Ethical and Legal Practice 2 Flashcards

A dental assistant notices unexplained bruising on the arms and torso of a 7-year-old patient during a routine examination. The child becomes visibly anxious when asked how the injuries occurred and the parent's explanation seems inconsistent with the injuries observed. What is the dental assistant's legal obligation under Canadian provincial legislation?

Answer: Report the suspicion directly to the appropriate child protection authority without requiring the dentist's approval

Under mandatory reporting legislation in every Canadian province and territory, all regulated health professionals — including dental assistants — have an independent legal duty to report a reasonable suspicion of child abuse or neglect directly to child protective services. This duty cannot be delegated to the dentist or office manager, and the reporter is not required to have proof — only a reasonable suspicion.

A long-time patient requests a complete copy of their dental records to transfer to a new dental provider. The dentist instructs the dental assistant not to release the records until an outstanding balance of $200 is paid in full. Under Canadian privacy legislation (PIPEDA and provincial equivalents), what is the correct course of action?

Answer: Provide the patient access to their personal health information, as outstanding fees cannot be used to withhold access to one's own records

Under PIPEDA and equivalent provincial health privacy legislation, patients have a right to access their own personal health information. Dental offices may charge a reasonable fee for copying records but cannot withhold access as leverage to collect an outstanding debt. The clinical record is a legal document containing the patient's personal information, and access to it is a protected right.

During a new patient consultation, the dentist proposes a comprehensive treatment plan involving multiple extractions and immediate dentures. The patient, who speaks limited English, nods along but appears confused. The dental assistant witnesses the dentist obtain a signature on the consent form without using an interpreter or translated materials. Which ethical principle is most clearly at risk in this situation?

Answer: Autonomy, because the patient cannot make a truly informed decision without understanding the information presented

Valid informed consent requires that the patient understands the nature of the proposed treatment, risks, alternatives, and potential outcomes. Without comprehension — which cannot be ensured without appropriate language support — consent is not truly informed. This directly undermines patient autonomy, which is the ethical principle that a patient has the right to make voluntary and informed decisions about their own care.

A dental assistant notices that a respected senior colleague frequently leaves the sterilization area before the full autoclave cycle is complete and marks instruments as sterile without verifying the cycle indicators. The dental assistant feels uncomfortable confronting the colleague directly. What is the most appropriate action?

Answer: Report the concern through the office's incident reporting process or to the supervising dentist or office manager

Dental assistants have a professional and ethical obligation to patient safety. When a practice that poses a risk of patient harm is observed, the appropriate response is to report it through established channels — such as an incident report, the supervising dentist, or the office manager — rather than ignoring it, confronting the colleague without support, or involving patients directly. This upholds both non-maleficence and professional accountability.

Following a complicated extraction in which the patient experienced a dry socket, the dentist asks the dental assistant to add a note to the chart backdated to the day of the procedure, stating that post-operative instructions were verbally reviewed and a printed sheet was provided. The dental assistant is not certain whether this actually occurred. What should the dental assistant do?

Answer: Decline to add the note, as entering information that may be inaccurate constitutes falsification of a legal document

Dental records are legal documents, and entering false or unverified information — including backdating entries or documenting events the writer did not witness — constitutes falsification of records. This exposes the dental assistant to professional discipline and potential civil or criminal liability. The dental assistant's obligation to accuracy and integrity in documentation must take precedence over a dentist's instruction when that instruction would require dishonesty.

A dental assistant who is active on social media posts a photo taken in the dental operatory after the office has closed for the day. The image is intended to showcase new dental equipment. In the background, a patient's name is visible on a wall-mounted appointment board. The dental assistant does not tag the patient or mention them in the caption. Which of the following statements is correct?

Answer: A privacy breach has occurred because a patient's name is personal health information and its incidental disclosure in a public post is still a reportable breach

Under PIPEDA and provincial health privacy legislation, a patient's name linked to a dental office visit constitutes personal health information. Even incidental disclosure — such as a name appearing in the background of a social media photo — is a privacy breach if it could allow an identifiable individual to be associated with a health care setting. Intent is not required for a breach to occur; unauthorized disclosure is the determining factor.