I've been seeing a lot of confusion about passing scores for the SMSTS exam, so I wanted to share what I've researched and experienced.
The official minimum is typically 72%, but most successful candidates average around 81% on practice tests before sitting for the real thing. The exam prep section tends to drag scores down because it's the most conceptually dense part of the exam.
I found that working through the smsts course structure & content consistently for two to three weeks gets most people into the passing zone. For deeper concept review, smsts test filled in the gaps I had. The key isn't just doing more questions — it's reviewing every mistake and understanding the underlying principle.
Anyone who scored above 88%: what was your actual study timeline? Curious whether people who take more time consistently score higher or if there's a plateau effect.
Late to this thread but wanted to add — the practice test section trips up more people than any other part. If you're scoring below 75% there in practice, treat it as your only focus for at least a week before moving on. Breadth at the expense of depth in that area is a common mistake.
This is exactly the thread I needed. I sit for my SMSTS in 4 weeks and have been second-guessing my prep. The practice test area you mentioned is definitely my weak spot. Thanks for the honest breakdown.
The part about reviewing wrong answers thoroughly is so underrated. Most people just move on after getting something wrong. Going back to understand the concept is what actually builds retention for the SMSTS.
Honestly I almost didn't bother sitting it. I'd done a handful of practice tests and kept landing in the low 70s, right around that 72% line, and every time I thought one more bad day and I'm done. It messed with my head more than the actual material did. But I kept grinding the mock questions, mostly the ones on legislation and risk assessments because that's where I bled the most marks.
What turned it around for me was treating the practice scores as a warning system, not a verdict. Once I was consistently hitting low 80s on the mocks I stopped panicking. The real thing felt calmer than any practice run, weirdly. So if you're sat there in the 70s thinking you're not cut out for it, you probably are. Don't read too much into one bad score. Just keep showing up to the questions and let the average climb.
Yeah I failed my first go, got something like 68% and honestly I walked in way too confident. My problem wasn't the knowledge, it was that I didn't practice the timing or the wording of the questions. The real exam phrases things differently than you expect and I kept second guessing myself on the multiple choice bits.
Second time around I changed how I prepped completely. I stopped just reading the notes over and over and started doing full timed practice tests until I was hitting low 80s consistently, then I'd go back and actually understand why I got things wrong instead of just memorising the right answer. The risk assessment section is where I lost most of my marks first time, so I drilled that hard. Passed comfortably on attempt two. If you're scraping 72 on your practice runs you're cutting it too fine, give yourself a buffer.
Related Discussions
- SAC online vs in-person exam — any difference in difficulty?6 replies
- Struggling with SMSTS exam on SMSTS practice tests — any tips?6 replies
- Anyone else studying for ESC in the next month? Want to study together6 replies
- Best free resources for RSO prep — what's actually worth your time6 replies
- F89 exam day — what do you actually need to bring?6 replies