โ† All PSD Flashcard Decks

Legal and Ethical Standards Flashcards

6 cards from real PSD practice questions. Tap to flip, then mark Knew It or Still Learning โ€” missed cards come back until you master them.

Read the first 6 Legal and Ethical Standards flashcards as text
  1. A dispatcher takes a call from a known local journalist asking for details about a multi-car pileup, including the conditions and names of those involved. The dispatcher knows that some medical information was relayed over the radio. According to HIPAA and general confidentiality principles, which action is most appropriate?

    Answer: State that the incident is under investigation and refer the journalist to the agency's Public Information Officer (PIO).

    The correct procedure is to refer all media inquiries to the designated Public Information Officer (PIO). Dispatchers are not authorized to release information. This ensures that the information released is accurate, appropriate, and consistent with agency policy and legal constraints like HIPAA, which protects patient health information.

  2. Which of the following scenarios best illustrates a potential violation of a public safety dispatcher's duty to act?

    Answer: A dispatcher fails to send any units to a verified address for a person reporting chest pains because the caller sounded intoxicated.

    The 'duty to act' is a legal concept that requires a dispatcher to take action and provide service once a call for help is received. Basing the decision to not dispatch on a subjective judgment (like perceived intoxication) is a breach of that duty and can lead to severe liability. All requests for emergency medical service must be taken seriously and handled according to protocol.

  3. A public safety dispatcher is off-duty and sees a social media post from a friend containing a photo of a computer screen from a neighboring dispatch center, showing call details. What is the most ethical first step for the dispatcher to take?

    Answer: Immediately report the incident to a supervisor at their own agency or the neighboring agency.

    Professional codes of conduct, such as those from APCO and IAED, emphasize the duty to maintain the integrity of the profession. Seeing a breach of confidentiality, even from another agency, warrants reporting it through official channels. This ensures the issue is handled properly by the appropriate authorities and addresses the security and ethical lapse, rather than just confronting the individual.

  4. Under the legal standard of 'negligence' in the context of public safety dispatch, which element refers to the direct link between the dispatcher's action or inaction and the resulting harm?

    Answer: Proximate Cause

    To prove negligence, four elements must be established: a duty to act, a breach of that duty, damages (injury or loss), and proximate cause. Proximate cause is the legal term for the direct connection or causal link between the breach of duty and the resulting damages.

  5. The primary purpose of CALEA (Commission on Accreditation for Law Enforcement Agencies) accreditation for a communications center is to:

    Answer: Demonstrate the agency's commitment to meeting professional standards of excellence.

    CALEA accreditation is a voluntary process where agencies commit to meeting a body of internationally recognized professional standards. It signifies a commitment to excellence, improved service delivery, and increased accountability, but does not dictate specific software or pay scales.

  6. A dispatcher receives a call from someone reporting their neighbor is having a loud party. While taking the information, the dispatcher recognizes the address as that of a local celebrity. Later, the dispatcher mentions the call and the celebrity's address to a family member. This action is a breach of:

    Answer: The public trust and confidentiality standards.

    All information obtained in the course of duty is confidential and should not be shared outside of official purposes. Sharing details of any call, regardless of its priority or the fame of the person involved, for personal conversation or gossip is a serious ethical violation that breaches the public's trust and violates confidentiality rules.