SQE1 — Solicitors Qualifying Examination Part 1 — Questions and Answers

Question 1: What is the SRA's power to intervene in a law firm?

The SRA can intervene to close a firm, take control of client files, and redirect client money to protect the public (Correct answer)
The SRA can only issue written warnings
The SRA can only issue fines up to £500
The SRA can only refer matters to the police

Correct answer: The SRA can intervene to close a firm, take control of client files, and redirect client money to protect the public

The SRA has extensive intervention powers including the ability to close a firm, freeze client accounts, take possession of documents and files, and redirect clients' matters to other firms. These powers are used to protect clients and the public interest.

Question 2: A law firm is instructed by both the buyer and the lender in a standard residential mortgage transaction. The lender's instructions state that the property must have been built at least 10 years ago. The solicitor discovers from the property searches that the house was completed only 8 years ago. Which of the following statements best describes the solicitor's position?

The solicitor must inform the lender but maintain confidentiality towards the buyer.
The solicitor can continue to act for both parties after obtaining written consent from each of them.
The solicitor must inform the buyer but maintain confidentiality towards the lender.
The solicitor must cease to act for both the buyer and the lender due to a conflict of interest. (Correct answer)

Correct answer: The solicitor must cease to act for both the buyer and the lender due to a conflict of interest.

A conflict of interest has arisen because the solicitor has a duty to disclose the property's age to the lender (as it is material to their instructions) and also a duty of confidentiality to the buyer regarding their transaction. These duties are in direct conflict. Under paragraph 6.2 of the SRA Code of Conduct, a solicitor cannot act where there is a client conflict, or a significant risk of one. The limited exceptions where a solicitor can act for two or more clients are not applicable here because the clients' interests on this material point are not aligned. Therefore, the solicitor must cease acting for both parties to avoid breaching their duties.

Question 3: Which body is responsible for investigating complaints of maladministration by government departments in the UK?

The Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman (Correct answer)
The Supreme Court
The Administrative Court
The Privy Council

Correct answer: The Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman

The Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman (PHSO) investigates complaints about maladministration by government departments and certain public bodies, as well as complaints about NHS services in England.

Question 4: A private limited company has adopted the Model Articles of Association without amendment. The company has three directors. Two of the directors attend a board meeting to vote on a substantial property transaction. One of the attending directors is also a majority shareholder in the company selling the property. What is the legal position regarding the board meeting's quorum?

The meeting is not quorate because the interested director cannot be counted for the quorum on this matter. (Correct answer)
The meeting is quorate, but any resolution passed is voidable at the option of the company.
The meeting is quorate as two directors are physically present, which satisfies the Model Articles.
The meeting is only quorate if the interested director declares their interest and the other director agrees to proceed.

Correct answer: The meeting is not quorate because the interested director cannot be counted for the quorum on this matter.

Under the Model Articles for private companies (Article 11(2)), the quorum for a directors' meeting is two, unless otherwise fixed. However, Article 14(1) states that a director who has a direct or indirect interest in a proposed transaction with the company is not to be counted in the quorum for that specific resolution. As one of the two attending directors has a conflict of interest, only one director can be counted towards the quorum for this matter, which is insufficient to meet the minimum requirement of two. Therefore, the meeting is not quorate for this specific item of business.

Question 5: What is the difference between 'murder' and 'manslaughter' in English criminal law?

Murder carries a mandatory life sentence; manslaughter carries a maximum of 5 years
Murder requires an intention to kill or cause GBH; manslaughter lacks this mens rea (voluntary manslaughter has a partial defence; involuntary is an unlawful/dangerous act or gross negligence) (Correct answer)
Manslaughter is only relevant for corporate defendants
Murder always involves premeditation; manslaughter is always accidental

Correct answer: Murder requires an intention to kill or cause GBH; manslaughter lacks this mens rea (voluntary manslaughter has a partial defence; involuntary is an unlawful/dangerous act or gross negligence)

Murder = unlawful killing with malice aforethought (intent to kill or cause GBH). Voluntary manslaughter = murder with a partial defence (loss of control or diminished responsibility), reducing to manslaughter. Involuntary manslaughter = unlawful act manslaughter or gross negligence manslaughter, without the murder mens rea.

Question 6: A clause in a commercial contract excludes all liability for negligence. Under the Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977 (UCTA), such a clause between two businesses is:

Always valid between commercial parties
Always void and unenforceable
Valid only if it satisfies the reasonableness test (Correct answer)
Valid only if agreed by a court in advance

Correct answer: Valid only if it satisfies the reasonableness test

Under UCTA 1977 (s.2(2)), a clause excluding liability for negligence causing loss other than death or personal injury between business parties is valid only if it satisfies the reasonableness test. Exclusion of liability for death or personal injury caused by negligence is always void (s.2(1)).

Question 7: Under the SRA Code of Conduct 2019, which of the following is a solicitor's duty relating to the court?

To win every case regardless of the means used
Not to mislead the court and to ensure the court can fulfil its overriding objective (Correct answer)
To conduct advocacy only in the solicitor's best financial interest
To disclose confidential client information if it assists the court

Correct answer: Not to mislead the court and to ensure the court can fulfil its overriding objective

The SRA Code of Conduct requires solicitors to uphold the rule of law and proper administration of justice, including a duty not to mislead the court by acts or omissions and to behave in a way that maintains the trust the public places in the profession and in the justice system.

Question 8: What is the primary test used in English negligence law to determine whether a defendant has breached their duty of care?

Whether the defendant was insured at the time
Whether the defendant intended harm
Whether the defendant fell below the standard of the reasonable person (the Bolam test for professionals) (Correct answer)
Whether any damage resulted, however minor

Correct answer: Whether the defendant fell below the standard of the reasonable person (the Bolam test for professionals)

The standard for breach of duty in negligence is the objective reasonable person standard. For professionals, the Bolam test applies: a professional is not negligent if they acted in accordance with a practice accepted as proper by a responsible body of professional opinion.

Question 9: In the tort of negligence, what must a claimant prove regarding causation?

That the damage was the only possible outcome
That the defendant was aware of the specific risk
That the defendant's breach of duty was the factual and legal cause of the damage (Correct answer)
That the defendant intended to cause harm

Correct answer: That the defendant's breach of duty was the factual and legal cause of the damage

A claimant must prove both factual causation (the 'but for' test — but for the defendant's breach, the damage would not have occurred) and legal causation (the damage was not too remote).

Question 10: Under the SRA Standards and Regulations 2019, what are the two Codes of Conduct that solicitors must comply with?

The Legal Services Act Code and the SRA Handbook
The Bar Standards Board Code and the Law Society Code
The SRA Principles and the SRA Accounts Rules
The SRA Code of Conduct for Firms and the SRA Code of Conduct for Individuals (Correct answer)

Correct answer: The SRA Code of Conduct for Firms and the SRA Code of Conduct for Individuals

The SRA Standards and Regulations 2019 include two separate Codes of Conduct: the SRA Code of Conduct for Solicitors, RELs and RFLs (for individuals) and the SRA Code of Conduct for Firms. Both apply cumulatively to solicitors working in authorised firms.

Question 11: Under the Companies Act 2006, what is the minimum number of directors required for a private limited company?

One (Correct answer)
Two
None
Three

Correct answer: One

Under s.154 of the Companies Act 2006, a private limited company must have at least one director. A public limited company must have at least two directors.

Question 12: What is the limitation period for a personal injury claim in negligence under English law?

3 years from the date of injury or date of knowledge (Correct answer)
1 year from the date of injury
12 months from the date the claim form is issued
6 years from the date of injury

Correct answer: 3 years from the date of injury or date of knowledge

Under the Limitation Act 1980 (section 11), the limitation period for personal injury claims is 3 years from the date of the injury or the date of knowledge (when the claimant first knew they had a claim), whichever is later.

Question 13: A Quistclose trust (Barclays Bank Ltd v Quistclose Investments Ltd [1970]) arises in which of the following circumstances?

A company becomes insolvent with insufficient assets to pay creditors
Money is lent for a specific purpose and that purpose fails, leaving it on resulting trust for the lender (Correct answer)
A trustee misappropriates trust funds and mixes them with personal assets
A bank retains money in a suspense account pending verification

Correct answer: Money is lent for a specific purpose and that purpose fails, leaving it on resulting trust for the lender

A Quistclose trust arises where money is advanced for a specific purpose; if that purpose fails or cannot be carried out, the money is held on resulting trust for the lender rather than being available to general creditors.

Question 14: A solicitor is instructed by a new client to handle the purchase of a residential property. The client is providing the funds from a recent inheritance. The solicitor has concerns that the client appears frail and does not fully understand the transaction, and the client's adult child is present at all meetings and answers most questions on their behalf. Which SRA Principle is most directly engaged by the solicitor's need to ensure they are acting on valid instructions?

Principle 5: Act with integrity.
Principle 7: Act in the best interests of each client. (Correct answer)
Principle 4: Act with honesty.
Principle 2: Act in a way that upholds public trust and confidence.

Correct answer: Principle 7: Act in the best interests of each client.

Principle 7 requires a solicitor to act in the best interests of each client. This includes satisfying themselves that the client has the capacity to give instructions and that the instructions are their own, free from undue influence. While the other principles are important, the immediate ethical challenge is ensuring the actions taken are genuinely for the client's benefit and reflect their true wishes, which is the core of acting in their best interests. The SRA has issued specific guidance on accepting instructions from vulnerable clients which relates directly to this principle.

Question 15: Under the Constitutional Reform Act 2005, what major structural change was made to the UK judiciary?

The Supreme Court of the United Kingdom was established as the final court of appeal (Correct answer)
The Lord Chancellor was given additional judicial powers
The House of Lords was abolished
The European Court of Justice became the final appellate court

Correct answer: The Supreme Court of the United Kingdom was established as the final court of appeal

The Constitutional Reform Act 2005 established the UK Supreme Court, which replaced the Appellate Committee of the House of Lords as the highest court of appeal. It also reformed the role of the Lord Chancellor and established the Judicial Appointments Commission.

Question 16: In the tort of negligence, what three elements must a claimant establish to succeed?

Duty of care, breach of duty, causation of damage (Correct answer)
Offer, acceptance, and consideration
Foreseeability, malice, and damage
Intention, breach of statute, loss

Correct answer: Duty of care, breach of duty, causation of damage

To succeed in negligence, a claimant must prove: (1) the defendant owed them a duty of care; (2) the defendant breached that duty; and (3) the breach caused the claimant's damage, which must not be too remote.

Question 17: Which of the following is explicitly defined as 'client money' under the SRA Accounts Rules?

Money held by the firm to pay for its own general office running costs.
Money received from a client on account of costs and unpaid disbursements, before a bill has been delivered. (Correct answer)
Money received from a client specifically for a bill that has already been delivered.
A loan provided to the firm by one of its partners.

Correct answer: Money received from a client on account of costs and unpaid disbursements, before a bill has been delivered.

SRA Accounts Rule 2.1(d) defines client money as including money held 'in respect of your fees and any unpaid disbursements if held or received prior to delivery of a bill for the same'. Once a bill has been delivered, money received for it becomes office money. Partner loans and money for office expenses are the firm's own business money, not client money.

Question 18: What is the overriding principle concerning the payment of interest on money held for a client in a general client account under the SRA Accounts Rules?

The firm is entitled to keep all interest earned to cover bank charges.
The firm must account to the client for a fair sum of interest. (Correct answer)
No interest needs to be paid unless the amount held exceeds £10,000.
Interest must always be paid at the official Bank of England base rate.

Correct answer: The firm must account to the client for a fair sum of interest.

SRA Accounts Rule 7.1 explicitly states that a firm must 'account to clients or third parties for a fair sum of interest on any client money held'. While a firm can have a written agreement with a client to the contrary, the default position is one of fairness. There is no specific monetary threshold or requirement to use the Bank of England base rate, but the policy must be fair and reasonable in the circumstances.

Question 19: A homeowner emails a local builder, 'I will pay you £20,000 to build a single-storey extension to my kitchen according to the attached plans. I need it finished by 1st October.' The builder replies by email, 'I accept your offer to build the extension for £20,000 based on the plans. My team can start in two weeks.' A binding contract is formed at which point?

When the builder begins the work.
When the homeowner sends the initial email.
When the builder's acceptance email is received by the homeowner. (Correct answer)
When the homeowner's email server sends the initial email.

Correct answer: When the builder's acceptance email is received by the homeowner.

For instantaneous methods of communication like email, the general rule of acceptance (the 'receipt rule') applies. The contract is formed when the acceptance is communicated to the offeror, which means when the acceptance email is received by the homeowner. The postal rule, where acceptance is effective on posting, does not apply to instantaneous communications (Entores Ltd v Miles Far East Corporation). Sending the initial email is just an offer, and starting the work would be conduct indicating acceptance, but the communicated acceptance via email forms the contract at the point of receipt.

Question 20: In civil litigation, what is the purpose of a 'Part 36 offer' under the Civil Procedure Rules?

An offer to mediate made before proceedings are issued
An offer by either party to settle that carries costs consequences if rejected and not beaten at trial (Correct answer)
A formal notice of discontinuance of proceedings
An application for summary judgment without a full trial

Correct answer: An offer by either party to settle that carries costs consequences if rejected and not beaten at trial

A Part 36 offer (CPR Part 36) is a formal settlement offer with specific costs consequences. If a claimant fails to beat a defendant's Part 36 offer at trial, they usually pay the defendant's costs from the date of expiry of the offer. If a claimant's Part 36 offer is not beaten, the defendant faces enhanced consequences.

Question 21: What is the purpose of the SRA Accounts Rules regarding client money?

To allow solicitors to use client money for office expenses temporarily
To ensure solicitors invest client money for maximum returns
To regulate the fees solicitors can charge
To ensure client money is kept separate from the firm's own money and properly safeguarded (Correct answer)

Correct answer: To ensure client money is kept separate from the firm's own money and properly safeguarded

The SRA Accounts Rules require that client money is kept separate from the firm's money in a designated client account. This protects client funds from being mixed with the firm's finances and ensures they are available when needed.

Question 22: Which constitutional principle holds that Parliament can make or unmake any law and no body can override or set aside an Act of Parliament?

Judicial independence
Parliamentary sovereignty (Correct answer)
Separation of powers
The rule of law

Correct answer: Parliamentary sovereignty

Parliamentary sovereignty, as described by Dicey, means Parliament has the right to make or unmake any law, and no person or body has the right to override or set aside legislation. It is the cornerstone of the UK constitution.

Question 23: What is a 'partnership' under the Partnership Act 1890?

The relation which subsists between persons carrying on a business in common with a view of profit (Correct answer)
Two or more employees working together in an organisation
A company registered at Companies House with limited liability
A formal agreement requiring written incorporation documents

Correct answer: The relation which subsists between persons carrying on a business in common with a view of profit

Under s.1(1) of the Partnership Act 1890, a partnership is 'the relation which subsists between persons carrying on a business in common with a view of profit'. It requires no formal registration and can be created informally.

Question 24: A mother provides the full £300,000 purchase price for a house, but for administrative convenience, the legal title is registered in the sole name of her adult son. There is no mention of a loan or gift. A decade later, the mother and son fall out, and the son claims the house is his absolutely. In the absence of any other evidence, what type of trust is most likely to have arisen?

A presumed resulting trust, with the son holding the property on trust for his mother. (Correct answer)
A constructive trust, because it would be unconscionable for the son to deny his mother's interest.
An express trust, as the mother expressed her intention through the payment.
A statutory trust under the Trusts of Land and Appointment of Trustees Act 1996.

Correct answer: A presumed resulting trust, with the son holding the property on trust for his mother.

Where a person provides the purchase money for a property which is then placed in the name of another, equity presumes that the person holding the legal title holds it on a resulting trust for the person who provided the funds (*Dyer v Dyer*). This presumption can be rebutted by evidence of a gift or loan, or by the presumption of advancement (e.g., from father to child), but the presumption of advancement is weaker from mother to child and can be rebutted by evidence showing an intention to retain an interest. Given the facts, a presumed resulting trust is the most likely outcome.

Question 25: What is the 'cab rank rule' in the context of professional conduct and to which branch of the legal profession does it primarily apply?

A barrister's obligation to accept any brief in their field of practice at a proper professional fee, unless specific permitted exceptions apply — it does not apply to solicitors (Correct answer)
A solicitor's obligation to accept any client who attends their office
A rule preventing solicitors from refusing legal aid clients
A rule requiring all lawyers to offer pro bono services

Correct answer: A barrister's obligation to accept any brief in their field of practice at a proper professional fee, unless specific permitted exceptions apply — it does not apply to solicitors

The cab rank rule applies to barristers (under the Bar Standards Board Code) and requires them to accept any brief within their field of practice at a proper fee, unless specific exceptions apply (e.g., conflict of interest, capacity). It does not apply to solicitors, who have greater freedom to decline instructions.

Question 26: Under English law, what is an 'unfair prejudice petition' under the Companies Act 2006?

A criminal prosecution of a company director for fraud
A remedy for minority shareholders who allege the company's affairs have been or are being conducted in a manner unfairly prejudicial to their interests (Correct answer)
A petition to wind up a company because it cannot pay its debts
A challenge to the validity of a share issue

Correct answer: A remedy for minority shareholders who allege the company's affairs have been or are being conducted in a manner unfairly prejudicial to their interests

Under s.994 of the Companies Act 2006, a shareholder may petition the court on the grounds that the company's affairs are being conducted in a manner unfairly prejudicial to their interests. The court may grant a wide range of remedies, most commonly ordering the purchase of the petitioner's shares.

Question 27: What is 'joint and several liability' in the context of tort law?

Where multiple defendants are each fully liable for the entire loss, and the claimant can recover in full from any one of them (Correct answer)
Where defendants are each only liable for their proportionate share of the loss
Where liability is shared equally between the claimant and defendant
Where defendants are liable only if sued together in the same action

Correct answer: Where multiple defendants are each fully liable for the entire loss, and the claimant can recover in full from any one of them

Joint and several liability means each defendant is fully liable for the entire loss. The claimant can recover the full amount from any one defendant (or combination), leaving the defendants to sort out contribution between themselves.

Question 28: Under English criminal law, what are the two elements that must generally be proved to establish criminal liability?

Harm and recklessness
Causation and intent
Actus reus and mens rea (Correct answer)
Motive and opportunity

Correct answer: Actus reus and mens rea

Criminal liability generally requires proof of both the actus reus (the guilty act or conduct) and the mens rea (the guilty mind or mental element). This fundamental principle is expressed in the maxim 'actus non facit reum nisi mens sit rea'.

Question 29: Which case established that an advertisement for a product (such as the Carbolic Smoke Ball) could constitute a binding unilateral offer?

Partridge v Crittenden [1968]
Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Co [1893] (Correct answer)
Hyde v Wrench [1840]
Fisher v Bell [1961]

Correct answer: Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Co [1893]

Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Co [1893] established that an advertisement can be a unilateral offer to the world capable of acceptance by performance, making the company bound to pay the reward.

Question 30: What is a 'restrictive covenant' in land law and how does it bind successors in title?

A positive obligation to do something on land, binding all subsequent owners automatically
An agreement between neighbours that is purely personal and does not bind successors
A negative obligation restricting use of land that runs with the burdened land in equity if certain conditions are met (Correct answer)
A planning permission condition imposed by the local authority

Correct answer: A negative obligation restricting use of land that runs with the burdened land in equity if certain conditions are met

A restrictive covenant is a negative obligation (e.g., not to build) that runs with the land in equity. Under the rule in Tulk v Moxhay [1848], it binds successors if it is negative in nature, benefits dominant land, and the successor took the burdened land with notice of it.

Question 31: What is the legal effect of a counter-offer on the original offer?

It automatically becomes the binding contract
It requires the original offeror to accept or reject in writing
It suspends but does not terminate the original offer
It terminates the original offer, which cannot then be accepted (Correct answer)

Correct answer: It terminates the original offer, which cannot then be accepted

A counter-offer terminates the original offer (Hyde v Wrench [1840]). The original offer cannot subsequently be accepted; the counter-offer itself becomes the new offer which the original offeror may accept or reject.

Question 32: A defendant appears before a magistrates' court charged with assault occasioning actual bodily harm (ABH) under s.47 of the Offences Against the Person Act 1861. This is an either-way offence. The magistrates consider the case and decide that their sentencing powers would be sufficient if the defendant were to be convicted. What is the next step in the allocation procedure?

