โ† All TMU Flashcard Decks

Critical Analysis Flashcards

7 cards from real TMU practice questions. Tap to flip, then mark Knew It or Still Learning โ€” missed cards come back until you master them.

Read the first 7 Critical Analysis flashcards as text
  1. Which of the following best exemplifies an appeal to emotion rather than logic?

    Answer: Showing images of suffering children to advocate for a charity without addressing program effectiveness

    Appeals to emotion bypass rational evaluation by triggering feelings instead of presenting evidence.

  2. A text argues from a specific case to a broader principle. This mode of reasoning is called:

    Answer: Inductive

    Inductive reasoning moves from specific observations to general conclusions.

  3. When two concepts are used interchangeably in an argument despite having different meanings, the fallacy is called:

    Answer: Equivocation

    Equivocation exploits the ambiguity of a word by shifting its meaning within the same argument.

  4. A critical analysis passage asks you to evaluate the credibility of a source. Which factor is LEAST relevant?

    Answer: Whether the author writes in a confident tone

    Confidence of tone does not indicate reliability; credibility depends on expertise, peer review, and transparency about bias.

  5. Which statement is a value judgment rather than a factual claim?

    Answer: Renewable energy is the most responsible path forward for society

    Statements about what is 'responsible' or 'best' express values and cannot be verified purely by empirical data.

  6. A student reads two arguments about urban development: one by a city planner and one by a real estate developer. To think critically, the student should:

    Answer: Evaluate both arguments' evidence and consider each author's potential interests

    Critical thinking requires evaluating the quality of evidence and acknowledging potential conflicts of interest in all sources.

  7. In the following argument: 'No one has ever proven that ghosts don't exist, so they must exist,' the fallacy is:

    Answer: Appeal to ignorance

    Appeal to ignorance treats absence of disproof as proof of the positive claim.