TSI Writing Practice Test #3 3 Flashcards
6 cards from real TSI practice questions. Tap to flip, then mark Knew It or Still Learning — missed cards come back until you master them.
Read the first 6 TSI Writing Practice Test #3 3 flashcards as text
Which version of the sentence uses the most precise verb?
Answer: The scientist discovered a previously unknown species of deep-sea fish.
"Discovered" is the most precise and formal verb in this scientific context. "Found" is acceptable but less precise; "got" and "came across" are informal and vague.
Identify the run-on sentence.
Answer: The concert was sold out we waited in line for hours hoping for cancellations.
Option A fuses two independent clauses with no punctuation or conjunction — a classic run-on sentence. Options B, C, and D all correctly connect the clauses.
A student writes: "There are many different types of renewable energy sources available today." How could this sentence be revised for conciseness?
Answer: Many renewable energy sources are available today.
"There are" constructions are often wordy. Removing "there are" and restructuring gives a tighter, more direct sentence without losing meaning.
Which sentence uses capitalization correctly?
Answer: She studied biology at the University of Texas at Austin.
Academic subjects are not capitalized unless they are languages or proper nouns (e.g., English, French). "Biology" as a general subject is lowercase. "University of Texas at Austin" is a proper noun and is capitalized.
Which revision best improves the weak conclusion: "In conclusion, I have discussed three reasons why public transportation is important. I hope you agree."
Answer: Investing in public transportation reduces emissions, eases congestion, and connects communities — benefits that make it essential to the future of our cities.
A strong conclusion synthesizes the argument rather than merely announcing what was discussed. Option A restates the key points and closes with a forward-looking, persuasive statement — eliminating "I hope you agree" and "In conclusion."
A writer uses the phrase "each and every" in an academic essay. What is wrong with this phrase?
Answer: It is redundant — "each" and "every" mean the same thing; only one is needed
"Each" and "every" are synonymous in this context. Using both is redundant. Academic writing values conciseness, so "each" or "every" alone is preferred.