The defendant is informed that the magistrates have accepted jurisdiction and is then asked whether they consent to be tried in the magistrates' court or wish to elect for trial by jury at the Crown Court. (Correct answer)
The case is automatically sent to the Crown Court for a plea and trial preparation hearing.
The prosecution is asked to confirm whether they agree with the magistrates' decision to retain jurisdiction.
The defendant is asked to enter a plea, and if they plead not guilty, the trial will proceed in the magistrates' court.

Correct answer: The defendant is informed that the magistrates have accepted jurisdiction and is then asked whether they consent to be tried in the magistrates' court or wish to elect for trial by jury at the Crown Court.

In the allocation (or 'mode of trial') procedure for an either-way offence, if the magistrates accept jurisdiction, the next crucial step is to put the choice to the defendant. The court clerk will explain that the defendant can either consent to a summary trial in the magistrates' court or elect to be tried by a jury in the Crown Court. The defendant's right to elect for a jury trial is a fundamental aspect of the procedure. The plea is taken only after the issue of venue has been settled.

Question 33: In Lloyds Bank plc v Rosset [1991], Lord Bridge identified two bases on which a common intention constructive trust can arise. Which answer correctly states both?

Written agreement, or registered interest at the Land Registry
Express common intention plus detrimental reliance, or direct financial contributions to the purchase price implying common intention (Correct answer)
Express declaration of trust, or conduct after acquisition of the property
Financial contributions at any stage, or unilateral declarations by one party

Correct answer: Express common intention plus detrimental reliance, or direct financial contributions to the purchase price implying common intention

Lord Bridge held that a common intention constructive trust arises either from an express common intention accompanied by detrimental reliance, or from direct financial contributions to the purchase price which imply a common intention.

Question 34: A law firm concludes a matter and has £25 remaining in the client ledger. For 18 months, the firm has made reasonable, documented attempts to trace the client to return the funds, without success. According to the SRA Accounts Rules, what is the most appropriate action for the firm to take?

Transfer the £25 to the business account to cover the administration costs of the tracing attempts.
Send a cheque for £25 to the Solicitors Regulation Authority.
Pay the £25 to a registered charity of the firm's choice. (Correct answer)
Keep the money in the client account indefinitely until the client makes contact.

Correct answer: Pay the £25 to a registered charity of the firm's choice.

Under Rule 5.1(c) and the SRA's prescribed circumstances, if a residual client balance is £500 or less, and the firm has taken reasonable steps to return the money to the rightful owner, the firm can pay the money to a charity. The firm must record the steps taken and cannot deduct its own costs from the amount. Keeping the money indefinitely or transferring it to the business account would be a breach of the rules.

Question 35: For over 25 years, a farmer has openly driven his tractor along a track across his neighbour's field to access a main road. This has been done without the neighbour's permission, without using force, and without secrecy. The neighbour has recently blocked the track with a fence. On what grounds is the farmer most likely to succeed in claiming a legal right of way?

Prescription under the Prescription Act 1832. (Correct answer)
Proprietary estoppel.
Express grant in the title deeds.
Implied easement of necessity.

Correct answer: Prescription under the Prescription Act 1832.

The farmer's long and continuous use (over 20 years) that is 'as of right' (without force, secrecy, or permission) meets the criteria for acquiring an easement by prescription. Specifically, section 2 of the Prescription Act 1832 establishes a right of way after 20 years of uninterrupted use. An easement of necessity would not apply unless the farmer's land was entirely landlocked, there is no evidence of an express grant, and proprietary estoppel would require a representation or assurance from the neighbour which is not mentioned.

Question 36: Under the Trusts of Land and Appointment of Trustees Act 1996 (TOLATA), when can a co-owner apply to the court for an order for sale of co-owned land?

Only if the property is mortgaged
Only when all co-owners agree to sell
Only on the death of one of the co-owners
Any trustee or person with an interest in the land may apply to the court for an order relating to the exercise of the trustees' functions, including an order for sale (Correct answer)

Correct answer: Any trustee or person with an interest in the land may apply to the court for an order relating to the exercise of the trustees' functions, including an order for sale

Under s.14 of TOLATA 1996, any trustee or person with an interest in the trust property (including beneficiaries) may apply to court for an order relating to the exercise of trustees' functions. The court has wide discretion and considers s.15 factors.

Question 37: A testator's will contains the following clause: 'I give £200,000 to my trustees to distribute in their absolute discretion amongst my old friends'. Which of the three certainties required to form a valid express trust is most likely to fail in this disposition?

Certainty of intention, because the use of 'distribute in their absolute discretion' is precatory language.
Certainty of subject matter, because the amount of £200,000 is not segregated from the rest of the estate.
Certainty of objects, because the term 'old friends' is conceptually uncertain. (Correct answer)
Certainty of objects, because it is impossible to draw up a complete list of all the testator's 'old friends'.

Correct answer: Certainty of objects, because the term 'old friends' is conceptually uncertain.

For a discretionary trust to be valid, the test for certainty of objects is the 'is or is not' test established in *McPhail v Doulton*. This requires that it can be said with certainty whether any given individual is or is not a member of the class of beneficiaries. The term 'old friends' is considered conceptually uncertain because it is a subjective term with no objective definition, making it impossible for trustees to determine who would fall into the class. The other options are incorrect: the subject matter (£200,000) is certain; the language used shows a clear intention to create a trust, not just a moral obligation; and the 'complete list' test applies to fixed trusts, not discretionary trusts.

Question 38: What does the SRA Code of Conduct require regarding a solicitor's duty when acting for a client in litigation who informs the solicitor they have committed perjury in their evidence?

The solicitor cannot correct the position without the client's consent but cannot continue to act unless the client agrees to correct the record; if the client refuses, the solicitor must withdraw (Correct answer)
The solicitor must report the client to the police
The solicitor must immediately disclose this to the court
The solicitor should continue acting and ignore the admission

Correct answer: The solicitor cannot correct the position without the client's consent but cannot continue to act unless the client agrees to correct the record; if the client refuses, the solicitor must withdraw

If a client tells their solicitor they have committed perjury, the solicitor cannot disclose this (confidentiality) but equally cannot allow the misleading position to stand. The solicitor must advise the client to correct the record. If the client refuses, the solicitor must cease acting (without explaining why to the court).

Question 39: What is 'intestacy' and which Act governs the distribution of an estate in England and Wales when someone dies without a valid will?

Intestacy occurs when probate is refused; governed by the Inheritance Act 1975
Intestacy occurs when a person dies without a valid will; governed by the Administration of Estates Act 1925 (Correct answer)
Intestacy is governed by the Inheritance Tax Act 1984
Intestacy occurs when a will is contested; governed by the Wills Act 1837

Correct answer: Intestacy occurs when a person dies without a valid will; governed by the Administration of Estates Act 1925

Intestacy arises when a person dies wholly or partially without a valid will. The Administration of Estates Act 1925 (as amended by the Inheritance and Trustees' Powers Act 2014) sets out the statutory order of priority for distributing the estate (spouse, children, parents, etc.).

Question 40: What is the Caparo three-stage test for establishing a duty of care?

Causation, proximity, and reasonableness
Foreseeability of damage, proximity of relationship, and fairness/justness/reasonableness of imposing a duty (Correct answer)
Intention, breach, and damage
Offer, acceptance, and consideration

Correct answer: Foreseeability of damage, proximity of relationship, and fairness/justness/reasonableness of imposing a duty

The Caparo Industries plc v Dickman [1990] three-stage test requires: (1) the harm was reasonably foreseeable; (2) there was a relationship of proximity between the parties; and (3) it is fair, just, and reasonable to impose a duty.

Question 41: What is the legal test for 'dishonesty' applied in criminal law following the Supreme Court decision in Ivey v Genting Casinos UK Ltd [2017]?

An objective test only — would a reasonable person consider the conduct dishonest?
A two-stage test: what was the defendant's actual state of mind, and would reasonable, honest people consider that conduct dishonest? (Correct answer)
Dishonesty requires deliberate deception — negligence cannot be dishonest
A purely subjective test — was the defendant personally aware their conduct was dishonest?

Correct answer: A two-stage test: what was the defendant's actual state of mind, and would reasonable, honest people consider that conduct dishonest?

Ivey v Genting Casinos [2017] (SC) replaced the Ghosh test. The current test is: (1) what was the defendant's actual knowledge/belief about the facts? (2) Given those facts, would reasonable, honest people consider the conduct to have been dishonest? It removes the old second limb asking if the defendant knew their conduct was dishonest by that standard.

Question 42: Following the Supreme Court's decision in Ivey v Genting Casinos, which of the following correctly states the legal test for dishonesty in criminal law?

Did the defendant honestly believe their actions were not dishonest, regardless of what an ordinary person might think?
Was the defendant's conduct so outrageous that a jury would instinctively consider it to be dishonest?
What was the defendant's actual state of knowledge or belief as to the facts, and in light of that knowledge or belief, was their conduct dishonest by the standards of ordinary, decent people? (Correct answer)
Was the defendant's conduct dishonest by the standards of ordinary, reasonable and honest people, and did the defendant realise that ordinary people would regard their behaviour as dishonest?

Correct answer: What was the defendant's actual state of knowledge or belief as to the facts, and in light of that knowledge or belief, was their conduct dishonest by the standards of ordinary, decent people?

The Supreme Court in *Ivey v Genting Casinos* established a new two-stage test for dishonesty, effectively overruling the previous test from *R v Ghosh*. The correct test is: 1. What was the defendant's actual state of knowledge or belief as to the facts? (a subjective test). 2. In the context of that knowledge or belief, was their conduct dishonest by the standards of ordinary, decent people? (an objective test). The old *Ghosh* test included a second subjective limb asking whether the defendant realised others would find their actions dishonest, which has now been removed.

Question 43: Under the rule in Re Hallett's Estate (1880), where a trustee mixes trust money with their own funds in a bank account and subsequently makes withdrawals, how are those withdrawals treated?

At the court's discretion based on the trustee's stated intention
As drawn equally from trust and personal funds in proportion to each
As drawn from the trustee's own money first, leaving the trust money intact (Correct answer)
As drawn from the trust money first, maximising the personal fund

Correct answer: As drawn from the trustee's own money first, leaving the trust money intact

In Re Hallett's Estate, the court held that a trustee who withdraws money from a mixed account is presumed to have spent their own money first, thereby preserving the trust money for as long as the account balance permits.

Question 44: What are 'letters of administration' and when are they required in the administration of an estate?

They are required when a person dies intestate, or when a will exists but no executor is named or willing to act, granting authority to administer the estate (Correct answer)
They are required when a testator dies with a valid will naming an executor who is willing and able to act
They are granted by the testator during their lifetime
They are always required regardless of whether there is a will

Correct answer: They are required when a person dies intestate, or when a will exists but no executor is named or willing to act, granting authority to administer the estate

Letters of administration are granted by the Probate Registry to authorise a person (the administrator) to deal with a deceased's estate where the deceased died intestate, or where a will exists but no named executor is able or willing to act (in which case letters of administration with will annexed are granted).

Question 45: A man attacks another man in an alley, intending to cause him serious harm. Believing the victim to be dead, he panics and pushes the body into a nearby canal to dispose of it. A post-mortem examination reveals that the victim was merely unconscious after the initial attack and the actual cause of death was drowning. The defendant is charged with murder. On which legal principle is the prosecution most likely to rely to secure a conviction?

Strict liability
The thin skull rule
Transferred malice
The 'single transaction' doctrine (Correct answer)

Correct answer: The 'single transaction' doctrine

This scenario is analogous to the classic cases of *R v Thabo Meli* and *R v Church*. The 'single transaction' or 'continuing act' doctrine allows the court to treat a series of connected acts as one continuous event. The *mens rea* (intent to kill or cause serious harm) formed during the initial attack can be combined with the subsequent *actus reus* (the act that actually caused death, i.e., pushing the body into the canal), even though the defendant lacked the *mens rea* at that specific moment because he believed the victim was already dead. The series of acts is viewed as a single transaction.

Question 46: What is the maximum sentence for fraud by false representation under the Fraud Act 2006?

5 years' imprisonment
10 years' imprisonment (Correct answer)
2 years' imprisonment
Life imprisonment

Correct answer: 10 years' imprisonment

Section 1 of the Fraud Act 2006 provides for a maximum sentence of 10 years' imprisonment on conviction on indictment for fraud offences, including fraud by false representation (section 2).

Question 47: Under the Misrepresentation Act 1967, which type of misrepresentation allows the innocent party to claim both rescission and damages?

Innocent misrepresentation
Negligent misrepresentation under s.2(1)
Fraudulent misrepresentation
Both fraudulent and negligent misrepresentation under s.2(1) (Correct answer)

Correct answer: Both fraudulent and negligent misrepresentation under s.2(1)

Rescission is available for all types of misrepresentation. Damages can be claimed for fraudulent misrepresentation (under the tort of deceit) and under s.2(1) of the Misrepresentation Act 1967 for negligent misrepresentation. Innocent misrepresentation may only result in rescission or damages in lieu.

Question 48: Which of the following interests is most likely to be an 'overriding interest' under Schedule 3 of the Land Registration Act 2002, binding a purchaser for valuable consideration even though it is not protected by an entry on the register?

A restrictive covenant entered into by the seller last year.
An equitable mortgage created by the deposit of title deeds.
A legal lease for a term of five years, granted two months ago, under which the tenant is in possession. (Correct answer)
An estate contract to grant a lease for a term of ten years.

Correct answer: A legal lease for a term of five years, granted two months ago, under which the tenant is in possession.

Schedule 3, Paragraph 1 of the Land Registration Act 2002 provides that a legal leasehold estate granted for a term not exceeding seven years will be an overriding interest. A five-year legal lease falls into this category. The other options are interests that would require protection by a notice on the register to be binding on a purchaser.

Question 49: What is the role of the Legal Ombudsman in the UK legal services framework?

To prosecute solicitors for criminal conduct
To set the training requirements for solicitors
To investigate and resolve complaints about the service provided by lawyers (Correct answer)
To approve new law firms for practice

Correct answer: To investigate and resolve complaints about the service provided by lawyers

The Legal Ombudsman investigates and resolves complaints from consumers about the service they have received from regulated legal service providers. It focuses on service complaints rather than conduct issues, which are handled by the relevant regulator.

Question 50: Which remedy for breach of contract requires the breaching party to perform their contractual obligations?

Account of profits
Damages
Specific performance (Correct answer)
Rescission

Correct answer: Specific performance

Specific performance is an equitable remedy that orders the breaching party to perform their contractual obligations. It is typically granted for contracts involving unique goods or land, and is discretionary (not available as of right).

Question 51: Under the standard conveyancing process in England and Wales, at what point do the parties become legally bound to buy and sell a property?

When the buyer's solicitor conducts searches
On exchange of contracts (Correct answer)
On completion
When the seller accepts the buyer's offer verbally

Correct answer: On exchange of contracts

In England and Wales, parties become legally bound to the transaction only on exchange of contracts. Before exchange, either party can withdraw without legal liability. Completion is when title transfers and money is paid.

Question 52: In a claim for private nuisance, a court will assess whether the defendant's use of their land constitutes an 'unreasonable interference' with the claimant's enjoyment of their land. Which of the following factors is the court LEAST likely to consider relevant in this assessment?

The duration and frequency of the interference.
The character of the neighbourhood or 'locality'.
The financial resources of the defendant. (Correct answer)
Whether the defendant acted with malice.

Correct answer: The financial resources of the defendant.

When determining if an interference is unreasonable in private nuisance, courts consider several factors, including the locality (what is a nuisance in a quiet residential area may not be in an industrial one), the duration and frequency of the act, the sensitivity of the claimant, and the presence of malice on the part of the defendant. [28, 30] However, the defendant's financial resources or ability to pay damages is not a factor in determining whether their actions constitute a nuisance in the first place. The assessment is based on the nature and impact of the interference itself, not the defendant's wealth.

Question 53: A trustee is a chartered accountant managing a family trust. When exercising the general power of investment, what is the standard of care the trustee must exercise according to the Trustee Act 2000?

The same standard of care as a lay trustee, as the Act does not distinguish between professional and non-professional trustees.
The highest possible standard of care as he is a professional acting for a family.
Such care and skill as is reasonable in the circumstances, having regard to his professional knowledge as an accountant. (Correct answer)
The care an ordinary prudent man of business would take when managing his own affairs.

Correct answer: Such care and skill as is reasonable in the circumstances, having regard to his professional knowledge as an accountant.

Section 1 of the Trustee Act 2000 sets out the statutory duty of care. It requires a trustee to exercise 'such care and skill as is reasonable in the circumstances'. Crucially, it has both an objective and a subjective element. Regard must be had to (a) any special knowledge or experience the trustee has or holds themselves out as having, and (b) if acting in the course of a business or profession, any special knowledge or experience it is reasonable to expect of a person in that profession. As a chartered accountant, the trustee will be held to a higher standard reflecting that professional status.

Question 54: Where a trustee commits a breach of trust that causes loss to the trust fund, what is the primary remedy available to the beneficiaries?

A declaration that the trustee holds the assets on bare trust
An account of profits to strip the trustee of any gain
An injunction to restrain any future breach
Equitable compensation to restore the trust fund to the position it would have been in but for the breach (Correct answer)

Correct answer: Equitable compensation to restore the trust fund to the position it would have been in but for the breach

The primary remedy for a loss-causing breach of trust is equitable compensation, which is aimed at restoring the trust fund to its proper state rather than stripping gain or preventing future wrongdoing.

Question 55: In a personal injury claim, damages are often categorised as either general or special. Which of the following would be classified as special damages?

The cost of prescription medication and physiotherapy incurred up to the date of the trial. (Correct answer)
Compensation for the physical pain and suffering caused by the injury.
Compensation for the loss of enjoyment of a hobby, such as playing a sport.
Damages for the psychological impact, such as post-traumatic stress disorder.

Correct answer: The cost of prescription medication and physiotherapy incurred up to the date of the trial.

Special damages are awarded for a claimant's quantifiable financial losses that have been incurred up to the date of trial. [48] These are losses that can be precisely calculated, such as medical expenses, travel costs for appointments, and loss of past earnings. [29, 40] General damages, on the other hand, are for non-quantifiable losses like pain, suffering, loss of amenity (enjoyment of life), and psychological harm, which are assessed by the court based on judicial guidelines. [25, 47]

Question 56: Under the Consumer Rights Act 2015, what is the implied term regarding the quality of goods sold by a trader to a consumer?

Goods must match only their written description
Goods must be perfect in all respects
Goods must be of satisfactory quality (Correct answer)
Quality is at the trader's discretion

Correct answer: Goods must be of satisfactory quality

Section 9 of the Consumer Rights Act 2015 implies a term that goods must be of satisfactory quality — meaning the standard a reasonable person would consider satisfactory given the description, price, and all other relevant circumstances.

Question 57: What is a solicitor's duty of confidentiality under the SRA Code of Conduct?

Confidentiality only applies to information received in writing
The duty continues after the retainer ends and is subject to limited exceptions (Correct answer)
The duty is absolute and can never be overridden
Confidentiality applies only during the retainer and ends when the client relationship terminates

Correct answer: The duty continues after the retainer ends and is subject to limited exceptions

A solicitor's duty of confidentiality continues indefinitely, even after the client relationship ends. It is subject to limited exceptions, such as where disclosure is required by law or court order, or where the client gives informed consent.

Question 58: Under the Theft Act 1968, which element of theft requires that the defendant's appropriation be without legal right?

Dishonesty (Correct answer)
Intention to permanently deprive
Appropriation
Property
Belonging to another

Correct answer: Dishonesty

Dishonesty is the element that addresses whether the appropriation was without legal right. The test for dishonesty was reformulated in Ivey v Genting Casinos [2017], which replaced the two-stage Ghosh test with an objective assessment of the defendant's conduct.

Question 59: A solicitor gives a personal, oral undertaking to another solicitor over the telephone to 'pay their client's costs of £5,000 within 14 days'. The solicitor made the undertaking without first securing the funds from their own client. The 14 days have now passed, and the client has not provided the funds. What is the legal and professional status of the undertaking?

The undertaking is unenforceable because it was not given in writing.
The undertaking is not binding on the solicitor personally, only on their firm.
The undertaking is personally binding on the solicitor, who must perform it from their own funds if necessary. (Correct answer)
The undertaking is conditional on the solicitor receiving the funds from their client and is therefore currently suspended.

Correct answer: The undertaking is personally binding on the solicitor, who must perform it from their own funds if necessary.

Under paragraph 1.3 of the SRA Code of Conduct, solicitors must perform all undertakings given by them. An undertaking can be given orally or in writing and is personally binding on the solicitor who gives it. It is not conditional on receiving funds from a client unless explicitly stated as such. Therefore, the solicitor is personally liable to pay the £5,000, even if it has to come from their own resources. Failure to do so is professional misconduct.

