Logical Reasoning: Paradox and Explain Questions Flashcards
7 cards from real LSAT practice questions. Tap to flip, then mark Knew It or Still Learning — missed cards come back until you master them.
Read the first 7 Logical Reasoning: Paradox and Explain Questions flashcards as text
A national park imposed a strict no-fishing rule to protect fish populations. After five years, the fish population was lower than before the ban. Which of the following most helps explain this paradox?
Answer: With fishing prohibited, no one removed invasive predatory species that had previously been caught as bycatch, allowing them to flourish and decimate native fish.
Fishing had inadvertently controlled invasive predators; removing that check allowed predators to multiply and reduce native fish populations below pre-ban levels.
A car manufacturer installed fuel-efficiency software in its vehicles and advertised lower fuel costs to consumers. However, total fuel consumption by owners of those vehicles increased. Which of the following best explains this outcome?
Answer: Drivers, perceiving their fuel costs as lower per mile, drove significantly more miles than before, consuming more total fuel.
The rebound effect explains the paradox: lower cost-per-mile incentivizes more miles driven, negating and reversing the efficiency gains in total consumption.
A school district adopted a new math curriculum designed by experts to be more rigorous, expecting test scores to improve. Scores declined significantly in the first two years. Which of the following most helps explain this?
Answer: Teachers were unfamiliar with the new material and had not yet received adequate professional development to teach it effectively.
Teachers' unfamiliarity with new curriculum typically causes a short-term performance dip before improvements emerge as they gain mastery of the material.
A city required restaurants to post calorie counts on their menus to help residents make healthier choices. Surveys taken after the policy showed that average calorie consumption per restaurant meal increased. Which of the following most helps explain this finding?
Answer: Health-conscious residents began eating at home more often, leaving only less health-conscious diners in restaurants.
If health-conscious diners shift to cooking at home after seeing menu calorie data, remaining restaurant diners skew toward those less motivated by calorie counts, raising the average.
A pharmaceutical company fast-tracked approval of a new painkiller by demonstrating it was more effective than a placebo. Yet after widespread use, population-level chronic pain rates increased. Which of the following most helps explain this paradox?
Answer: The painkiller produced dependency, leading patients to develop drug-induced hyperalgesia—a condition where stopping the drug causes greater pain than the original condition.
Drug-induced hyperalgesia caused by opioid dependency creates more chronic pain than it resolves, explaining the population-level worsening despite individual short-term efficacy.
An airline reduced the number of seats per flight to give passengers more legroom, expecting customer satisfaction to increase. Instead, overall satisfaction scores fell. Which of the following best explains this result?
Answer: The airline raised ticket prices to compensate for reduced revenue per flight, and passengers were more sensitive to price increases than they were pleased by extra legroom.
Higher ticket prices resulting from revenue recovery outweighed the legroom benefit in passengers' overall satisfaction calculus.
A forest service set fire to burn areas of dense underbrush every few years to prevent large wildfires. One year, they skipped the scheduled burn due to budget cuts. That same year, no large wildfire occurred, yet the following year's wildfire was the largest in 50 years. Which best explains this sequence?
Answer: The skipped burn allowed an unprecedented buildup of flammable underbrush, so when a fire eventually ignited, it found an abnormally large fuel load.
The skipped controlled burn allowed fuel to accumulate, and while conditions happened to prevent ignition that year, the excess fuel fed a massive fire the following year.