flashcards as text
  1. A report states: 'The factory released 200 tons of carbon dioxide last year.' Which response best classifies this statement?

    Answer: It is a fact because it contains a specific measurable figure.

    A specific, measurable claim based on observable data qualifies as a factual statement.

  2. A student says, 'Because it rained every day this week, it will probably rain tomorrow.' This statement is best described as:

    Answer: An inference drawn from a pattern of observations.

    Drawing a conclusion about the future based on past observations is an inference, not an established fact.

  3. Which of the following is a statement of FACT rather than inference?

    Answer: The survey collected responses from 1,400 participants.

    The number of survey respondents is a directly verifiable, observable datum.

  4. A manager concludes: 'Sales dropped 15% last quarter, so our marketing strategy must be failing.' The phrase 'must be failing' represents:

    Answer: An inference because other causes could explain the drop.

    Attributing the drop specifically to marketing failure goes beyond what the sales data alone establishes.

  5. Passage: 'The bridge was built in 1952 and has never been closed for repairs.' A reader concludes, 'The bridge is structurally sound.' This conclusion is:

    Answer: An inference that may or may not be true.

    The absence of repairs does not confirm structural soundness; the conclusion goes beyond what the passage states.

  6. Which feature most reliably identifies a statement as an INFERENCE rather than a fact?

    Answer: It predicts, interprets, or explains beyond observed data.

    Inferences extend beyond the observed evidence to predict, interpret, or explain, making them unverifiable through direct observation alone.

  7. A headline reads: 'City council voted 7-2 to approve the new zoning law.' A reader concludes, 'The majority of residents support the zoning change.' This conclusion is:

    Answer: An inference because a council vote does not represent all residents.

    Council votes reflect elected representatives' decisions, not necessarily the views of the broader resident population.