Question 60: What is the legal position when a party claims frustration of a contract?

All obligations are suspended until the frustrating event passes
The party claiming frustration must pay the other party all anticipated profits
Frustration can only be claimed with three months' notice
The contract is automatically void from the moment of the frustrating event, and parties are discharged from future obligations (Correct answer)

Correct answer: The contract is automatically void from the moment of the frustrating event, and parties are discharged from future obligations

Under the doctrine of frustration, when a supervening event occurs that was not foreseeable, makes performance impossible or radically different, and was not self-induced, the contract is automatically void from that point and parties are discharged from future obligations.

Question 61: Under the Money Laundering Regulations 2017, what is a solicitor's obligation when they have knowledge or suspicion that a client is engaged in money laundering?

Report the suspicion only to the SRA, not the NCA
Inform the client they are suspected and give them a chance to explain
Submit a Suspicious Activity Report (SAR) to the National Crime Agency (NCA) and do not inform ('tip off') the client (Correct answer)
Immediately terminate the retainer without any report

Correct answer: Submit a Suspicious Activity Report (SAR) to the National Crime Agency (NCA) and do not inform ('tip off') the client

Under the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 and the Money Laundering Regulations 2017, a solicitor who suspects money laundering must submit a Suspicious Activity Report (SAR) to the National Crime Agency and must not 'tip off' the client (which would itself be a criminal offence under POCA 2002).

Question 62: How does a half-secret trust differ from a fully secret trust?

In a half-secret trust, the will discloses the existence of the trust but not its terms; in a fully secret trust, the will appears to make an outright gift with no mention of a trust (Correct answer)
In a half-secret trust, the trust terms are disclosed to the court but not the public
In a fully secret trust, the trustee is unaware of their role until after probate
In a half-secret trust, only half the property passes under the trust terms

Correct answer: In a half-secret trust, the will discloses the existence of the trust but not its terms; in a fully secret trust, the will appears to make an outright gift with no mention of a trust

A half-secret trust is one where the will reveals that the legatee takes as trustee but does not reveal the terms, whereas a fully secret trust appears on the face of the will as an absolute gift with the trust obligation communicated only outside the will.

Question 63: What is the purpose of a 'completion statement' in a conveyancing transaction?

A statutory declaration by the seller confirming vacant possession
A statement by the court confirming the sale is complete
A statement confirming planning permission has been obtained
A financial statement prepared by the solicitors showing the balance of funds to be paid by the buyer on completion, taking into account all adjustments (Correct answer)

Correct answer: A financial statement prepared by the solicitors showing the balance of funds to be paid by the buyer on completion, taking into account all adjustments

A completion statement sets out all the financial adjustments required on completion (purchase price, deposit paid, apportionments of outgoings, SDLT, Land Registry fees) and shows the net amount the buyer's solicitor must transfer to the seller's solicitor on completion day.

Question 64: In a claim for occupiers' liability, what duty is owed to a trespasser under the Occupiers' Liability Act 1984?

The same duty as owed to lawful visitors
A duty to take reasonable care if the occupier knows or has reasonable grounds to believe the trespasser is near the danger (Correct answer)
No duty at all
An absolute duty to ensure safety

Correct answer: A duty to take reasonable care if the occupier knows or has reasonable grounds to believe the trespasser is near the danger

Under the Occupiers' Liability Act 1984, a duty is owed to trespassers if the occupier is aware of the danger (or has reasonable grounds to believe it exists), knows or has reasonable grounds to believe the trespasser is in the vicinity, and the risk is one against which the occupier may reasonably be expected to offer protection.

Question 65: A restaurant diner posts a negative online review stating, 'In my opinion, the chef at this restaurant has no talent. The steak I ate last night was tough and flavourless, which an honest person would say is evidence of this.' The restaurant owner sues the diner for defamation. Which defence under the Defamation Act 2013 is the diner most likely to rely on?

Honest Opinion (Correct answer)
Public Interest
Absolute Privilege
Truth

Correct answer: Honest Opinion

The defence of Honest Opinion, under section 3 of the Defamation Act 2013, is the most appropriate defence. [14, 23] This defence requires three conditions to be met: (1) the statement must be one of opinion, not fact; (2) the statement must indicate the basis of the opinion; and (3) an honest person could have held that opinion based on a fact that existed at the time. [5, 18] The diner's statement is framed as an opinion ('In my opinion...') and provides the basis for it (the tough steak). The 'Truth' defence would be difficult as 'no talent' is a subjective judgment, not a provable fact. 'Public Interest' is unlikely to apply to a simple restaurant review, and 'Absolute Privilege' applies to specific situations like parliamentary or court proceedings.

Question 66: Under the Land Registration Act 2002, what is the effect of first registration of a freehold title at HM Land Registry?

The property is immediately transferred to the Crown if unregistered interests exist
The title is registered and the proprietor's rights are protected; however, overriding interests still bind without being entered on the register (Correct answer)
The registered proprietor gains an unimpeachable title that cannot be affected by prior interests
All prior equitable interests are automatically extinguished on registration

Correct answer: The title is registered and the proprietor's rights are protected; however, overriding interests still bind without being entered on the register

First registration gives the proprietor a registered title, but overriding interests (such as legal easements, short leases, and rights of persons in actual occupation under Sch.3, LRA 2002) bind the registered proprietor even without being noted on the register.

Question 67: To secure a conviction for gross negligence manslaughter, the prosecution must prove several elements derived from the case of R v Adomako. Which of the following is NOT an essential element of this offence?

The breach of the duty of care was so gross as to be considered criminal.
The defendant's breach of duty caused the victim's death.
The defendant was reckless as to whether death or serious injury would occur. (Correct answer)
The defendant owed the victim a duty of care.

Correct answer: The defendant was reckless as to whether death or serious injury would occur.

The four essential elements of gross negligence manslaughter established in *R v Adomako* are: (1) The existence of a duty of care; (2) A breach of that duty which (3) causes death; and (4) The breach must be so 'gross' in the jury's opinion as to justify a criminal conviction. The test is objective. It does not require the prosecution to prove a specific state of mind in the defendant, such as recklessness or foresight of risk. Recklessness (subjectively foreseeing a risk and taking it unjustifiably) is the *mens rea* for a different type of involuntary manslaughter (unlawful act manslaughter can also be committed with this mens rea), not gross negligence manslaughter.

Question 68: A trustee, in breach of trust, makes an unauthorised and speculative investment of £50,000 from the trust fund. The investment subsequently fails, and the entire £50,000 is lost. The beneficiaries discover the breach. Which remedy are the beneficiaries most likely to seek against the trustee personally?

A tracing order to follow the money into the failed investment.
Equitable compensation to restore the trust fund to the position it would have been in but-for the breach. (Correct answer)
An account of profits, to claim any gains the trustee made.
Rescission of the investment contract to recover the money from the investment company.

Correct answer: Equitable compensation to restore the trust fund to the position it would have been in but-for the breach.

The primary personal remedy against a trustee for a breach of trust that causes a loss is equitable compensation. The aim is to restore the trust fund to the position it would have been in had the breach not occurred. In this case, the trustee must personally pay £50,000 back into the trust fund to make good the loss. An account of profits is used when the trustee makes an unauthorised gain. Tracing is a process to identify assets, not a remedy against the trustee personally. Rescission would be a remedy against the third-party investment company, not the trustee.

Question 69: Which partial defence to murder, if successful, reduces the conviction to voluntary manslaughter?

Loss of control under the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 (Correct answer)
Self-defence
Automatism
Duress

Correct answer: Loss of control under the Coroners and Justice Act 2009

Loss of control (replacing the old provocation defence) is a partial defence to murder under sections 54-56 of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009. If successful, it reduces the conviction from murder to voluntary manslaughter.

Question 70: The Scottish Parliament passes an Act that seeks to regulate the UK's armed forces stationed in Scotland. The regulation of national defence is listed as a reserved matter in the Scotland Act 1998. What is the legal status of the Act of the Scottish Parliament?

It is valid law within Scotland but is subordinate to any conflicting UK legislation.
It is temporarily valid until challenged and struck down by the UK Supreme Court.
It is not law because it relates to a reserved matter and is therefore outside the legislative competence of the Scottish Parliament. (Correct answer)
It becomes law only if it is subsequently approved by a resolution of the UK Parliament.

Correct answer: It is not law because it relates to a reserved matter and is therefore outside the legislative competence of the Scottish Parliament.

The Scotland Act 1998 grants the Scottish Parliament legislative competence over devolved matters but explicitly lists reserved matters that remain with the UK Parliament. [13, 25, 28] Defence and national security are reserved matters. [13] Any provision of an Act of the Scottish Parliament that is outside its legislative competence, such as legislating on a reserved matter, is 'not law' from the outset (ab initio) under section 29(1) of the Scotland Act 1998. [16]

Question 71: Judicial review in English administrative law allows the courts to review government decisions on which of the following grounds?

Whether the decision achieved the best economic outcome
Merits, policy, and proportionality only
Whether the decision was popular with the public
Illegality, irrationality, and procedural impropriety (Correct answer)

Correct answer: Illegality, irrationality, and procedural impropriety

Lord Diplock in Council of Civil Service Unions v Minister for the Civil Service [1985] (the GCHQ case) identified three grounds of judicial review: illegality, irrationality (Wednesbury unreasonableness), and procedural impropriety. Proportionality may also apply in human rights cases.

Question 72: Which case established the modern test for duty of care in negligence using the 'neighbour principle'?

Caparo Industries plc v Dickman [1990]
Hedley Byrne & Co v Heller [1964]
Donoghue v Stevenson [1932] (Correct answer)
Alcock v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire [1992]

Correct answer: Donoghue v Stevenson [1932]

Donoghue v Stevenson [1932] established the 'neighbour principle' — you must take reasonable care to avoid acts or omissions that you can reasonably foresee would be likely to injure your neighbour (those closely and directly affected by your act).

Question 73: What stamp duty land tax (SDLT) rate applies to the portion of a residential property purchase price between £250,001 and £925,000 for a standard first-time buyer who is not replacing a main residence?

10%
5% (Correct answer)
0%
2%

Correct answer: 5%

Under current SDLT rates in England, for standard residential purchases, the 5% SDLT rate applies to the portion of the purchase price between £250,001 and £925,000. First-time buyers receive relief on the first £425,000 (0% threshold) but the 5% rate then applies from £425,001 to £625,000 before standard rates apply above.

Question 74: A claimant's solicitor is preparing to apply for summary judgment under CPR Part 24 against a defendant who has filed a weak defence. What are the two grounds the court must be satisfied of to grant summary judgment?

The defendant has no real prospect of successfully defending the claim, and the application is made in good faith.
The defence is an abuse of the court's process, and the claimant has provided sufficient evidence to prove the claim on the balance of probabilities.
The defendant has no real prospect of successfully defending the claim, and there is no other compelling reason why the case should be disposed of at a trial. (Correct answer)
The claim has a high probability of success at trial, and there is no other compelling reason for the case to proceed to trial.

Correct answer: The defendant has no real prospect of successfully defending the claim, and there is no other compelling reason why the case should be disposed of at a trial.

Under CPR 24.3, the court may grant summary judgment if it considers that the respondent (in this case, the defendant) has no real prospect of succeeding on the claim or defence, and there is no other compelling reason why the case or issue should be disposed of at a trial. Both of these limbs of the test must be satisfied for the application to be successful.

Question 75: A senior court issues a declaration of incompatibility under section 4 of the Human Rights Act 1998 regarding a provision in an Act of Parliament. What is the immediate legal effect of this declaration on the statutory provision?

The provision is automatically nullified and ceases to have legal effect.
The provision is disapplied in the specific case but remains valid for all future cases.
The provision is suspended for a fixed period to allow Parliament to enact remedial legislation.
The provision remains legally valid and in force unless and until Parliament decides to amend or repeal it. (Correct answer)

Correct answer: The provision remains legally valid and in force unless and until Parliament decides to amend or repeal it.

A declaration of incompatibility under section 4 of the Human Rights Act 1998 has no immediate legal effect on the validity of the legislation in question. [4, 14, 29] This mechanism respects the doctrine of Parliamentary Sovereignty. [14, 31] The Act remains law and is enforceable. The declaration serves as a formal notification to Parliament that the provision is incompatible with Convention rights, creating political pressure for amendment, which can be done via a fast-track remedial order under section 10, but Parliament is not legally compelled to act. [4]

Question 76: What does 'adverse possession' allow under English land law?

A mortgagee to take possession on default
The Land Registry to remove a proprietor's title for non-payment of fees
A squatter to acquire title to land after being in factual possession for the requisite period without the owner's consent (Correct answer)
A landlord to take back possession from a tenant in breach

Correct answer: A squatter to acquire title to land after being in factual possession for the requisite period without the owner's consent

Adverse possession allows a person in factual possession of land (without the owner's permission) to acquire title after a qualifying period. Under the Land Registration Act 2002, the squatter must apply after 10 years' adverse possession; the registered proprietor has an opportunity to object.

Question 77: Which of the following statements accurately describes the procedure for passing a written resolution in a private limited company in the UK?

A written resolution can be used to remove a director before the expiration of their term of office.
A written resolution requires the same percentage of votes to pass as a resolution at a general meeting (simple majority for ordinary, 75% for special). (Correct answer)
Public limited companies can use the written resolution procedure for routine decisions.
A written resolution is passed when a simple majority of members who have received it signify their agreement.

Correct answer: A written resolution requires the same percentage of votes to pass as a resolution at a general meeting (simple majority for ordinary, 75% for special).

Under the Companies Act 2006, a written resolution of a private company is passed if the required majority of eligible members signify their agreement. For an ordinary resolution, this is a simple majority (over 50%) of the total voting rights, and for a special resolution, it is a majority of not less than 75% of the total voting rights. The Companies Act 2006 specifically prohibits the use of a written resolution to remove a director or an auditor before their term has expired (s288(2)). This procedure is only available to private companies, not public ones.

Question 78: An unmarried couple purchase a house together as beneficial tenants in common to be their family home. They have a young child who lives with them. Following the breakdown of their relationship, one partner moves out and applies to the court for an order for sale under the Trusts of Land and Appointment of Trustees Act 1996 (TOLATA). The other partner, who still lives in the property with the child, wishes to postpone the sale. Which of the following factors is the court required to have regard to under section 15 of TOLATA?

The welfare of any minor who occupies the land as their home. (Correct answer)
Whether the resident partner can afford to buy out the other's share within 90 days.
The financial conduct of the parties during their relationship.
The wishes of the majority of the beneficiaries, which will be the decisive factor.

Correct answer: The welfare of any minor who occupies the land as their home.

Section 15 of the Trusts of Land and Appointment of Trustees Act 1996 sets out a non-exhaustive list of factors the court must consider when hearing an application for an order for sale. Section 15(1)(c) specifically includes 'the welfare of any minor who occupies or might reasonably be expected to occupy any land subject to the trust as his home'. While other factors like the purpose of the trust and the intentions of the parties are relevant, the welfare of a resident minor is a mandatory consideration and often a very significant one.

Question 79: Under the SRA Transparency Rules, what information must solicitors publish on their website?

Copies of all client care letters sent in the previous year
The names and salaries of all fee earners
Pricing information for specified services (e.g., residential conveyancing, probate, employment tribunal claims) and certain other prescribed information (Correct answer)
Full details of every case they have handled in the previous year

Correct answer: Pricing information for specified services (e.g., residential conveyancing, probate, employment tribunal claims) and certain other prescribed information

The SRA Transparency Rules (in force from December 2018) require firms that offer certain specified legal services to publish pricing information and other prescribed information (e.g., complaints procedures, regulatory status, key staff details) on their website to help consumers make informed choices.

Question 80: A construction company contracts with a supplier for the delivery of 10 tonnes of steel on a specific date. The contract includes a clause stating that for every day the delivery is late, the supplier must pay the construction company £1,000. The steel is delivered five days late. This clause is most likely to be interpreted by a court as:

A condition of the contract, allowing for termination.
A penalty clause, and therefore unenforceable.
A liquidated damages clause, and therefore enforceable if it is a genuine pre-estimate of loss. (Correct answer)
A warranty, allowing for damages only.

Correct answer: A liquidated damages clause, and therefore enforceable if it is a genuine pre-estimate of loss.

This clause specifies a sum payable upon a breach of contract. The key legal question is whether it is a valid liquidated damages clause or an unenforceable penalty clause. A liquidated damages clause is an agreement where the parties have made a genuine pre-estimate of the likely loss that would be caused by the breach. A penalty clause, by contrast, is designed to deter a breach by imposing a liability that is extravagant and unconscionable in comparison with the greatest loss that could conceivably be proved to have followed from the breach. If the £1,000 per day is a genuine pre-estimate of the construction company's losses (e.g., costs of project delay), it will be upheld.

Question 81: For discretionary trusts, which test for certainty of objects was adopted by the House of Lords in McPhail v Doulton [1971]?

The complete list test
The majority test
The is or is not test (Correct answer)
The substantial number test

Correct answer: The is or is not test

In McPhail v Doulton the House of Lords applied the 'is or is not' test: a discretionary trust is valid if it can be said with certainty of any given person whether they are or are not within the class.

Question 82: Under the Scotland Act 1998, the Scottish Parliament has the power to legislate on:

All matters except those reserved to Westminster, as listed in Schedule 5 (Correct answer)
Only matters approved by the UK Parliament on a case-by-case basis
Only matters specifically listed in Schedule 5 as reserved
All matters including defence and foreign affairs

Correct answer: All matters except those reserved to Westminster, as listed in Schedule 5

The Scotland Act 1998 uses a reserved powers model: the Scottish Parliament can legislate on any matter that is not specifically reserved to Westminster in Schedule 5. Reserved matters include defence, foreign affairs, and immigration.

Question 83: Which type of resulting trust arises where a person contributes to the purchase price of property but legal title is conveyed into another's name?

Constructive resulting trust
Presumed resulting trust (Correct answer)
Institutional resulting trust
Automatic resulting trust

Correct answer: Presumed resulting trust

A presumed resulting trust arises from circumstances giving rise to a presumption — such as a purchase price contribution — that the legal owner holds on trust for the contributor.

Question 84: What is the constitutional role of the royal prerogative?

Powers granted to the monarch by Act of Parliament
A set of powers exercised by the monarch personally without ministerial advice
Residual powers of the Crown exercised by ministers, including treaty-making and deployment of armed forces (Correct answer)
Advisory powers held by the Privy Council

Correct answer: Residual powers of the Crown exercised by ministers, including treaty-making and deployment of armed forces

The royal prerogative consists of residual common law powers of the Crown, now exercised by government ministers. These include foreign affairs, treaty-making, deployment of armed forces, and the prerogative of mercy. They are not derived from statute.

Question 85: In registered land, which interests automatically override a registered disposition without appearing on the register (under Schedule 3, LRA 2002)?

Legal leases not exceeding 7 years, legal easements qualifying under s.29(2)(a)(ii), and rights of persons in actual occupation (Correct answer)
All mortgages and charges registered at Companies House
Interests of registered proprietors only
All equitable interests including beneficial interests under a trust

Correct answer: Legal leases not exceeding 7 years, legal easements qualifying under s.29(2)(a)(ii), and rights of persons in actual occupation

Schedule 3 of the LRA 2002 lists overriding interests that bind registered proprietors without registration, including: legal leases not exceeding 7 years, qualifying legal easements, and interests of persons in actual occupation (if discoverable on reasonable inspection or known to the disponee).

Question 86: What is the SRA's approach to 'outcomes-focused regulation'?

Requiring solicitors to document every decision they make
Setting high-level principles and outcomes that solicitors must achieve, leaving flexibility in how they are met, with solicitors exercising professional judgment (Correct answer)
Focusing only on the financial outcomes of legal matters
Prescribing exact procedures for every situation solicitors may face

Correct answer: Setting high-level principles and outcomes that solicitors must achieve, leaving flexibility in how they are met, with solicitors exercising professional judgment

The SRA's approach is outcomes-focused: rather than prescribing detailed rules for every situation, the Standards and Regulations set high-level principles and expected outcomes. Solicitors must use professional judgment to determine how to achieve these in their specific context.

Question 87: Which doctrine allows a court to imply a term into a contract on the basis that it is so obvious it goes without saying?

