Basic Flashcards
7 cards from real LNAT practice questions. Tap to flip, then mark Knew It or Still Learning — missed cards come back until you master them.
Read the first 7 Basic flashcards as text
In an LNAT passage arguing that mandatory voting would increase civic participation, which of the following would most weaken this claim?
Answer: Compelled participation may produce uninformed or random ballots.
Forcing people to vote does not ensure meaningful participation, and uninformed balloting could undermine democratic quality rather than improve it.
A passage states: 'All contracts require consideration to be enforceable, and this agreement lacks consideration.' What is the logical structure of this argument?
Answer: Deductive reasoning applying a general rule to a specific case.
The argument moves from a universal rule (all contracts need consideration) to a conclusion about a specific case, which is deductive reasoning.
Which reading comprehension skill is most directly tested when an LNAT question asks you to identify the author's 'tone' in a passage?
Answer: Inferring the writer's attitude from word choice and emphasis.
Tone questions require inferring attitude and emotional register from language choices rather than just extracting stated facts.
The LNAT Section B essay is marked primarily on which of the following?
Answer: Quality of reasoning and ability to construct a coherent argument.
LNAT examiners prioritize analytical thinking and the ability to argue a position logically, not specialist legal knowledge.
A passage concludes that social media causes political polarization. Which type of evidence would best support this causal claim?
Answer: A longitudinal study tracking political views before and after social media adoption.
A longitudinal study tracking change over time establishes temporal precedence, which is necessary to support a causal rather than merely correlational claim.
In LNAT reading passages, a 'counterargument' serves which purpose in analytical writing?
Answer: It acknowledges opposing views and allows the author to rebut them, strengthening the argument.
Including and rebutting a counterargument demonstrates that the author has considered alternative views and that the main argument survives scrutiny.
Which of the following best describes the difference between an 'assumption' and a 'premise' in logical argumentation?
Answer: Premises are explicitly stated reasons; assumptions are unstated beliefs the argument depends on.
Premises are the stated building blocks of an argument, while assumptions are the hidden beliefs that must be true for the argument to hold.