Both the officious bystander and business efficacy tests
The officious bystander test (Correct answer)
The contra proferentem rule
The business efficacy test

Correct answer: The officious bystander test

The 'officious bystander' test (from Shirlaw v Southern Foundries [1939]) implies terms that are so obvious that a bystander suggesting them would be told 'of course'. The business efficacy test is the other main implied term test. Both tests must be satisfied to imply a term in fact.

Question 88: A local authority, acting under a statutory power to 'regulate and manage public parks', introduces a new byelaw prohibiting any political speeches within all parks in its jurisdiction. A pressure group that regularly holds peaceful rallies in one of the parks wishes to challenge the legality of this byelaw via judicial review. On which of the following grounds is their challenge most likely to succeed?

Illegality, because the byelaw is an unreasonable fetter on the authority's discretion and was made for an improper purpose.
Illegality, because the total ban goes beyond the power to 'regulate and manage' and is disproportionate, thus being an unlawful exercise of the statutory power. (Correct answer)
Procedural impropriety, because the authority failed to consult the pressure group before enacting the byelaw.
Irrationality, because no reasonable authority would ever impose a complete ban on political speech.

Correct answer: Illegality, because the total ban goes beyond the power to 'regulate and manage' and is disproportionate, thus being an unlawful exercise of the statutory power.

The correct ground is illegality. The statutory power is to 'regulate and manage', which implies a degree of control and organisation, but a blanket ban on all political speeches could be argued to be *ultra vires* (beyond the powers granted). [10] It is not regulating the activity but prohibiting it entirely. This can be framed as an error of law where the authority has misunderstood the scope of its power. The concept of proportionality, particularly relevant in cases involving human rights (such as freedom of expression), would be used to argue that a complete ban is a disproportionate interference and therefore not a lawful exercise of the power to 'regulate'.

Question 89: A developer purchased a plot of registered freehold land in 2020. The transfer from the seller contained a covenant requiring the developer and its successors in title 'to construct and forever maintain at its own expense a substantial boundary fence' along the border with the seller's retained land. The developer built the fence but sold the plot in 2023 to a new owner. The fence has now fallen into disrepair. The original seller wishes to enforce the covenant against the new owner. What is the correct legal position?

The covenant is enforceable under the principle of mutual benefit and burden.
The covenant is enforceable because the benefit runs with the retained land.
The covenant is likely to be unenforceable as the burden of a positive covenant does not run with freehold land. (Correct answer)
The covenant is enforceable as it was correctly protected by a notice on the register.

Correct answer: The covenant is likely to be unenforceable as the burden of a positive covenant does not run with freehold land.

The covenant to 'construct and forever maintain' a fence requires the expenditure of money and is therefore a positive covenant. The long-established rule, confirmed by the House of Lords in *Rhone v Stephens*, is that the burden of a positive covenant does not run with the freehold land either at common law or in equity. Therefore, the original seller cannot directly enforce the covenant against the new owner, who was not a party to the original deed. The other options are incorrect as they do not overcome this fundamental rule.

Question 90: A legal theorist argues that the 'Rule of Law' requires only that laws are clear, publicised in advance, stable, and applied prospectively, without regard to whether the content of those laws is morally just or fair. Which conception of the Rule of Law is being described?

Formal (Correct answer)
Procedural
Substantive
Political

Correct answer: Formal

This describes the 'formal' conception of the Rule of Law. Formalist theories focus on the form and procedure of law-making and application—such as clarity, publicity, and prospectivity—rather than the substantive content or moral quality of the laws. [23, 24, 30] A substantive conception, by contrast, would incorporate elements of justice and the protection of fundamental rights within the definition of the Rule of Law. [15, 24]

Question 91: What principle was established in Hadley v Baxendale (1854) regarding damages for breach of contract?

Damages are limited to losses that were reasonably foreseeable at the time of contract formation (Correct answer)
Consequential losses can never be recovered
The innocent party can always recover all losses caused by the breach
Only the value of the contract price can be recovered

Correct answer: Damages are limited to losses that were reasonably foreseeable at the time of contract formation

Hadley v Baxendale established the remoteness principle: damages for breach of contract are recoverable only if they arise naturally from the breach (limb 1) or were within the reasonable contemplation of both parties at contract formation (limb 2).

Question 92: Which three certainties must be satisfied to create a valid express trust, as established in Knight v Knight (1840)?

Certainty of intention, subject matter, and objects (Correct answer)
Certainty of parties, subject matter, and duration
Certainty of objects, consideration, and writing
Certainty of intention, consideration, and capacity

Correct answer: Certainty of intention, subject matter, and objects

Lord Langdale in Knight v Knight established that a valid express trust requires certainty of intention (to create a trust), certainty of subject matter (the trust property), and certainty of objects (the beneficiaries).

Question 93: A homeowner wants to build a single-storey rear extension on their property. They believe they may not need to submit a full planning application. Which of the following pieces of legislation is most likely to grant 'deemed' planning permission for such a project, provided certain conditions and limitations are met?

The Building Act 1984.
The Housing and Planning Act 2016.
The Localism Act 2011.
The Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) (England) Order 2015. (Correct answer)

Correct answer: The Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) (England) Order 2015.

The Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) (England) Order 2015 sets out classes of development that are granted planning permission without the need for a formal application, known as 'permitted development rights'. Class A of Part 1 of Schedule 2 to the Order specifically deals with the enlargement, improvement, or other alteration of a dwellinghouse, including single-storey rear extensions, subject to various size limitations and conditions.

Question 94: In Re Golay's Will Trusts, why was a direction to pay a beneficiary 'a reasonable income' held to satisfy certainty of subject matter?

The testator had provided a definition of 'reasonable' in the will
The beneficiary had agreed to the amount in advance
A court could objectively assess what constituted a reasonable income (Correct answer)
The Trustee Act 2000 provides a default definition of reasonable income

Correct answer: A court could objectively assess what constituted a reasonable income

In Re Golay, the court held that 'reasonable income' was sufficiently certain because it provided an objective yardstick by which the court could determine the appropriate amount.

Question 95: What is a conditional fee agreement (CFA) commonly known as, and how does it work?

A 'no win, no fee' arrangement where the solicitor charges a success fee if the case is won (Correct answer)
A legal aid arrangement funded by the government
An hourly rate arrangement with a cap on total fees
A fixed fee arrangement where the solicitor charges a set amount regardless of outcome

Correct answer: A 'no win, no fee' arrangement where the solicitor charges a success fee if the case is won

A conditional fee agreement (CFA) is commonly known as a 'no win, no fee' agreement. Under a CFA, the solicitor agrees not to charge fees if the case is lost, but may charge a success fee (capped at 100% of the base costs) if the case is won.

Question 96: Which of the following statements concerning the legal principle of consideration in English contract law is correct?

Consideration must move from the promisee. (Correct answer)
Consideration must be adequate but need not be sufficient.
Performing an existing public duty is always good consideration.
Past consideration is always valid consideration.

Correct answer: Consideration must move from the promisee.

A fundamental rule of consideration is that it must move from the promisee. This means that the person who is receiving the promise must be the one who provides the consideration. The other options are incorrect: consideration must be sufficient (have some value in the eyes of the law) but need not be adequate (a fair price); past consideration is generally not good consideration; and performing an existing public duty is not good consideration, as established in Collins v Godefroy.

Question 97: A claimant issues a claim form for a simple breach of contract valued at £18,000 against a defendant based in England. After the defendant files a defence, the court provisionally decides on the appropriate track. Which track is the court most likely to allocate this claim to, and what is the primary factor influencing this decision?

The Fast Track, primarily due to the financial value of the claim. (Correct answer)
The Intermediate Track, as the value exceeds the Small Claims limit but does not warrant the complexity of the Multi-Track.
The Small Claims Track, because the legal issues are straightforward.
The Multi-Track, because breach of contract claims are inherently complex.

Correct answer: The Fast Track, primarily due to the financial value of the claim.

According to the Civil Procedure Rules (CPR) Part 26, the Fast Track is the normal track for claims with a financial value between £10,000 and £25,000, provided the trial is unlikely to last for more than one day and oral expert evidence is limited. The primary factor for allocation is the financial value of the claim. Since the claim is valued at £18,000 and is described as simple, it falls squarely within the Fast Track criteria. The Small Claims Track is for claims up to £10,000, and the Multi-Track is for claims over £25,000 or those which are particularly complex. The Intermediate Track is a newer track for certain claims valued between £25,000 and £100,000.

Question 98: Which of the following constitutes a breach of the self-dealing rule applicable to trustees?

A trustee investing in government gilts without prior court approval
A trustee distributing income to life tenants before capital to remaindermen
A trustee delegating investment management to a professional fund manager
A trustee purchasing trust property from the trust estate for their own benefit (Correct answer)

Correct answer: A trustee purchasing trust property from the trust estate for their own benefit

The self-dealing rule prohibits a trustee from purchasing trust property because they simultaneously owe a duty as seller (to maximise price) and act as buyer (with an interest in minimising price), creating an irreconcilable conflict of interest.

Question 99: In English law, the defence of self-defence requires that the force used was:

The minimum force possible
Only available if the defendant retreated first
Authorised by a court order
Proportionate to the threat, even if the defendant's perception of the threat was mistaken (Correct answer)

Correct answer: Proportionate to the threat, even if the defendant's perception of the threat was mistaken

Self-defence under section 76 of the Criminal Justice and Immigration Act 2008 requires that the defendant genuinely believed force was necessary and that the force used was reasonable in the circumstances as the defendant believed them to be, even if that belief was mistaken.

Question 100: Which three elements must be established to found a claim in proprietary estoppel, as confirmed in Thorner v Major [2009]?

Writing, reliance, and registration
Assurance, reliance, and detriment (Correct answer)
Offer, acceptance, and consideration
Intention, certainty, and capacity

Correct answer: Assurance, reliance, and detriment

Proprietary estoppel requires an assurance (representation about property rights), reliance on that assurance by the claimant, and detriment suffered by the claimant as a result of that reliance.

Question 101: A settlor wishes to create a trust over 500 shares in a private company for her nephew. She completes and signs a share transfer form and gives it to her solicitor, telling the solicitor to 'deal with the transfer'. The solicitor places the form in a file but takes no further action. The settlor dies a month later. What is the most likely legal status of the shares?

The trust is completely constituted because handing the form to a solicitor is equivalent to delivery to the company.
The trust is completely constituted under the rule in *Re Rose* because the settlor has done everything necessary for her to do.
The trust is incompletely constituted because the settlor has not done everything in her power to transfer the shares.
An effective trust has been created under the rule in *Pennington v Waine* because it would be unconscionable for the gift to fail. (Correct answer)

Correct answer: An effective trust has been created under the rule in *Pennington v Waine* because it would be unconscionable for the gift to fail.

While the strict rule in *Milroy v Lord* holds that equity will not perfect an imperfect gift, exceptions have developed. The rule in *Re Rose* requires the transferor to have done everything in their power, which is not met here as the form was not delivered to the company. However, the principle from *Pennington v Waine* allows a court to find a trust is constituted where it would be unconscionable for the donor to resile from the gift. Here, the settlor's clear intention, instructing her agent (the solicitor), and the fact she did nothing to retract the gift before her death makes it arguably unconscionable for her personal representatives to deny the trust. Therefore, a constructive trust is likely to arise.

Question 102: What is the legal term for the right of a landlord to forfeit a lease for breach of a covenant by the tenant?

The right to quiet enjoyment
The right of re-entry (forfeiture) (Correct answer)
The right of derogation from grant
The right of distress

Correct answer: The right of re-entry (forfeiture)

The right of re-entry (forfeiture) allows a landlord to bring the lease to an end when the tenant breaches a lease covenant, provided the right is expressly reserved in the lease. The tenant may apply to the court for relief from forfeiture.

Question 103: Under English law, what is the key distinction between a Limited Liability Partnership (LLP) and a traditional partnership?

An LLP is a separate legal entity with limited liability for members; a traditional partnership is not a separate legal entity and partners have unlimited personal liability (Correct answer)
Traditional partnerships must have more than 20 partners
An LLP has no partners — only members
An LLP cannot enter contracts in its own name

Correct answer: An LLP is a separate legal entity with limited liability for members; a traditional partnership is not a separate legal entity and partners have unlimited personal liability

An LLP (under the Limited Liability Partnerships Act 2000) is a separate legal entity from its members, who benefit from limited liability. A traditional partnership under the Partnership Act 1890 is not a separate legal entity, and partners have unlimited joint and several liability for the firm's debts.

Question 104: Two sisters own a house as beneficial joint tenants. One sister decides she wants to sever the joint tenancy. She posts a written notice of severance by first-class post to the house, where they both live. The letter is delivered through the letterbox. However, before the other sister reads it, the sender has a change of heart, retrieves the letter from the doormat and destroys it. What is the legal status of the co-ownership?

The severance is only effective if the sender registers the notice with the Land Registry.
The severance was ineffective because the sender revoked her intention by destroying the letter.
The joint tenancy was severed in equity when the letter was delivered. (Correct answer)
The joint tenancy remains unsevered as the notice was not read by the other joint tenant.

Correct answer: The joint tenancy was severed in equity when the letter was delivered.

Under section 36(2) of the Law of Property Act 1925, a joint tenancy can be severed by written notice. Service of the notice is governed by section 196 of the same Act, which deems notice to be served when it is left at the last known place of abode. The case of Kinch v Bullard [1998] established that severance is effective upon delivery of the notice, not when it is read. The sender's subsequent change of mind and destruction of the letter is irrelevant once service has been effected.

Question 105: What does the equitable doctrine of promissory estoppel prevent?

An agent from exceeding their actual authority
A party from going back on a clear promise not to enforce their strict legal rights, where the other party relied on that promise to their detriment (Correct answer)
A party from making any new promises after contract formation
A court from enforcing a penalty clause

Correct answer: A party from going back on a clear promise not to enforce their strict legal rights, where the other party relied on that promise to their detriment

Promissory estoppel (Central London Property Trust Ltd v High Trees House Ltd [1947]) prevents a party from going back on a clear, unequivocal promise not to enforce their strict contractual rights, where the other party has relied on that promise to their detriment.

Question 106: What is the primary duty of a company director under s.172 of the Companies Act 2006?

To maximise short-term profits for shareholders
To comply with all regulations regardless of commercial impact
To act in the best interests of the company's employees
To act in the way they consider, in good faith, would be most likely to promote the success of the company for the benefit of its members as a whole (Correct answer)

Correct answer: To act in the way they consider, in good faith, would be most likely to promote the success of the company for the benefit of its members as a whole

Section 172 of the Companies Act 2006 requires directors to act in the way they consider, in good faith, most likely to promote the success of the company for the benefit of its members as a whole, having regard to specified factors including long-term consequences and stakeholders.

Question 107: What is 'informed consent' in the context of a solicitor-client conflict of interest?

Consent given by a third party on the client's behalf
Agreement recorded in the initial client care letter regardless of discussion
Consent given freely by a client after they have been fully and clearly informed of the nature and implications of the conflict of interest and what it means for their matter (Correct answer)
Agreement by a client after any explanation by the solicitor

Correct answer: Consent given freely by a client after they have been fully and clearly informed of the nature and implications of the conflict of interest and what it means for their matter

Informed consent to a conflict of interest requires the solicitor to give the client full, clear, and honest information about the conflict, its potential implications for their matter, and alternatives available, so the client can make a genuinely free and informed decision.

Question 108: Under which of the following circumstances is a withdrawal from a firm's client account permitted according to the SRA Accounts Rules?

To purchase office stationery as the business account is overdrawn.
To provide a short-term loan to another client who has a temporary funding shortfall.
To pay an expert's fee on behalf of a client, for which the money is specifically being held. (Correct answer)
To pay the firm's quarterly VAT bill.

Correct answer: To pay an expert's fee on behalf of a client, for which the money is specifically being held.

SRA Accounts Rule 5.1 states that money can only be withdrawn from a client account 'for the purpose for which it is being held'. Paying an expert's fee is a proper disbursement related to the client's matter. The other options represent improper use of a client account, such as using one client's money for another's benefit or for the firm's own expenses, which is a serious breach of the rules.

Question 109: In Milroy v Lord (1862), Turner LJ established a foundational principle of equity. Which statement correctly summarises it?

Equity will not perfect an imperfect gift; to be complete a donor must do everything necessary to effect the transfer (Correct answer)
An imperfect gift becomes valid once the donee acts in reliance on the promise
Courts will enforce gratuitous promises where they are supported by consideration
A trust can be created without any formality provided the intention is clear

Correct answer: Equity will not perfect an imperfect gift; to be complete a donor must do everything necessary to effect the transfer

Turner LJ in Milroy v Lord held that equity will not perfect an imperfect gift; for a gift or trust to be effective, the donor must have done everything that, according to the nature of the property, was necessary to transfer it.

Question 110: A solicitor acts for both the buyer and seller in a property transaction. Under the SRA Code of Conduct, when is this permissible?

Whenever both clients agree, regardless of any conflict
Only where both clients give informed consent and the solicitor is satisfied there is no conflict of interest, or only a limited conflict that can be managed (Correct answer)
Never — it is always prohibited
Only in residential conveyancing where both clients are individuals

Correct answer: Only where both clients give informed consent and the solicitor is satisfied there is no conflict of interest, or only a limited conflict that can be managed

Acting for both buyer and seller is generally prohibited due to conflict of interest. However, the SRA Code permits it in limited circumstances: both clients give informed consent, the solicitor considers they can act impartially, and there is no conflict of interest or only a limited conflict that can be managed appropriately.

Question 111: What is the legal position regarding a solicitor's duty of confidentiality under the SRA Code of Conduct?

Confidentiality can be waived by a junior fee earner's decision alone
Confidentiality applies only during the retainer and ends when the client relationship ends
Confidentiality applies only to documents, not spoken communications
Solicitors must keep client information confidential unless the client consents, there is a legal duty to disclose, or the law permits or requires disclosure (Correct answer)

Correct answer: Solicitors must keep client information confidential unless the client consents, there is a legal duty to disclose, or the law permits or requires disclosure

The SRA Code of Conduct requires solicitors to maintain client confidentiality indefinitely unless the client gives informed consent, there is a legal duty to disclose (e.g., court order), or the law permits disclosure (e.g., money laundering reporting obligations).

Question 112: A solicitor acting as an advocate in court has a duty to:

Object to all prosecution evidence regardless of its validity
Not mislead the court and disclose adverse authorities of which they are aware (Correct answer)
Only present evidence favourable to their client
Win the case at all costs for their client

Correct answer: Not mislead the court and disclose adverse authorities of which they are aware

A solicitor-advocate owes a paramount duty not to mislead the court. This includes an obligation to draw the court's attention to relevant legal authorities, even if they are adverse to their client's case. The duty to the court overrides the duty to the client.

Question 113: The Supreme Court decision in R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the EU [2017] established that:

The devolved legislatures had a veto over Brexit
The government could trigger Article 50 using prerogative powers
An Act of Parliament was required to authorise the triggering of Article 50 (Correct answer)
The European Communities Act 1972 was unconstitutional

Correct answer: An Act of Parliament was required to authorise the triggering of Article 50

The Miller case established that the government could not use prerogative powers to trigger Article 50, as this would effectively change domestic law by removing rights granted by the European Communities Act 1972. An Act of Parliament was required.

Question 114: A claimant in a personal injury claim makes a valid CPR Part 36 offer to settle for £50,000. The defendant does not accept the offer. The case proceeds to trial and the judge awards the claimant £60,000 in damages. Which of the following consequences is the court most likely to order, unless it considers it unjust to do so?

The defendant pays the claimant's costs on the indemnity basis from the date of the offer, plus enhanced interest on the damages.
The defendant pays the claimant's costs on the indemnity basis for the entire duration of the proceedings.
The defendant pays the claimant's costs on the standard basis up to the expiry of the relevant period for the offer, and on the indemnity basis thereafter, plus enhanced interest on damages and an additional amount. (Correct answer)
The defendant pays the claimant's costs on the standard basis up to the date of judgment.

Correct answer: The defendant pays the claimant's costs on the standard basis up to the expiry of the relevant period for the offer, and on the indemnity basis thereafter, plus enhanced interest on damages and an additional amount.

Where a claimant obtains a judgment that is at least as advantageous as their own Part 36 offer, CPR 36.17 provides for specific costs consequences. The court will, unless it considers it unjust, order the defendant to pay: the claimant's costs on the standard basis up to the end of the 'relevant period' (usually 21 days after the offer was made); costs on the indemnity basis from that date; enhanced interest on the damages (at a rate not exceeding 10% above base rate); and an additional amount of up to £75,000.

Question 115: How does English law characterise the constructive trust, in contrast to jurisdictions such as Canada?

As a remedial trust awarded at the court's discretion to reverse unjust enrichment
As a resulting trust based on implied intention
As a statutory trust governed by the Trusts of Land and Appointment of Trustees Act 1996
As an institutional trust arising automatically by operation of law (Correct answer)

Correct answer: As an institutional trust arising automatically by operation of law

English law treats the constructive trust as institutional — it arises automatically by operation of law on the occurrence of certain events — rather than as a discretionary remedy.

Question 116: Under the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) Standards and Regulations, which of the following is a core principle that all solicitors must uphold?

Refuse to act for clients who cannot pay in advance
Act in a way that upholds the constitutional principle of the rule of law and the proper administration of justice (Correct answer)
Prioritise the interests of the firm over those of the client
Maximise the firm's profitability

Correct answer: Act in a way that upholds the constitutional principle of the rule of law and the proper administration of justice

The SRA Principles include upholding the rule of law and the proper administration of justice, acting with independence, integrity, and in the best interests of clients, while maintaining public trust in the profession.

Question 117: What is the primary distinction between a condition and a warranty in a contract?

Breach of a condition entitles the innocent party to terminate and claim damages; breach of a warranty allows only a claim for damages (Correct answer)
Conditions apply to goods; warranties apply to services
Warranties are more important than conditions
A condition is written; a warranty is oral

Correct answer: Breach of a condition entitles the innocent party to terminate and claim damages; breach of a warranty allows only a claim for damages

A condition is a fundamental term: breach entitles the innocent party to treat the contract as terminated (repudiated) and claim damages. Breach of a warranty (a less important term) allows only a damages claim — the innocent party cannot terminate.

Question 118: The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) is hearing a case brought by the SRA against a solicitor accused of professional misconduct. What is the standard of proof that the SRA must meet for the SDT to find the allegations proven?

Sufficient to satisfy a reasonably prudent solicitor.
Beyond all reasonable doubt.
Clear and convincing evidence.
On the balance of probabilities. (Correct answer)

Correct answer: On the balance of probabilities.

Following the implementation of the Solicitors (Disciplinary Proceedings) Rules 2019, the standard of proof applied in the SDT is the civil standard, which is 'on the balance of probabilities'. This means the tribunal must be satisfied that it is more likely than not that the alleged misconduct occurred. This replaced the previous criminal standard of 'beyond all reasonable doubt'.

Question 119: Under the Variation of Trusts Act 1958, on whose behalf may the court give consent to a variation of trust beneficial interests?

Minors, unborn beneficiaries, and persons lacking mental capacity (Correct answer)
The settlor, provided they are still alive and solvent
Adult beneficiaries who have full legal capacity
Any beneficiary who objects to the proposed variation

Correct answer: Minors, unborn beneficiaries, and persons lacking mental capacity

The Variation of Trusts Act 1958 empowers the court to consent on behalf of those who cannot legally consent for themselves — namely minors, the unborn, and those lacking capacity — but adult beneficiaries with capacity must personally consent.

Question 120: Under the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002, what is a 'consent SAR' and what does it allow a solicitor to do?

A SAR that must be consented to by the SRA before submission to the NCA
A SAR submitted with the client's knowledge and consent
A SAR submitted to the NCA seeking consent to proceed with a transaction that might otherwise constitute a money laundering offence, providing a defence if consent is granted or 7 working days pass without refusal (Correct answer)
A SAR that allows a solicitor to maintain the client relationship without reporting

Correct answer: A SAR submitted to the NCA seeking consent to proceed with a transaction that might otherwise constitute a money laundering offence, providing a defence if consent is granted or 7 working days pass without refusal

A 'consent SAR' (or 'authorised disclosure') is submitted to the NCA before proceeding with a suspicious transaction. If the NCA grants consent, or does not refuse within 7 working days (with a potential 31-day moratorium period following refusal), the solicitor has a defence against money laundering liability when proceeding with the transaction.

Question 121: Under the Wills Act 1837, what formalities are required for a valid will in England and Wales?

The will must be typed and signed by the testator only
The will must be in writing, signed by the testator (or by another in their presence and by their direction), with the testator's signature made or acknowledged in the presence of two witnesses present at the same time, who then sign the will (Correct answer)
A solicitor must witness every will for it to be valid
The will must be registered at the Probate Registry to be valid

Correct answer: The will must be in writing, signed by the testator (or by another in their presence and by their direction), with the testator's signature made or acknowledged in the presence of two witnesses present at the same time, who then sign the will

Under s.9 of the Wills Act 1837 (as amended), a valid will must: be in writing; be signed by the testator (or by another in their presence and by their direction); the testator's signature must be made or acknowledged in the presence of two or more witnesses present at the same time; and each witness must sign in the testator's presence.

Question 122: What is the legal effect of intoxication on mens rea for crimes of basic intent?

Intoxication automatically reduces the charge
Involuntary intoxication is never a defence
Voluntary intoxication cannot negate the mens rea for basic intent offences (Correct answer)
Voluntary intoxication is always a complete defence

Correct answer: Voluntary intoxication cannot negate the mens rea for basic intent offences

Following DPP v Majewski [1977], voluntary intoxication cannot be relied upon to negate the mens rea for basic intent offences (such as assault, battery, and s.47 ABH). It may only be relevant to specific intent offences like murder or theft.

Question 123: In 1994, a landlord granted a 20-year commercial lease to a tenant (T1). In 2010, T1 assigned the lease to an assignee (T2) with the landlord's consent. In 2012, T2 failed to pay rent. The landlord wishes to recover the unpaid rent. From whom can the landlord legally seek to recover the arrears?

Only from T2, as T1 was automatically released from liability upon assignment.
From T2, but only after successfully obtaining a court judgment against T1.
Only from T1, as the original tenant is solely liable for the duration of the term.
From either T1 or T2, due to privity of contract with T1 and privity of estate with T2. (Correct answer)

Correct answer: From either T1 or T2, due to privity of contract with T1 and privity of estate with T2.

The lease was granted in 1994, which is before the Landlord and Tenant (Covenants) Act 1995 came into force (1 January 1996). Therefore, it is an 'old lease'. For old leases, the original tenant (T1) remains liable for all covenants for the entire term of the lease due to the doctrine of privity of contract. The current tenant (T2) is also liable for covenants that 'touch and concern' the land (which includes the rent covenant) due to the doctrine of privity of estate. The landlord can therefore choose to sue either T1 or T2 for the unpaid rent.

Question 124: In tort law, what does the principle 'res ipsa loquitur' mean and when is it applied?

A rule requiring written evidence of negligence
The thing speaks for itself — it shifts the evidential burden when an accident would not normally happen without negligence (Correct answer)
Latin for 'the defendant is liable' — applied in all personal injury cases
A defence to negligence available to professionals

Correct answer: The thing speaks for itself — it shifts the evidential burden when an accident would not normally happen without negligence

'Res ipsa loquitur' (the thing speaks for itself) applies when the circumstances of an accident are such that it would not have occurred without negligence, the thing causing it was under the defendant's control, and there is no other explanation. It raises an inference of negligence.

Question 125: In leasehold law, what is the 'privity of estate' rule?

Subleases are automatically void unless registered
The obligations under a lease bind the persons who hold the respective estates (freehold and leasehold) for the time being, while that relationship exists (Correct answer)
Lease obligations bind only the original landlord and tenant
All lease covenants are personal and cannot be transferred

Correct answer: The obligations under a lease bind the persons who hold the respective estates (freehold and leasehold) for the time being, while that relationship exists

Privity of estate means that obligations in a lease (under the old law, pre-Landlord and Tenant (Covenants) Act 1995) bind those who stand in the relationship of landlord and tenant for the time being. This concept explains why assignees are bound by covenants that touch and concern the land.

Question 126: A junior solicitor in a firm becomes aware that a partner is systematically and deliberately overcharging a major client by falsifying time-recording entries. The junior solicitor is concerned about their duty to report the matter. According to the SRA Code of Conduct, to whom should the junior solicitor report the serious breach?

Only to the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) once they have gathered irrefutable evidence.
To the firm's Compliance Officer for Legal Practice (COLP). (Correct answer)
To the Law Society for guidance on how to proceed.
Directly to the client who is being overcharged.

Correct answer: To the firm's Compliance Officer for Legal Practice (COLP).

The SRA Code of Conduct for Solicitors (paragraph 7.7) requires solicitors to report promptly to the SRA or another approved regulator any facts or matters that they reasonably believe constitute a serious breach of regulatory arrangements by any person. Paragraph 7.8 clarifies that this obligation is satisfied if the report is made to the firm's COLP. The COLP then has responsibility for reporting to the SRA. Reporting directly to the client could breach other duties, the Law Society is a representative body not the regulator, and the SDT is a tribunal, not the initial reporting body.

Question 127: Which of the following statements most accurately compares the duty of care owed by an occupier under the Occupiers' Liability Act 1957 (to lawful visitors) and the Occupiers' Liability Act 1984 (to trespassers)?

The 1957 Act imposes a duty to ensure visitors are completely safe, whereas the 1984 Act imposes a duty to warn of obvious dangers.
A duty under the 1957 Act is owed automatically to all lawful visitors, whereas a duty under the 1984 Act is only owed for dangers the occupier created deliberately to harm trespassers.
The 1957 Act allows for claims for property damage, while the 1984 Act restricts claims to death and personal injury only. (Correct answer)
Both Acts impose the same 'common duty of care', but the 1984 Act allows for this duty to be more easily discharged through warnings.

Correct answer: The 1957 Act allows for claims for property damage, while the 1984 Act restricts claims to death and personal injury only.

The Occupiers' Liability Act 1957 provides that the common duty of care extends to keeping the visitor and their property reasonably safe. [6] In contrast, the Occupiers' Liability Act 1984, which governs the duty to non-visitors (trespassers), explicitly states that the duty is in respect of death or personal injury and does not extend to damage to property. [8, 12] The other options are incorrect. The 1957 Act requires reasonable safety, not complete safety. The duties under the two acts are different; the duty to a trespasser only arises if specific conditions regarding the occupier's knowledge of the danger and the trespasser's presence are met. [10, 21] The duty under the 1984 Act is not restricted to deliberately created dangers.

Question 128: Under the rule in Strong v Bird, when may an imperfect inter vivos gift be perfected on the donor's death?

Where the donee gave consideration in reliance on the promised gift
Where the donor made a written promise to give the property and that promise was witnessed
Where the gift is registered at the Land Registry before the donor's death
Where the donor had a continuing intention to make the gift and the donee is appointed executor or administrator of the donor's estate (Correct answer)

Correct answer: Where the donor had a continuing intention to make the gift and the donee is appointed executor or administrator of the donor's estate

The rule in Strong v Bird perfects an imperfect gift where the donor had a continuing intention to give and, on the donor's death, the donee is appointed as executor or administrator, thereby vesting legal title in them.

Question 129: The rule in Saunders v Vautier allows beneficiaries to collapse a trust and demand the trust property. What conditions must be met?

All beneficiaries must be adults of full capacity and together hold the entire beneficial interest (Correct answer)
The trustees must agree that termination is in the best interests of the beneficiaries
The settlor must consent to the termination
A majority of beneficiaries vote to terminate the trust

Correct answer: All beneficiaries must be adults of full capacity and together hold the entire beneficial interest

Under Saunders v Vautier, if all beneficiaries are adults with full mental capacity and between them hold the entire beneficial interest, they may collectively demand that the trustees transfer the trust property to them.

Question 130: Which of the following is a key requirement for a Deed of Variation to be effective for 'reading back' to the date of death for Inheritance Tax (IHT) and Capital Gains Tax (CGT) purposes?

It must be made in writing within two years of the date of death and contain a statement of intent for the relevant taxes. (Correct answer)
It must be approved by the High Court before being executed.
It must be made within six months of the Grant of Probate being issued.
It must be signed by all executors and every beneficiary named in the original will.

Correct answer: It must be made in writing within two years of the date of death and contain a statement of intent for the relevant taxes.

For a variation to be treated for IHT and CGT purposes as if it had been made by the deceased, several conditions must be met under s142 of the Inheritance Tax Act 1984 and s62 of the Taxation of Chargeable Gains Act 1992. The most critical requirements are that the variation must be made in writing, executed within two years of the deceased's death, and contain a clear statement that the parties intend for these sections to apply.

Question 131: What is the purpose of the 'client care letter' that solicitors must provide at the outset of a retainer?

To serve as a deed of assignment of any litigation proceeds to the firm
To limit the firm's liability to the amount of the client's first payment
To thank the client for instructing the firm and introduce the senior partner
To set out clearly the terms of the retainer including the scope of work, costs information, the name of the fee earner, complaints procedure, and key information required by the SRA Code (Correct answer)

Correct answer: To set out clearly the terms of the retainer including the scope of work, costs information, the name of the fee earner, complaints procedure, and key information required by the SRA Code

The client care letter (often combined with terms of business) must include: the scope of work; costs information and billing arrangements; the name and status of the fee earner; details of the complaints procedure; and regulatory information. It satisfies the SRA's costs and client care information obligations.

Question 132: A solicitor is advising a client who has received a 'Letter of Claim' under the Pre-Action Protocol for Debt Claims. The client is an individual who disputes the amount owed to a large retail company. According to the protocol, what is the minimum period the client must be given to respond to the Letter of Claim before the creditor can start court proceedings?

14 days
21 days
28 days
30 days (Correct answer)

Correct answer: 30 days

The Pre-Action Protocol for Debt Claims, which applies to businesses (including sole traders) claiming payment of a debt from an individual, states that the debtor must be given a minimum of 30 days to respond to the Letter of Claim. The creditor should not start court proceedings until at least 30 days from the date of the letter. This period allows the debtor to seek advice, gather information, and complete the Reply Form.

Question 133: Under Rylands v Fletcher [1868], strict liability applies when:

A person creates a public nuisance
A person brings onto their land something likely to cause mischief if it escapes, and it does escape (Correct answer)
A person carelessly causes damage to another's property
A person commits a trespass to land

Correct answer: A person brings onto their land something likely to cause mischief if it escapes, and it does escape

Rylands v Fletcher established strict liability for the non-natural use of land where a person brings onto their land something likely to cause mischief if it escapes, and that thing does escape and causes damage.

Question 134: What does the law mean by 'privity of contract'?

All terms must be expressly stated in writing
Contracts must be signed in private
Only parties to a contract can sue or be sued on it (Correct answer)
Contracts must be kept confidential between the parties

Correct answer: Only parties to a contract can sue or be sued on it

The doctrine of privity of contract (Dunlop Pneumatic Tyre Co v Selfridge [1915]) holds that only parties to a contract can acquire rights or obligations under it. Third parties cannot sue on a contract. However, the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999 provides an exception.

Question 135: The beneficiary principle requires a trust to have ascertainable human beneficiaries. Which of the following is a recognised anomalous exception to this principle?

Trusts for the maintenance of specific private graves (Correct answer)
Trusts for the general benefit of unincorporated associations
Trusts for abstract purposes such as world peace
Trusts for the promotion of political purposes

Correct answer: Trusts for the maintenance of specific private graves

Trusts for the upkeep of specific private graves are one of a small number of anomalous exceptions upheld despite having no human beneficiaries, provided they are limited in duration (e.g., Pettingall v Pettingall).

Question 136: What is the effect of 'economic duress' on a contract?

The contract is only affected if physical violence was threatened
The contract is void from the outset
Economic duress has no legal effect on commercial contracts
The contract is voidable at the option of the innocent party (Correct answer)

Correct answer: The contract is voidable at the option of the innocent party

Economic duress (illegitimate pressure such as threatening to breach a contract unless extra payment is made) renders a contract voidable at the option of the innocent party. It does not make the contract void ab initio.

Question 137: What is a 'covenant for quiet enjoyment' implied into every lease?

An obligation on the tenant to keep the property quiet at all hours
A landlord's obligation not to interfere with the tenant's lawful possession and enjoyment of the property (Correct answer)
A right for the landlord to inspect the property at any time
An obligation on the tenant to keep noise levels below a set limit

Correct answer: A landlord's obligation not to interfere with the tenant's lawful possession and enjoyment of the property

The covenant for quiet enjoyment, implied into every lease, obliges the landlord not to interfere with or disturb the tenant's lawful possession and enjoyment of the property. Breach can entitle the tenant to damages or an injunction.

Question 138: A trust is established for the 'relief of poverty amongst the employees and former employees of X Ltd'. The class of beneficiaries is limited to several hundred people connected by their employment. Under the Charities Act 2011, why is this trust likely to be considered charitable?

Because the 'personal nexus' test, which would normally prevent a trust for a limited group from being public, does not apply to trusts for the relief of poverty. (Correct answer)
Because a trust for employees is always considered to be for the public benefit.
Because any trust for the relief of poverty is automatically charitable, regardless of the beneficiaries.
Because the number of potential beneficiaries is sufficiently large to constitute a section of the public.

Correct answer: Because the 'personal nexus' test, which would normally prevent a trust for a limited group from being public, does not apply to trusts for the relief of poverty.

For a trust to be charitable, it must be for a charitable purpose and be for the public benefit. Generally, a trust for a group of people linked by a 'personal nexus' (like common employment) is not considered to be for the public benefit (*Oppenheim v Tobacco Securities Trust*). However, there is a well-established exception for trusts whose purpose is the relief of poverty. In such cases, the personal nexus rule does not apply, and a trust for 'poor relations' or poor employees can be charitable.

Question 139: An employer's vicarious liability for the torts of an employee requires that the tort was committed:

While the employee was on a personal errand
In the course of employment or in a sufficiently close connection with employment (Correct answer)
Only during contractual working hours
Only on the employer's premises

Correct answer: In the course of employment or in a sufficiently close connection with employment

Following the Supreme Court decisions in Mohamud v WM Morrison Supermarkets [2016] and Various Claimants v Barclays Bank [2020], vicarious liability arises when the tort is committed in the course of employment or has a sufficiently close connection to the employee's duties.

Question 140: What is 'overreaching' in the context of English land law?

A method by which a mortgagee enforces security
A planning authority's power to override a covenant
A mechanism by which certain equitable interests (e.g., beneficial interests under a trust) are detached from the land and attach to the purchase money when land is sold by two trustees (Correct answer)
A landlord's remedy to remove a tenant exceeding their lease rights

Correct answer: A mechanism by which certain equitable interests (e.g., beneficial interests under a trust) are detached from the land and attach to the purchase money when land is sold by two trustees

Overreaching allows a purchaser of legal title to take the land free of beneficial interests under a trust of land, provided they pay the purchase money to at least two trustees. The beneficial interests are then transferred from the land to the proceeds of sale.

Question 141: Under the SRA Code, what is a solicitor's duty when instructed by a client who does not appear to understand the advice being given due to a vulnerability?

Take additional steps to ensure the client understands the advice, consider whether capacity is an issue, adapt communication to meet their needs, and consider whether a litigation friend or deputy is needed (Correct answer)
Act on instructions from the client's family instead
Refuse to act until the client obtains a medical assessment
Proceed on the basis that the client has capacity unless a court has declared otherwise

Correct answer: Take additional steps to ensure the client understands the advice, consider whether capacity is an issue, adapt communication to meet their needs, and consider whether a litigation friend or deputy is needed

The SRA Code requires solicitors to take into account client vulnerability and adapt their service accordingly. This includes using clear communication, taking extra steps to verify understanding, considering mental capacity, and potentially raising whether a deputy or litigation friend is needed.

Question 142: A man is arrested at 10:00 on Tuesday on suspicion of robbery, an indictable offence. He is taken to a designated police station, and his detention is authorised by the custody officer. What is the latest time the police can detain him without charge before they MUST apply to a magistrates' court for a warrant of further detention?

22:00 on Tuesday
10:00 on Thursday
10:00 on Wednesday
22:00 on Wednesday (Correct answer)

Correct answer: 22:00 on Wednesday

Under the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (PACE), the initial maximum period of detention without charge is 24 hours from the 'relevant time' (the time of arrival at the first police station). This initial period would expire at 10:00 on Wednesday. However, for an indictable offence, a police officer of the rank of superintendent or above can authorise a further 12 hours of detention if certain conditions are met. This extends the maximum period of detention without a warrant to 36 hours, which would expire at 22:00 on Wednesday. Any detention beyond this point requires a warrant of further detention from a magistrates' court.

Question 143: Under section 18 of the Offences Against the Person Act 1861, what must be proved regarding the defendant's mental state?

Recklessness as to some harm
Negligence
Basic intent only
Intention to cause grievous bodily harm or to resist arrest (Correct answer)

Correct answer: Intention to cause grievous bodily harm or to resist arrest

Section 18 (wounding or causing GBH with intent) requires proof of specific intent — either intent to cause GBH or intent to resist or prevent lawful apprehension. It is a specific intent offence carrying a maximum of life imprisonment.

Question 144: A director of a UK public limited company is considering a business opportunity that came to her in her capacity as a director. The company has considered the opportunity but has decided not to pursue it. According to the Companies Act 2006, which duty would be breached if the director pursues this opportunity personally without proper authorisation?

Duty to exercise independent judgment.
Duty to promote the success of the company.
Duty to avoid conflicts of interest. (Correct answer)
Duty to exercise reasonable care, skill and diligence.

Correct answer: Duty to avoid conflicts of interest.

Section 175 of the Companies Act 2006 imposes a duty on directors to avoid a situation in which they have, or can have, a direct or indirect interest that conflicts, or possibly may conflict, with the interests of the company. This specifically applies to the exploitation of any property, information, or opportunity, regardless of whether the company could take advantage of it. Pursuing the opportunity personally, even after the company has declined it, would be a breach of this duty unless the matter has been authorised by the non-conflicted directors.

Question 145: Under English company law, what is the main consequence of the principle of 'separate legal personality' established in Salomon v Salomon & Co Ltd [1897]?

Shareholders are jointly liable for company debts
A company is a legal person distinct from its shareholders, with its own rights and liabilities (Correct answer)
Directors are personally liable for all company obligations
A company cannot own property in its own name

Correct answer: A company is a legal person distinct from its shareholders, with its own rights and liabilities

Salomon v Salomon & Co Ltd [1897] established that a registered company is a legal person entirely separate from its shareholders. The company has its own rights, can own property, enter contracts, and its shareholders are not personally liable for its debts (limited liability).

Question 146: In contract law, what does 'consideration' mean?

The parties' intention to create legal relations
Something of value given by each party in exchange for the other's promise (Correct answer)
The formal writing and signature of the contract
The time allowed for acceptance of an offer

Correct answer: Something of value given by each party in exchange for the other's promise

Consideration is something of value (money, goods, services, or a promise) provided by each contracting party in exchange for the other's promise. It must be sufficient (legally recognised) but need not be adequate (equal in value).

Question 147: A woman dies, leaving a valid will that leaves her entire estate to charity. Her partner of 15 years, with whom she lived and who was financially dependent on her, is left with nothing. What is the partner's most likely course of action?

Apply for a share of the estate under the rules of intestacy.
Make a claim for reasonable financial provision under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975. (Correct answer)
Challenge the will's validity on the grounds of undue influence by the charity.
He has no claim as he was not married to the deceased.

Correct answer: Make a claim for reasonable financial provision under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975.

The Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975 allows certain categories of people to claim against an estate if the will (or intestacy) fails to make 'reasonable financial provision' for them. A person who lived in the same household as the deceased as if they were a married couple for at least two years immediately before the death is an eligible applicant. Given the long-term cohabitation and financial dependency, the partner has a strong basis for a claim under this Act.

Question 148: What is 'passing off' as a tort in business law?

Falsely claiming a product has been inspected when it has not
Fraudulently obtaining a trademark registration
Selling counterfeit currency
Misrepresenting goods or services as those of another, causing damage to the other's goodwill (Correct answer)

Correct answer: Misrepresenting goods or services as those of another, causing damage to the other's goodwill

Passing off protects unregistered trade reputation. Its three elements (Jif Lemon case) are: goodwill (in the claimant's business), misrepresentation (causing confusion with the claimant's goods/services), and damage (or likelihood of damage) to the claimant's goodwill.

Question 149: What is the distinction between legal and equitable interests in land under English law?

Equitable interests are stronger than legal interests in all circumstances
Legal interests only exist in registered land; equitable interests only in unregistered land
Legal interests bind all the world; equitable interests bind only those with notice of them (subject to overreaching and registration rules) (Correct answer)
There is no practical distinction in modern land law

Correct answer: Legal interests bind all the world; equitable interests bind only those with notice of them (subject to overreaching and registration rules)

Legal interests in land bind the whole world (e.g., legal easements, mortgages). Equitable interests traditionally bind all except a bona fide purchaser of a legal estate for value without notice. In registered land, the Land Registration Act 2002 and system of overriding interests modify this significantly.

Question 150: A company director is negotiating the sale of her business. During negotiations, she tells the potential buyer that the company's profits for the last financial year were 'in excess of £500,000'. The buyer relies on this statement and buys the business. It later transpires the profits were only £300,000. The statement about the profits is most likely to be classified as:

A condition.
A warranty.
A representation. (Correct answer)
An innominate term.

Correct answer: A representation.

A representation is a statement of fact made by one party to another before or at the time of contracting, which induces the other party to enter into the contract but does not form part of the contract itself. If it is untrue, it can give rise to a claim for misrepresentation. A warranty is a contractual promise that a statement is true, and its breach gives rise to a claim for damages but not usually termination. A condition is a fundamental term, the breach of which allows the innocent party to terminate the contract. Given the statement was made pre-contract to induce the sale, it is most accurately classified as a representation.

Question 151: Under English law, what is a 'flying freehold'?

A freehold that includes a portion of a building that overhangs or is above land owned by someone else, creating mutual dependency issues (Correct answer)
A freehold property with an unregistered title
A freehold property with no planning restrictions
A leasehold converted to freehold through enfranchisement

Correct answer: A freehold that includes a portion of a building that overhangs or is above land owned by someone else, creating mutual dependency issues

A 'flying freehold' is where part of a freehold property is situated above or over land owned by another freehold owner. This creates legal complications because freehold land law does not have a mechanism to enforce positive obligations between freeholders, causing issues with repair of shared structures.

Question 152: Which of the following is an example of a power exercised under the Royal Prerogative by government ministers?

Creating a new public holiday by statute.
Setting the annual rate of corporation tax.
Amending the Equality Act 2010 to add a new protected characteristic.
The deployment of armed forces overseas. (Correct answer)

Correct answer: The deployment of armed forces overseas.

The deployment of armed forces is a key executive power derived from the Royal Prerogative, not statute. [2, 17] While there is a constitutional convention that Parliament should be consulted, the legal basis for the power remains the prerogative. Setting tax rates is done via the annual Finance Act (a statute). Creating public holidays and amending primary legislation like the Equality Act 2010 both require new Acts of Parliament.

Question 153: A commercial tenant has a 10-year lease of a whole building. The lease contains no express covenants regarding repair by either the landlord or the tenant. The roof begins to leak, causing damage to the tenant's stock. In this situation, who is responsible for repairing the roof?

Neither party has an obligation, but the tenant can terminate the lease due to the disrepair.
The tenant, as the lease is of the whole building.
The landlord, under section 11 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985.
The landlord, under an implied common law duty to repair the structure and exterior. (Correct answer)

Correct answer: The landlord, under an implied common law duty to repair the structure and exterior.

In the absence of express terms in a commercial lease, the courts are generally reluctant to imply repairing obligations. There is no general common law duty on a landlord to repair commercial premises. Section 11 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 implies repairing obligations on a landlord, but it applies only to dwelling-houses, not to commercial leases of this nature. Therefore, without an express covenant, neither party is obliged to carry out the repair, although it is in both their interests to resolve the issue.

Question 154: Under the principle of the rule of law, as articulated by Dicey, which of the following is a key requirement?

No person shall be punished except for a distinct breach of law established before the ordinary courts (Correct answer)
The monarch is above the law
The government may act without legal authority in emergencies
Administrative tribunals are superior to ordinary courts

Correct answer: No person shall be punished except for a distinct breach of law established before the ordinary courts

Dicey's rule of law requires that no person shall be punished or made to suffer except for a distinct breach of law established in the ordinary legal manner before the ordinary courts. This ensures legal certainty and prohibits arbitrary punishment.

Question 155: Under the Companies Act 2006, a director has a duty to avoid conflicts of interest. Which section governs this?

Section 172
Section 170
Section 177
Section 175 (Correct answer)

Correct answer: Section 175

Section 175 of the Companies Act 2006 imposes a duty on directors to avoid situations in which they have, or can have, a direct or indirect interest that conflicts, or possibly may conflict, with the interests of the company.

Question 156: Under the SRA Code of Conduct, what must a solicitor do if they identify a conflict of interest between two clients?

Refer both clients to the court for a decision
Not act for both clients unless a specific exception applies and both clients give informed consent (Correct answer)
Act for the client who is paying higher fees
Continue to act for both clients with their consent

Correct answer: Not act for both clients unless a specific exception applies and both clients give informed consent

The SRA Code of Conduct requires solicitors not to act where there is a conflict of interest between clients, unless a specific exception applies (such as the substantially common interest exception or competing for the same objective) and both clients give informed written consent.

Question 157: What is a constitutional convention in the UK?

A law passed by a special constitutional majority
A non-legal rule of constitutional practice that is politically binding but not legally enforceable (Correct answer)
A treaty between the UK and other nations
A formal written rule in the UK constitution

Correct answer: A non-legal rule of constitutional practice that is politically binding but not legally enforceable

Constitutional conventions are non-legal rules that regulate the conduct of government. They are politically binding (e.g., the Salisbury Convention, collective ministerial responsibility) but are not enforceable by the courts.

Question 158: Under the Land Registration Act 2002, certain dispositions of a registered estate must be completed by registration to operate at law. Which of the following transactions is a 'registrable disposition'?

The grant of a lease for a term of exactly five years.
The creation of an interest under a resulting trust.
The grant of a legal charge. (Correct answer)
A contract for the sale of a freehold estate.

Correct answer: The grant of a legal charge.

Section 27 of the Land Registration Act 2002 lists the dispositions that must be registered to take legal effect. Section 27(2)(f) explicitly includes 'the grant of a legal charge'. A lease is only required to be registered if its term is for more than seven years (s.27(2)(b)). An interest under a resulting trust is an equitable interest, not a registrable disposition itself, although it can be protected by other means. A contract for sale creates an equitable interest and can be protected by a notice, but it is not the disposition that transfers the legal estate.

Question 159: Under the Landlord and Tenant (Covenants) Act 1995, what is the position of an original tenant who assigns a commercial lease?

The original tenant remains liable for the entire lease term regardless of assignment
The original tenant is only released if the landlord expressly agrees to release them
Liability continues but only for rent obligations, not repair covenants
On assignment, the original tenant is automatically released from future obligations under the lease (Correct answer)

Correct answer: On assignment, the original tenant is automatically released from future obligations under the lease

Under the Landlord and Tenant (Covenants) Act 1995, when a tenant lawfully assigns a new tenancy (post-1996), the assigning tenant is automatically released from future covenant liability. This contrasts with the old law (pre-1996) where original tenants retained privity of contract liability.

Question 160: In the law of tort, what is the defence of 'contributory negligence'?

A defence requiring the claimant to have been completely sober
A complete defence that defeats the claimant's claim if the claimant was at all negligent
A defence only available in road traffic accident claims
A partial defence that reduces the claimant's damages by the proportion they contributed to their own loss (Correct answer)

Correct answer: A partial defence that reduces the claimant's damages by the proportion they contributed to their own loss

Under the Law Reform (Contributory Negligence) Act 1945, contributory negligence is a partial defence. If the claimant contributed to their own loss by their own negligence, their damages are reduced by the proportion they were responsible for, but their claim is not defeated entirely.

Question 161: A man dies intestate in England, leaving an estate valued at £900,000. He is survived by his wife and his mother. He has no children. According to the intestacy rules, how will his estate be distributed?

The wife receives all personal chattels, a statutory legacy of £322,000, and half of the remaining balance; the mother receives the other half.
The wife and the mother will share the entire estate equally.
The wife receives the entire estate. (Correct answer)
The wife receives the first £500,000 and the mother receives the remainder.

Correct answer: The wife receives the entire estate.

Under the rules of intestacy (Administration of Estates Act 1925, as amended), where the deceased is survived by a spouse or civil partner but no children or other issue, the surviving spouse or civil partner inherits the entire estate absolutely. The rules that provide for a statutory legacy and a split of the residue only apply when the deceased is survived by both a spouse and issue.

Question 162: In English civil litigation, at what stage of proceedings is 'disclosure' typically given?

Only in proceedings before the Supreme Court
At the trial itself, as documents are presented to the judge
Before proceedings are issued, as part of pre-action correspondence
After statements of case are filed, before witness statements are exchanged (Correct answer)

Correct answer: After statements of case are filed, before witness statements are exchanged

In civil litigation (multi-track cases), disclosure typically occurs after statements of case are exchanged and before witness statements and expert reports. The parties disclose documents they rely on and those that adversely affect their own case or support the other party's case.

Question 163: A courier, employed by a delivery company, gets into an argument with a customer on their doorstep about a delivery instruction. The argument escalates, and the courier, feeling insulted, follows the customer into their garden and assaults them. The customer sues the delivery company on the basis of vicarious liability. Based on the precedent in Mohamud v WM Morrison Supermarkets plc, is the company likely to be held vicariously liable?

No, because the courier was acting outside the scope of his duties, which were limited to delivering parcels at the door.
Yes, because the assault arose from an interaction that was directly within the courier's field of activities, which is interacting with customers. (Correct answer)
Yes, but only if the company had failed to carry out adequate background checks on the courier before employing him.
No, because the assault was an intentional criminal act, not a negligent one.

Correct answer: Yes, because the assault arose from an interaction that was directly within the courier's field of activities, which is interacting with customers.

The Supreme Court in *Mohamud v WM Morrison Supermarkets plc* established a two-stage test for vicarious liability: 1) Is the relationship one of employment or akin to employment? 2) Is the tort sufficiently closely connected with the employment? In *Mohamud*, an employee's assault on a customer, which started at his kiosk and continued on the forecourt, was deemed to be within the 'field of activities' assigned to him (attending to customers). The courier's argument and subsequent assault originated from his authorised duty of customer interaction, creating a sufficient connection to make the employer liable, even though the act itself was a gross abuse of his position. [3, 19, 42] The other options are incorrect as vicarious liability can apply to intentional torts, the 'field of activities' can be broadly interpreted, and the liability is strict, not dependent on the employer's own negligence.

Question 164: The standard of care expected of a professional in a negligence claim is assessed by reference to:

The highest standard achievable with current technology
The standard of a reasonable person with no professional expertise
The standard of the most skilled professional in the field
The standard of a reasonably competent professional in that field (the Bolam test) (Correct answer)

Correct answer: The standard of a reasonably competent professional in that field (the Bolam test)

The Bolam test (Bolam v Friern Hospital Management Committee [1957]) sets the standard as that of a reasonably competent professional in that field. A professional is not negligent if they act in accordance with a practice accepted as proper by a responsible body of professionals.

Question 165: What is the mens rea (mental element) of murder under English criminal law?

Knowledge that death would probably result
An intention to kill or an intention to cause grievous bodily harm (Correct answer)
Recklessness as to death or grievous bodily harm
Gross negligence

Correct answer: An intention to kill or an intention to cause grievous bodily harm

The mens rea of murder is malice aforethought — defined as an intention to kill or an intention to cause grievous bodily harm (GBH). Intention to cause GBH (even without intention to kill) is sufficient for a murder conviction if death results (R v Moloney [1985]).

Question 166: Under anti-money laundering regulations, what are the three key obligations on solicitors?

Legal advice privilege, confidentiality, and conflict checks
Client identification, record keeping, and fee disclosure
Customer due diligence, suspicious activity reporting, and maintaining appropriate policies and controls (Correct answer)
Registration with HMRC, annual audits, and staff training only

Correct answer: Customer due diligence, suspicious activity reporting, and maintaining appropriate policies and controls

Under the Money Laundering, Terrorist Financing and Transfer of Funds (Information on the Payer) Regulations 2017, solicitors must conduct customer due diligence (CDD), report suspicious activity to the NCA, and maintain appropriate internal policies, controls, and procedures.

Question 167: A testator signs her will in her kitchen. A neighbour, who is a beneficiary, is present and signs as the first witness. The testator then takes the will to an adjacent room where another neighbour signs as the second witness. The first witness is not present when the second witness signs. What is the legal effect of this situation on the will?

The will is invalid because a beneficiary cannot be a witness.
The will is invalid as it was not signed or acknowledged in the presence of two witnesses present at the same time. (Correct answer)
The will is valid, and the gift to the first witness is unaffected.
The will is valid, but the gift to the first witness fails.

Correct answer: The will is invalid as it was not signed or acknowledged in the presence of two witnesses present at the same time.

Section 9 of the Wills Act 1837 requires the testator to sign or acknowledge their signature 'in the presence of two or more witnesses present at the same time'. As the two witnesses were not present together when the testator's signature was made or acknowledged, this fundamental requirement has not been met, rendering the entire will invalid. While it is true that a gift to a beneficiary who acts as a witness would fail under s15 of the Act, the failure to comply with the s9 presence requirement is a more fundamental flaw that invalidates the will itself.

Question 168: Under the SRA Accounts Rules, what is the primary purpose of a client account?

To hold the firm's own money separately from its operating account
To safeguard client money received by a solicitor in connection with regulated services by holding it separately from the firm's own money (Correct answer)
To hold money pending completion of a property transaction only
To hold all money received by the firm including fees and disbursements

Correct answer: To safeguard client money received by a solicitor in connection with regulated services by holding it separately from the firm's own money

The SRA Accounts Rules require that client money must be held in a separate client account to protect clients' funds, ensuring they are not mixed with the firm's own money and remain available if the firm experiences financial difficulty.

Question 169: Under the Legal Services Act 2007, which body is responsible for oversight regulation of the Solicitors Regulation Authority?

The Competition and Markets Authority
The Ministry of Justice
The Legal Services Board (LSB) (Correct answer)
The Law Society

Correct answer: The Legal Services Board (LSB)

The Legal Services Board (LSB) is the independent oversight regulator established by the Legal Services Act 2007. It oversees the approved regulators (including the SRA) and ensures they operate in accordance with the regulatory objectives of the Act.

Question 170: In the law of attempts, a defendant is guilty of attempting to commit an offence when they:

Discuss plans to commit the offence with another person
Think about committing the offence
Merely prepare to commit the offence
Do an act which is more than merely preparatory to the commission of the offence (Correct answer)

Correct answer: Do an act which is more than merely preparatory to the commission of the offence

Under section 1 of the Criminal Attempts Act 1981, a person is guilty of attempting to commit an offence if, with intent to commit the offence, they do an act which is more than merely preparatory to the commission of the offence.

Question 171: Which organisation handles complaints about solicitors that cannot be resolved with the firm directly?

The Legal Services Board
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA)
The Law Society
The Legal Ombudsman (LeO) (Correct answer)

Correct answer: The Legal Ombudsman (LeO)

The Legal Ombudsman (LeO) handles complaints about legal service providers (including solicitors) that cannot be resolved at firm level. The SRA handles conduct matters (dishonesty, breach of professional standards); the Law Society is the representative body, not a regulator.

Question 172: Which of the following business decisions requires a special resolution of the members of a private limited company under the Companies Act 2006?

Changing the company's registered office address.
Declaring a final dividend for the financial year.
Appointing a new director to the board.
Altering the company's articles of association. (Correct answer)

Correct answer: Altering the company's articles of association.

A special resolution, which requires a majority of not less than 75% of the members' votes, is needed for significant constitutional changes. Under section 21 of the Companies Act 2006, a company can only amend its articles of association by passing a special resolution. Appointing a director and declaring a dividend typically require an ordinary resolution, and changing the registered office is a decision for the directors.

Question 173: A premature baby suffers blindness. A junior doctor's negligence meant the baby received excessive oxygen at one point, which is a known potential cause of the condition. However, there were four other non-negligent potential causes related to the premature birth. The claimant cannot prove on the balance of probabilities that the negligent oxygen administration was the specific cause. What is the likely outcome regarding causation, based on the principle in Wilsher v Essex Area Health Authority?

The claimant will succeed because the doctor's negligence materially increased the risk of the harm occurring.
The burden of proof will reverse, requiring the hospital to prove their negligence did not cause the blindness.
The claimant will fail because they cannot prove, on the balance of probabilities, that 'but for' the negligence, the harm would not have occurred. (Correct answer)
The court will apportion liability between the negligent cause and the non-negligent causes.

Correct answer: The claimant will fail because they cannot prove, on the balance of probabilities, that 'but for' the negligence, the harm would not have occurred.

The case of *Wilsher v Essex Area Health Authority* established that where there are several distinct potential causes of an injury, the claimant must still prove on the balance of probabilities that the defendant's negligence was the cause. [2, 9, 20] The 'but for' test applies. [27, 37] The House of Lords held that the 'material increase in risk' argument (from *McGhee*) does not apply in cases with multiple different causal agents. [9, 26] Therefore, as the claimant cannot establish that the negligence was the operative cause over the other four possibilities, the claim for causation will fail. The burden of proof does not reverse in such circumstances.

Question 174: What distinguishes joint enterprise liability from accessory liability under the Serious Crime Act 2007?

They are identical concepts
Joint enterprise only applies to summary offences
The Serious Crime Act only applies to terrorism offences
Joint enterprise requires a common plan between parties, while the Serious Crime Act addresses encouraging or assisting offences (Correct answer)

Correct answer: Joint enterprise requires a common plan between parties, while the Serious Crime Act addresses encouraging or assisting offences

Joint enterprise involves parties acting together under a common purpose (reformed by R v Jogee [2016]), whereas Part 2 of the Serious Crime Act 2007 creates inchoate offences of encouraging or assisting crime, which do not require a shared plan.

Question 175: Under the Civil Procedure Rules, what is the 'overriding objective'?

To enable the court to deal with cases justly and at proportionate cost (Correct answer)
To ensure all cases are decided in favour of the claimant where possible
To maximise the use of legal aid funding
To ensure cases proceed as quickly as possible regardless of costs

Correct answer: To enable the court to deal with cases justly and at proportionate cost

The overriding objective of the CPR (Rule 1.1) is to enable the court to deal with cases justly and at proportionate cost. This includes ensuring parties are on an equal footing, saving expense, dealing with cases in proportion to their value/complexity, and ensuring appropriate speed.

Question 176: A solicitor discovers that their client intends to use the solicitor's services to commit fraud. What must the solicitor do?

Continue acting as normal to protect client confidentiality
Advise the client on how to avoid detection
Cease acting for the client and consider making a report under the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (Correct answer)
Report the client to the police immediately without any further consideration

Correct answer: Cease acting for the client and consider making a report under the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002

If a solicitor discovers that their services are being used to facilitate fraud, they must cease acting. They should also consider their obligations under the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (POCA) to make a suspicious activity report (SAR) to the National Crime Agency.

Question 177: What is an 'easement' in land law?

A right to use someone else's land for a specific purpose that benefits the dominant tenement (Correct answer)
A restriction on how land can be used
The obligation to maintain a boundary wall
A right to take something from the land (such as fish or game)

Correct answer: A right to use someone else's land for a specific purpose that benefits the dominant tenement

An easement is a proprietary right that benefits one piece of land (the dominant tenement) and burdens another (the servient tenement), allowing specific use of the servient land (e.g., a right of way, right of light, or right of drainage).

Question 178: What is 'alternative dispute resolution' (ADR) and what is the court's attitude to parties who unreasonably refuse to engage in it?

ADR includes mediation, arbitration, and negotiation; courts may impose costs sanctions on parties who unreasonably refuse to engage (Correct answer)
ADR is optional and courts take no view on a party's refusal to participate
ADR only applies to commercial disputes above £1 million
ADR is compulsory for all civil claims before proceedings can be issued

Correct answer: ADR includes mediation, arbitration, and negotiation; courts may impose costs sanctions on parties who unreasonably refuse to engage

ADR encompasses mediation, arbitration, early neutral evaluation, and other non-court dispute resolution methods. Courts actively encourage ADR and can impose costs penalties on parties who unreasonably refuse to engage (Halsey v Milton Keynes NHS Trust [2004]; revised guidance encourages stronger judicial promotion of ADR).

Question 179: Three individuals form a general partnership to run a catering business but do not create a written partnership agreement. One partner, without the knowledge of the others, takes out a substantial loan in the business's name from a supplier to fund a personal holiday. The supplier was unaware of the loan's purpose. What is the liability of the other partners for this debt?

Only the partner who took out the loan is liable as it was for personal use.
All partners are jointly liable for the full amount of the debt. (Correct answer)
The partners are liable, but only up to the amount of their capital contribution.
No partners are liable as the loan was not for the benefit of the business.

Correct answer: All partners are jointly liable for the full amount of the debt.

Under the Partnership Act 1890, each partner is an agent of the firm and the other partners for the purpose of the business of the partnership. Any act done by a partner for carrying on in the usual way business of the kind carried on by the firm binds the firm and its partners. Since borrowing money can be considered within the usual course of business for a catering company, and the supplier was unaware of the improper purpose, the act binds the firm. Section 9 of the Act establishes that every partner in a firm is liable jointly with the other partners for all debts and obligations of the firm incurred while they are a partner.

Question 180: A solicitor is acting for a client in a high-value commercial litigation case. During a meeting, the client discloses that they intend to use the proceeds from the litigation, if successful, to fund a criminal enterprise. The solicitor is concerned about their professional obligations. Which of the following statements most accurately describes the solicitor's duty of confidentiality in this situation?

The solicitor should cease to act for the client due to the conflict but must maintain confidentiality regarding the client's stated intention.
The solicitor must immediately report their client's intention to the police, as the 'iniquity' principle overrides the duty of confidentiality.
The solicitor is permitted, but not required, to disclose the information to the relevant authorities to prevent a future criminal act. (Correct answer)
The solicitor must not disclose the information as the duty of confidentiality to their client is absolute and paramount in all circumstances.

Correct answer: The solicitor is permitted, but not required, to disclose the information to the relevant authorities to prevent a future criminal act.

A solicitor's duty of confidentiality, under paragraph 6.3 of the SRA Code of Conduct, is a fundamental professional obligation. However, it is not absolute. While information furthering a criminal purpose is not privileged, the SRA guidance indicates that disclosure to prevent a future criminal act is permitted, particularly where it may prevent serious bodily harm, but it is not a mandatory requirement in every case. Ceasing to act is also appropriate, but the key ethical issue tested is the scope of the duty of confidentiality. Making an immediate report is not necessarily the correct step without careful consideration, and the duty is certainly not absolute.

Question 181: A buyer and seller exchange contracts for the sale of a freehold house. The contract incorporates the Standard Conditions of Sale (Fifth Edition - 2018 Revision) without amendment. Between exchange and completion, a storm causes significant damage to the roof of the property. Which of the following statements most accurately describes the legal position?

The risk is shared equally between the buyer and the seller, and the purchase price must be renegotiated.
The buyer bears the risk and must proceed with completion at the full purchase price, but may be able to claim on the seller's insurance policy. (Correct answer)
The seller bears the risk and must repair the damage before completion, or the buyer can rescind the contract.
The contract is automatically frustrated, and both parties are discharged from their obligations.

Correct answer: The buyer bears the risk and must proceed with completion at the full purchase price, but may be able to claim on the seller's insurance policy.

Under the Standard Conditions of Sale (Fifth Edition - 2018 Revision), condition 5.1.1 states that the property is at the buyer's risk from the date of the contract (exchange). Therefore, the buyer must still complete the purchase. However, condition 5.1.3 requires the seller, if they are obliged to insure (which they often are under a separate mortgage or as a prudent measure), to hold any policy monies received in trust for the buyer or assign the right to claim. Thus, the buyer's primary recourse is often through the seller's insurance.

Question 182: Under the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999, when can a third party enforce a contractual term?

Only in contracts for the sale of goods
Only when both original parties agree to allow enforcement
Always, if they benefit from the contract
When the contract expressly provides for it, or the term purports to confer a benefit on them and the parties intended the term to be enforceable by them (Correct answer)

Correct answer: When the contract expressly provides for it, or the term purports to confer a benefit on them and the parties intended the term to be enforceable by them

Under the Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act 1999, a third party can enforce a contractual term if: (a) the contract expressly provides they may do so, or (b) the term purports to confer a benefit on them, unless it appears the parties did not intend the term to be enforceable by the third party.

Question 183: The 'eggshell skull rule' in tort law means that:

A claimant with a pre-existing condition cannot claim damages
A defendant is only liable for foreseeable injuries
A defendant must take the claimant as they find them, including any pre-existing vulnerabilities (Correct answer)
The defendant is liable for the most probable injury only

Correct answer: A defendant must take the claimant as they find them, including any pre-existing vulnerabilities

The eggshell skull rule (thin skull rule) provides that a defendant must take the claimant as they find them. If the claimant has a pre-existing vulnerability that makes the injury worse, the defendant is liable for the full extent of the damage.

Question 184: The SRA's seven Principles (2019) include acting with integrity. Which Principle requires solicitors to act with independence?

Principle 5
Principle 4 (Correct answer)
Principle 3
Principle 2

Correct answer: Principle 4

Principle 4 of the SRA Principles 2019 requires solicitors to act with honesty. Principle 3 requires them to act with independence. The SRA Principles rank in priority order: the first two (public interest and rule of law) take precedence over all others.

Question 185: Which type of term, implied by the courts, is based on the presumed intention of the parties in a specific contract?

A term implied by custom
A term implied by statute
A term implied in law
A term implied in fact (Correct answer)

Correct answer: A term implied in fact

Terms implied in fact are implied based on the presumed intention of the specific parties to fill a gap in that particular contract (using the business efficacy or officious bystander tests). Terms implied in law apply automatically to all contracts of a particular type.

Question 186: In which of the following circumstances would a statement made during 'without prejudice' negotiations be admissible in court proceedings?

To prove that a binding settlement agreement was reached during the negotiations. (Correct answer)
To demonstrate that the other party was acting unreasonably by refusing to mediate.
To argue about the costs of the proceedings after judgment has been given.
To show that the party making the statement has admitted liability.

Correct answer: To prove that a binding settlement agreement was reached during the negotiations.

The 'without prejudice' rule prevents statements made in a genuine attempt to settle a dispute from being put before the court as evidence of admissions. However, there are established exceptions to this rule. One key exception is where the negotiations lead to a concluded settlement agreement, and a dispute arises about whether an agreement was reached or what its terms were. In that situation, the without prejudice communications can be admitted to prove the existence and terms of the settlement contract.

Question 187: A brother and sister agree that if the sister lends the brother £5,000 to start a new business, he will give her a 10% stake in the company. They write down the terms on a piece of paper and both sign it. Six months later, the business is successful, but the brother refuses to transfer the shares. Which legal principle will be most relevant in determining if a binding contract exists?

The 'mirror image' rule of offer and acceptance.
The requirement for certainty of terms.
The presumption regarding the intention to create legal relations in social and domestic agreements. (Correct answer)
The doctrine of consideration.

Correct answer: The presumption regarding the intention to create legal relations in social and domestic agreements.

In English law, there is a rebuttable presumption that agreements made in a social or domestic context, such as between family members, are not intended to be legally binding. While the agreement involves business matters, the core relationship is domestic. The court would need to determine if the presumption has been rebutted by the evidence, such as the written and signed document, which suggests a more formal, commercial intent. The case of Balfour v Balfour established this presumption, while cases like Merritt v Merritt show it can be rebutted.

Question 188: A solicitor is instructed to serve a claim form on an individual defendant within the jurisdiction of England and Wales. The solicitor posts the claim form by first-class post on a Monday. According to the Civil Procedure Rules, on which day is the claim form deemed to be served?

On the Friday, if it was not returned as undelivered.
On the Monday it was posted.
On the Wednesday, the second business day after it was posted. (Correct answer)
On the Tuesday, the day after it was posted.

Correct answer: On the Wednesday, the second business day after it was posted.

Under CPR 6.14, a claim form served by first-class post is deemed to be served on the second business day after it was posted, provided that day is a business day. If the claim form is posted on a Monday, the second business day after posting is Wednesday. This deemed date of service is crucial for calculating the deadlines for subsequent steps, such as filing an acknowledgment of service or a defence.

Question 189: What is the consequence where a trust fails for conceptual uncertainty in its objects?

The court applies a 'wait and see' rule
The trustees have a discretion to distribute as they see fit
The trust is void (Correct answer)
The court severs the uncertain part and upholds the remainder

Correct answer: The trust is void

If the class of beneficiaries cannot be defined with conceptual certainty, the trust is void because no court can determine who qualifies or administer the trust.

Question 190: What is 'legal professional privilege' and what does it protect?

The right to refuse to answer court questions about any client matter
The right to withhold confidential communications between solicitor and client made for the purpose of legal advice or litigation from compulsory disclosure (Correct answer)
A solicitor's right to charge higher fees for complex matters
A solicitor's immunity from personal liability for negligent advice

Correct answer: The right to withhold confidential communications between solicitor and client made for the purpose of legal advice or litigation from compulsory disclosure

Legal professional privilege (LPP) protects confidential communications between solicitor and client from compulsory disclosure. It covers legal advice privilege (advice/instructions) and litigation privilege (communications made for the dominant purpose of actual or reasonably anticipated litigation).

Question 191: What is 'diminished responsibility' as a partial defence to murder under the Homicide Act 1957 (as amended by the Coroners and Justice Act 2009)?

A defence available only to defendants with a documented psychiatric history
A defence based on the defendant having a below-average IQ
A full acquittal based on mental illness
A partial defence reducing murder to manslaughter where the defendant suffered an abnormality of mental functioning arising from a recognised medical condition that substantially impaired their responsibility (Correct answer)

Correct answer: A partial defence reducing murder to manslaughter where the defendant suffered an abnormality of mental functioning arising from a recognised medical condition that substantially impaired their responsibility

Diminished responsibility (s.2 Homicide Act 1957, as amended) reduces murder to voluntary manslaughter. It requires: an abnormality of mental functioning; arising from a recognised medical condition; which substantially impaired the defendant's ability to understand their conduct, form a rational judgment, or exercise self-control; and which provides an explanation for the killing.

Question 192: Under the Legal Services Act 2007, which body is the oversight regulator for all approved legal regulators?

The Law Society
The Solicitors Regulation Authority
The Legal Services Board (Correct answer)
The Bar Standards Board

Correct answer: The Legal Services Board

The Legal Services Board (LSB) was established by the Legal Services Act 2007 as the oversight regulator. It oversees approved regulators including the SRA (solicitors), BSB (barristers), and CILEx Regulation (legal executives).

Question 193: What is the solicitor's lien and when can it be exercised?

The right to transfer a client's file to another firm without consent to recover fees
The right of a solicitor to retain a client's documents and property pending payment of outstanding fees (possessory lien), and in some cases a charge over funds recovered in litigation (charging lien) (Correct answer)
The right to issue proceedings against a client without a warning letter
The right to charge interest on unpaid bills from the first day they are issued

Correct answer: The right of a solicitor to retain a client's documents and property pending payment of outstanding fees (possessory lien), and in some cases a charge over funds recovered in litigation (charging lien)

A solicitor's lien includes: a possessory lien (retaining papers and property until fees are paid) and a charging lien (an equitable charge over property recovered or preserved through the solicitor's efforts in litigation). The lien is subject to the court's discretion to order delivery up of documents.

Question 194: In determining certainty of intention, which statement best reflects the current legal position after Re Adams and the Kensington Vestry?

Precatory words such as 'I hope' or 'I wish' are sufficient to create a binding trust
Courts examine the substance of the language to determine whether a mandatory obligation was intended (Correct answer)
A trust can only be validly created by deed
The word 'trust' must appear explicitly in the document

Correct answer: Courts examine the substance of the language to determine whether a mandatory obligation was intended

After Re Adams and the Kensington Vestry, precatory words are generally insufficient; courts look at the overall substance of the language to determine whether a mandatory, binding obligation was imposed on the recipient.

Question 195: What is 'vicarious liability' in the law of tort?

The liability of one party (e.g., an employer) for the tortious acts of another (e.g., an employee) committed in the course of employment (Correct answer)
The liability of a director for their company's acts
Personal liability for acts of independent contractors
The liability of an employee for their employer's negligence

Correct answer: The liability of one party (e.g., an employer) for the tortious acts of another (e.g., an employee) committed in the course of employment

Vicarious liability makes an employer liable for tortious acts committed by an employee in the course of their employment, even if the employer was not personally negligent. The employee must also remain personally liable.

Question 196: What three-stage test was established in Caparo Industries plc v Dickman [1990] for determining whether a duty of care exists?

Foreseeability, proximity, and whether it is fair, just, and reasonable to impose a duty (Correct answer)
Negligence, causation, and loss
Proximity, causation, and remoteness
Duty, breach, and damage

Correct answer: Foreseeability, proximity, and whether it is fair, just, and reasonable to impose a duty

The Caparo test requires: (1) foreseeability of harm, (2) a relationship of proximity between claimant and defendant, and (3) that it is fair, just, and reasonable to impose a duty of care.

Question 197: In Stack v Dowden [2007], the House of Lords held that where unmarried cohabitants hold the legal title to a family home jointly, the starting presumption is that:

Beneficial interests must always be equal regardless of contributions
Beneficial interests are presumed equal but this can be rebutted by the whole course of dealing between the parties (Correct answer)
The beneficial interest follows financial contributions only
Legal and beneficial interests always mirror each other

Correct answer: Beneficial interests are presumed equal but this can be rebutted by the whole course of dealing between the parties

Stack v Dowden established a strong presumption of equal beneficial ownership for jointly-held property, but this presumption can be displaced by examining the whole course of dealing including non-financial factors.

Question 198: What is the significance of legal professional privilege in the context of solicitor-client communications?

It allows solicitors to withhold documents from discovery in all circumstances
It can be waived by the court at any time
It protects confidential communications between solicitor and client made for the purpose of giving or receiving legal advice from disclosure (Correct answer)
It only applies to communications during litigation

Correct answer: It protects confidential communications between solicitor and client made for the purpose of giving or receiving legal advice from disclosure

Legal professional privilege (comprising legal advice privilege and litigation privilege) protects confidential communications between solicitor and client made for the purpose of giving or receiving legal advice. It is a fundamental right that cannot be overridden by the court except in very limited circumstances.

Question 199: What is the defence of 'loss of control' under the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 and how does it differ from the old provocation defence?

It is identical to the old provocation defence with no substantive changes
It requires a qualifying trigger (sexual infidelity alone is excluded), a loss of control (not necessarily sudden), and that a person of the defendant's age and sex with normal tolerance would have reacted similarly (Correct answer)
It applies only to domestic violence situations
It is available only to defendants with a diagnosed mental illness

Correct answer: It requires a qualifying trigger (sexual infidelity alone is excluded), a loss of control (not necessarily sudden), and that a person of the defendant's age and sex with normal tolerance would have reacted similarly

Under the Coroners and Justice Act 2009 (ss.54-55), loss of control replaces provocation. Key changes: the loss of control need not be sudden; sexual infidelity alone cannot be a qualifying trigger; the trigger must be either a fear of serious violence or circumstances of an extremely grave character that caused the defendant to have a justifiable sense of being seriously wronged.

Question 200: In the law of contract, what is 'anticipatory breach'?

A clear indication by one party before the performance date that they will not perform their contractual obligations (Correct answer)
A breach caused by a party anticipating market changes
A breach that occurs at the agreed time for performance
A breach for which damages are calculated in advance

Correct answer: A clear indication by one party before the performance date that they will not perform their contractual obligations

Anticipatory breach occurs when, before the date for performance, one party makes clear (expressly or by conduct) that they will not perform their obligations. The innocent party can immediately treat the contract as terminated and sue for damages without waiting for the performance date.

Question 201: Under the Consumer Protection Act 1987, liability for defective products is:

Strict — no need to prove fault by the producer (Correct answer)
Only available against retailers
Limited to contractual claims only
Based on fault — the claimant must prove negligence

Correct answer: Strict — no need to prove fault by the producer

The Consumer Protection Act 1987 imposes strict liability on producers of defective products. The claimant need not prove negligence, only that the product was defective and caused damage.

Question 202: What is the role of 'requisitions on title' in a conveyancing transaction?

Planning authority queries about proposed use of the property
The seller's formal offer to sell at a set price
The buyer's solicitor's written enquiries to the seller's solicitor about title and other matters arising from deduction of title (Correct answer)
The Land Registry's questions about the application for registration

Correct answer: The buyer's solicitor's written enquiries to the seller's solicitor about title and other matters arising from deduction of title

Requisitions on title are written questions raised by the buyer's solicitor to the seller's solicitor following review of the title documentation, seeking clarification or resolution of queries about the title before exchange of contracts.

Question 203: A legal mortgagee's power of sale has arisen and become exercisable due to the mortgagor's persistent failure to make mortgage payments. The mortgagee intends to sell the property. What is the primary duty owed by the mortgagee to the mortgagor when conducting the sale?

To sell the property only by public auction to ensure maximum transparency.
To take reasonable care to obtain the best price reasonably obtainable at the time of the sale. (Correct answer)
To ensure the property is sold for a price that fully repays the outstanding mortgage debt, interest, and costs.
To obtain the highest possible price, even if it means waiting for several months for market conditions to improve.

Correct answer: To take reasonable care to obtain the best price reasonably obtainable at the time of the sale.

The established duty of a mortgagee when exercising its power of sale is to act in good faith and to take reasonable care to obtain the 'true market value' or the 'best price reasonably obtainable' at the time of sale. This duty was outlined in cases such as *Cuckmere Brick Co v Mutual Finance Ltd*. The mortgagee is not obliged to wait for the market to improve, nor is their duty simply to cover the debt; they must consider the mortgagor's interest in any surplus equity. They can choose the method of sale (e.g., auction or private treaty) as long as it is a reasonable choice in the circumstances.

Question 204: Under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975, who can make a claim against a deceased's estate?

Any creditor of the deceased
Only the deceased's parents if they were dependants
A specified class including the deceased's spouse, civil partner, former spouse (not remarried), children, treated-as-a-child persons, and dependants (Correct answer)
Only the deceased's children

Correct answer: A specified class including the deceased's spouse, civil partner, former spouse (not remarried), children, treated-as-a-child persons, and dependants

The Inheritance Act 1975 allows a defined class to apply for reasonable financial provision from the estate: spouses/civil partners, former spouses/CPs (not remarried), children (including adult children), persons treated as children of the family, and dependants.

Question 205: What is the mens rea for murder under English law?

Gross negligence leading to death
Negligence causing death
Intention to cause grievous bodily harm or kill (Correct answer)
Recklessness as to causing death

Correct answer: Intention to cause grievous bodily harm or kill

The mens rea for murder is malice aforethought, which encompasses either an intention to kill or an intention to cause grievous bodily harm (GBH). This was confirmed in R v Vickers [1957] and R v Cunningham [1982].

Question 206: A party is induced to enter into a contract due to a fraudulent misrepresentation. Which of the following remedies is available to the innocent party?

Rescission of the contract and damages. (Correct answer)
Rescission of the contract only.
Damages only.
Specific performance only.

Correct answer: Rescission of the contract and damages.

Where a fraudulent misrepresentation has occurred, the innocent party has the right to rescind the contract (i.e., set it aside and be restored to their pre-contractual position) and can also claim damages for the tort of deceit. The aim of the damages is to put the claimant back in the position they would have been in had the misrepresentation not been made. The other options are incorrect as they represent an incomplete list of the available remedies for this specific type of misrepresentation.

Question 207: Under the SRA Code of Conduct, what is the solicitor's duty when a client asks them to do something that the solicitor believes is dishonest?

Report the instruction to the SRA before doing anything further
Complete the task while noting their concern in the file
Decline to follow the instruction and, if the client insists, cease acting (Correct answer)
Follow the instruction if the client provides written authority

Correct answer: Decline to follow the instruction and, if the client insists, cease acting

A solicitor must never act dishonestly or assist a client in doing so. If a client instructs a solicitor to act dishonestly and insists on it, the solicitor must refuse the instruction and, if the client maintains their position, the solicitor must cease acting and may need to consider reporting obligations.

Question 208: What is the effect of section 3 of the Human Rights Act 1998 on statutory interpretation?

Courts can only apply Convention rights to public authorities
Courts must refer all human rights questions to the European Court of Human Rights
Courts must strike down any legislation incompatible with Convention rights
Courts must, so far as possible, read and give effect to legislation in a way compatible with Convention rights (Correct answer)

Correct answer: Courts must, so far as possible, read and give effect to legislation in a way compatible with Convention rights

Section 3 of the HRA 1998 imposes a strong interpretive obligation: courts must read and give effect to primary and subordinate legislation, so far as it is possible to do so, in a way that is compatible with Convention rights.

Question 209: Which of the following statements accurately describes the primary duty of Personal Representatives (PRs) when administering an estate in the UK?

To collect the deceased's assets, pay all debts and liabilities, and distribute the net estate according to the will or intestacy rules. (Correct answer)
To prioritise the payment of legacies to beneficiaries before settling any of the deceased's outstanding debts.
To invest the estate assets in high-growth funds to maximise the value for the beneficiaries.
To follow the verbal instructions of the main beneficiaries to ensure family harmony.

Correct answer: To collect the deceased's assets, pay all debts and liabilities, and distribute the net estate according to the will or intestacy rules.

The fundamental duty of Personal Representatives (executors or administrators) is to administer the estate correctly. This involves a clear process: first, to collect and get in all the assets of the deceased; second, to pay the funeral, testamentary, and administration expenses, along with all debts and liabilities; and finally, to distribute the net estate to the persons entitled to it, either under the terms of the will or the rules of intestacy.

Question 210: What is a 'retainer' in the context of a solicitor-client relationship?

A document granting a solicitor power of attorney
The contractual agreement between solicitor and client defining the scope of the work to be undertaken and the terms of the engagement (Correct answer)
The solicitor's right to retain client documents pending payment of fees
The amount a client must pay upfront before work begins

Correct answer: The contractual agreement between solicitor and client defining the scope of the work to be undertaken and the terms of the engagement

A retainer is the contract between solicitor and client that defines the scope of the legal services to be provided, the terms on which they will be provided (including costs), and each party's obligations. It forms the basis of the professional relationship.

Question 211: Under English law, what is the minimum age of criminal responsibility?

10 years old (Correct answer)
14 years old
12 years old
8 years old

Correct answer: 10 years old

The age of criminal responsibility in England and Wales is 10 years old, as set by the Children and Young Persons Act 1963. Children under 10 are conclusively presumed to be incapable of committing a criminal offence (doli incapax).

Question 212: In the tort of defamation, what is the key distinction between libel and slander?

Libel is about public figures; slander is about private individuals
Libel applies to corporations; slander applies to individuals
Slander requires malice; libel does not
Libel is defamation in permanent form (e.g., written/broadcast); slander is defamation in transient form (e.g., spoken) (Correct answer)

Correct answer: Libel is defamation in permanent form (e.g., written/broadcast); slander is defamation in transient form (e.g., spoken)

Libel is defamation in a permanent form (writing, broadcast, film), while slander is in transient form (spoken words, gestures). Libel is actionable per se (without proof of special damage); most slander requires proof of actual damage.

Question 213: Under the SRA Code, what is a solicitor's obligation regarding costs information provided to clients?

Solicitors must give clients the best possible information about the likely overall cost of their matter, both at the outset and when circumstances change that affect costs (Correct answer)
Only a written estimate signed by both parties satisfies the costs obligation
Costs information need only be given for matters expected to exceed £10,000
Costs need only be discussed if the client asks

Correct answer: Solicitors must give clients the best possible information about the likely overall cost of their matter, both at the outset and when circumstances change that affect costs

The SRA Code requires solicitors to give clients the best possible information about the likely overall cost of their matter at the outset and to update that information when circumstances change. This must be clear enough for the client to make informed decisions.

Question 214: Under the law of agency, what does 'apparent authority' mean?

Authority granted by a court when the agent has exceeded their actual authority
The actual authority given to an agent by the principal
The authority the agent appears to have based on the principal's conduct or representations, even if actual authority is absent (Correct answer)
The minimum authority needed to bind a principal

Correct answer: The authority the agent appears to have based on the principal's conduct or representations, even if actual authority is absent

Apparent (or ostensible) authority arises when a principal's words or conduct lead a third party to reasonably believe the agent has authority to act, even if that authority was not actually given or has been revoked. The principal is then bound by the agent's acts.

Question 215: A homeowner is confronted by an unarmed burglar in their kitchen. The homeowner genuinely but mistakenly believes the burglar is reaching for a weapon. The homeowner grabs a heavy frying pan and strikes the burglar once on the head, causing a significant injury. In relation to the common law defence of self-defence, which statement most accurately describes how a court would assess the homeowner's action?

The force used will be judged against the facts as the homeowner genuinely believed them to be, and the key question will be whether the force was reasonable in those circumstances. (Correct answer)
The defence will fail because the mistake was unreasonable.
The defence is only available if the force used was not disproportionate, regardless of the homeowner's belief.
The defence will automatically succeed because it is a 'householder case' and the burglar was a trespasser.

Correct answer: The force used will be judged against the facts as the homeowner genuinely believed them to be, and the key question will be whether the force was reasonable in those circumstances.

The law on self-defence, particularly under section 76 of the Criminal Justice and Immigration Act 2008, states that a defendant is to be judged on the circumstances as they subjectively and genuinely believed them to be, even if that belief was mistaken. The reasonableness of the belief is only relevant to whether it was genuinely held. Once the subjective facts are established, the key question is whether the force used was objectively reasonable in those circumstances. While 'householder cases' have a slightly different standard (the force must not be 'grossly disproportionate'), the core test remains one of reasonableness based on the defendant's genuine belief.

Question 216: A solicitor receives a single electronic payment of £10,000 from a new client. The client's instructions state that £8,000 is to be held on account for the purchase price in a conveyancing transaction, and £2,000 is for the firm's agreed fixed fee. What is the correct procedure for handling this mixed receipt under the SRA Accounts Rules?

Pay the full £10,000 into the business account and immediately transfer £8,000 to the client account.
Pay the full £10,000 into the client account and then promptly transfer £2,000 to the business account. (Correct answer)
Request the client to make two separate payments, one to the client account and one to the business account.
Pay £8,000 into the client account and £2,000 into the business account directly from the firm's holding account.

Correct answer: Pay the full £10,000 into the client account and then promptly transfer £2,000 to the business account.

SRA Accounts Rule 4.1 requires client money to be kept separate. When a mixed payment is received, Rule 4.2 allows for the entire sum to be paid into a client account, but the firm must then 'promptly' allocate the funds to the correct accounts. This means the firm's own money (£2,000) must be transferred to the business account without delay, leaving the client money protected in the client account.

Question 217: The defence of contributory negligence under the Law Reform (Contributory Negligence) Act 1945 results in:

The claim being struck out
A complete defence that bars the claim entirely
A reduction in damages proportionate to the claimant's fault (Correct answer)
An automatic 50% reduction in damages

Correct answer: A reduction in damages proportionate to the claimant's fault

Under the 1945 Act, contributory negligence is a partial defence. The court reduces the claimant's damages by a percentage that reflects their share of responsibility for the harm suffered.

Question 218: Under the neighbour principle established in Donoghue v Stevenson [1932], a duty of care is owed to:

Persons so closely and directly affected by one's act that one ought reasonably to have them in contemplation (Correct answer)
Only persons in a contractual relationship
Only persons within physical proximity
Everyone in the world

Correct answer: Persons so closely and directly affected by one's act that one ought reasonably to have them in contemplation

Lord Atkin's neighbour principle in Donoghue v Stevenson established that a duty of care is owed to persons so closely and directly affected by one's act that one ought reasonably to have them in contemplation when directing one's mind to the acts or omissions in question.

Question 219: To comply with the SRA Accounts Rules, what is the maximum permitted interval between completing client account reconciliations?

At least every quarter.
At least every five weeks. (Correct answer)
Every two weeks.
Every calendar month.

Correct answer: At least every five weeks.

SRA Accounts Rule 8.3 requires that a firm must complete a reconciliation of its client accounts at least every five weeks. This reconciliation must compare the bank statement balance with the cash book balance and the total of the client ledger balances, and must be signed off by the COFA or a manager of the firm.

Question 220: Under the SRA Code of Conduct, what must a solicitor do if they discover they have made a mistake in handling a client's matter?

Wait until the end of the matter before disclosing any errors
Inform the client promptly of the mistake and any steps being taken to remedy it, and consider whether to refer the client to independent legal advice about the error (Correct answer)
Conceal the mistake to avoid embarrassment and potential claims
Only disclose the mistake if the client directly asks

Correct answer: Inform the client promptly of the mistake and any steps being taken to remedy it, and consider whether to refer the client to independent legal advice about the error

The SRA Code of Conduct requires solicitors to be honest with clients about issues affecting their matter. Where a mistake occurs, the solicitor must inform the client promptly, explain what has happened, what remedial steps are being taken, and consider whether the client should obtain independent advice about the error.

Question 221: The Sewel Convention provides that the UK Parliament will not normally legislate on devolved matters without:

A two-thirds majority in the House of Commons
Approval from the Privy Council
A referendum in the devolved nation
The consent of the relevant devolved legislature (Correct answer)

Correct answer: The consent of the relevant devolved legislature

The Sewel Convention (now also recognised in section 2 of the Scotland Act 2016) provides that the UK Parliament will not normally legislate on devolved matters without the consent of the relevant devolved legislature. However, as the Supreme Court confirmed in Miller, it is a political convention, not legally enforceable.

Question 222: Which of the following statements provides the most accurate description of the doctrine of Parliamentary Sovereignty in the UK constitution?

The courts can invalidate an Act of Parliament if it conflicts with fundamental constitutional principles.
Parliament can legislate on any subject matter, and no other body has the legal authority to override or set aside an Act of Parliament. (Correct answer)
The Royal Prerogative allows the executive to create laws that take precedence over Acts of Parliament.
Devolution has transferred ultimate sovereign power to the legislatures in Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland.

Correct answer: Parliament can legislate on any subject matter, and no other body has the legal authority to override or set aside an Act of Parliament.

The classic Diceyan definition of Parliamentary Sovereignty holds that Parliament has the right to make or unmake any law, and no person or body can override its legislation. [9, 12, 27] While the courts can interpret statutes and, under the Human Rights Act 1998, issue declarations of incompatibility, they cannot invalidate primary legislation. [12] The Royal Prerogative is subordinate to statute, and devolution does not diminish the ultimate sovereignty of the Westminster Parliament.

Question 223: A woman owned a large house with an adjoining cottage, both set in extensive grounds. She lived in the house and, for many years, accessed the cottage via a clearly defined and tarmacked driveway that crossed the grounds of the main house. She then sold the cottage to a buyer, but the transfer deed made no mention of any right of way over the driveway. The woman now seeks to prevent the buyer from using the driveway. On what basis is the buyer most likely to establish a legal right of way over the driveway?

By claiming a prescriptive easement.
By claiming an easement of necessity.
Under the rule in *Wheeldon v Burrows*. (Correct answer)
By virtue of section 62 of the Law of Property Act 1925.

Correct answer: Under the rule in *Wheeldon v Burrows*.

The rule in *Wheeldon v Burrows* implies the grant of easements into a conveyance of part of a larger piece of land. The rule applies where the right was 'continuous and apparent' and 'necessary for the reasonable enjoyment' of the part sold, which is the case here with a visible, tarmacked drive that was used to access the cottage before the sale. An easement of necessity is unlikely as it requires the land to be otherwise landlocked. Section 62 is less likely to apply as there was no prior diversity of occupation. Prescription requires 20 years of use as of right, which hasn't occurred since the sale.

Question 224: Under section 1 of the Trustee Act 2000, what is the standard of care required of a trustee when exercising statutory functions such as investment?

Such care and skill as is reasonable in the circumstances, having regard to any special knowledge or experience (Correct answer)
The standard of the most cautious, prudent investor at all times
An absolute duty to maximise financial returns for beneficiaries
The standard of the ordinary professional investor regardless of the trustee's background

Correct answer: Such care and skill as is reasonable in the circumstances, having regard to any special knowledge or experience

Section 1 of the Trustee Act 2000 requires trustees to exercise such care and skill as is reasonable in the circumstances, and where a trustee acts in a professional capacity, a higher standard applies by virtue of their specialist knowledge.

Question 225: A widow dies leaving an estate worth £950,000. Her main residence within the estate is valued at £400,000. In her will, she leaves her entire estate to her adult son. Her husband died three years earlier, leaving his entire estate to her and having made no lifetime gifts. What is the total available Nil Rate Band (including any transferable and residence allowances) that can be set against her estate for Inheritance Tax purposes?

£650,000
£500,000
£325,000
£1,000,000 (Correct answer)

Correct answer: £1,000,000

The widow's estate can claim her own Nil Rate Band (NRB) of £325,000 and her own Residence Nil Rate Band (RNRB) of £175,000, as the main residence is being left to a direct descendant. Because her husband left his entire estate to her (an exempt transfer), his NRB and RNRB were unused and are fully transferable to her estate. This adds a further £325,000 (transferable NRB) and £175,000 (transferable RNRB). The total available allowances are therefore (£325,000 + £175,000) + (£325,000 + £175,000) = £1,000,000.

Question 226: What is 'testamentary capacity' and which case established the legal test for it?

The physical ability to write a will; established in Banks v Goodfellow (1870)
The requirement that the testator be over 18; established in the Wills Act 1837
The legal and mental capacity to make a valid will; the test was established in Banks v Goodfellow (1870) (Correct answer)
A formal assessment by a psychiatrist; required for all testators over 70

Correct answer: The legal and mental capacity to make a valid will; the test was established in Banks v Goodfellow (1870)

Testamentary capacity (Banks v Goodfellow [1870]) requires the testator to: understand the nature of making a will and its effects; understand the extent of the property being disposed of; comprehend the claims of those who might expect to benefit; and not suffer from any disorder of the mind affecting those faculties.

Question 227: Under the Human Rights Act 1998, what must UK courts do when they find that primary legislation is incompatible with a Convention right?

Strike down the legislation as invalid
Issue a declaration of incompatibility under section 4 (Correct answer)
Automatically amend the legislation
Refer the matter to the European Court of Human Rights

Correct answer: Issue a declaration of incompatibility under section 4

Under section 4 of the Human Rights Act 1998, courts can issue a declaration of incompatibility if they find primary legislation is incompatible with a Convention right. This does not affect the validity of the legislation — it remains in force unless Parliament decides to amend it.

Question 228: In the tort of private nuisance, which of the following factors is NOT typically considered by the court?

The wealth of the defendant (Correct answer)
The locality of the interference
The duration of the interference
The claimant's sensitivity to the interference

Correct answer: The wealth of the defendant

Courts consider locality, duration, frequency, and the nature of the interference when assessing private nuisance. The defendant's wealth is not a relevant factor in determining whether a nuisance exists.

Question 229: A UK limited company is facing severe financial distress. Its directors believe the business is fundamentally viable but needs protection from creditor action to allow for a restructuring plan to be implemented. Which insolvency procedure is most appropriate for this objective?

Members' Voluntary Liquidation
Compulsory Liquidation
Administration (Correct answer)
Company Voluntary Arrangement (CVA)

Correct answer: Administration

Administration is designed to achieve one of several statutory objectives, the primary one being to rescue the company as a going concern. When a company enters administration, a statutory moratorium is put in place, which prevents creditors from taking legal action against the company without the court's or the administrator's consent. This provides the 'breathing space' needed to attempt a rescue or restructuring. Liquidation is a terminal process, and a CVA, while it restructures debt, does not offer the same comprehensive moratorium from the outset.

Question 230: Which of the following is NOT a requirement for the defence of duress by threats under English criminal law?

The defendant must have had no reasonable opportunity to escape the threat
The threat must be of death or serious injury
The threat must be directed at the defendant or a close family member or someone for whom the defendant feels responsible
The defendant must have reported the threat to the police within 24 hours (Correct answer)

Correct answer: The defendant must have reported the threat to the police within 24 hours

There is no requirement to report to police within 24 hours. The requirements for duress are: a threat of death or serious physical injury, directed at the defendant or close associates, with no reasonable opportunity to escape, and the defendant's response must be that of a reasonably steadfast person.

Question 231: What is the main difference between freehold and leasehold ownership of land in England and Wales?

Freehold cannot be mortgaged; leasehold can
Leasehold is more valuable than freehold in all circumstances
Freehold is temporary; leasehold is permanent
Freehold ownership is permanent and absolute; leasehold gives a right to occupy for a fixed term subject to conditions (Correct answer)

Correct answer: Freehold ownership is permanent and absolute; leasehold gives a right to occupy for a fixed term subject to conditions

Freehold (fee simple absolute in possession) is the most complete form of land ownership — it is permanent and perpetual. Leasehold gives a right to occupy land for a defined term, subject to covenants, and ultimately reverts to the landlord.

SQE1 — Solicitors Qualifying Examination Part 1

SQE1 tests Functioning Legal Knowledge (FLK) across 12 areas of English and Welsh law via single-best-answer MCQs, and is required to qualify as a solicitor in England and Wales under the Solicitors Regulation Authority framework.

360

Questions

612 min

Time Limit

60%

To Pass

Checking for saved progress...

Exam Rules

You can skip questions and return to them later
Flag questions for review before submitting
No feedback shown until you submit the entire exam
Unanswered questions count as wrong — answer everything
10 pretest questions are mixed in and don't affect your score
Timer auto-submits when time runs out
Your progress is auto-saved every 30 seconds