Patient Safety Guidelines Flashcards
6 cards from real DHA practice questions. Tap to flip, then mark Knew It or Still Learning — missed cards come back until you master them.
Read the first 6 Patient Safety Guidelines flashcards as text
A nurse is preparing to administer a high-alert medication via IV infusion. The pharmacy has sent two bags labeled identically except for concentration. The nurse verifies the order, which specifies the lower concentration. Before hanging the correct bag, what is the MOST critical additional safety step specific to high-alert medications in a DHA-compliant facility?
Answer: Obtain an independent double-check from a second licensed nurse before administration
DHA patient safety standards require an independent double-check (IDC) by a second licensed practitioner for high-alert medications such as concentrated electrolytes, anticoagulants, and insulin. This is distinct from a routine verification — the second nurse must independently check the drug, dose, concentration, route, and pump settings without being influenced by the first nurse's findings. Documentation, physician notification, and disposal are relevant steps but do not replace the mandatory IDC.
During a root cause analysis (RCA) following a sentinel event, the team identifies that a near-miss involving a wrong-patient blood transfusion was reported three months earlier but no corrective action was taken. Under the DHA Patient Safety framework, which failure category BEST describes this systemic gap?
Answer: Latent failure in the organization's learning and improvement system
Latent failures are systemic, organizational-level weaknesses — such as failure to act on near-miss reports — that lie dormant until they combine with other factors to cause harm. The prior near-miss report was a signal the system failed to convert into corrective action, which is a classic latent organizational failure. Active failures are immediate unsafe acts by frontline staff. SBAR and equipment issues may be contributing factors but do not describe the primary systemic gap of ignoring prior safety intelligence.
A DHA-accredited hospital implements a 'time-out' procedure before surgical procedures. A scrub technician notices that the surgeon begins the incision 45 seconds before the formal time-out is completed because the patient's vitals are deteriorating. Which principle of the DHA Surgical Safety Checklist should guide the team's response in this scenario?
Answer: Any team member has the authority and obligation to speak up and pause the procedure until the time-out is complete
DHA Surgical Safety Checklist protocols — aligned with WHO guidelines — explicitly empower any team member, regardless of hierarchy, to raise a concern and halt a procedure if a safety step is skipped. This is a cornerstone of a high-reliability culture and psychological safety. While clinical urgency can modify certain steps, a deteriorating patient who still requires an elective incision site check does not override the time-out; emergent cases have a separate protocol. Documenting and proceeding without speaking up enables a culture of hierarchy over safety.
A patient on a medical-surgical ward has a LASA (Look-Alike Sound-Alike) drug pair order: hydroxyzine 25 mg PO for anxiety. The pharmacy dispenses hydralazine 25 mg in error. The nurse administers it before realizing the mistake. The patient's blood pressure drops to 85/50 mmHg. After stabilizing the patient, which sequence of actions is MOST aligned with DHA mandatory incident reporting requirements?
Answer: Report the adverse drug event to the DHA Patient Safety department as a Serious Reportable Event within 24 hours, and complete an internal incident report simultaneously
Under DHA regulations, a medication error that results in measurable patient harm (hemodynamic compromise) constitutes a Serious Reportable Event (SRE) that must be reported to the DHA Patient Safety department within 24 hours, not left to departmental discretion. Internal reporting occurs simultaneously, not sequentially. LASA errors causing harm are never classified as near-misses — a near-miss is an event that did NOT reach the patient. Family notification follows institutional disclosure protocols but is not the first mandatory action in the reporting chain.
In the context of DHA fall prevention guidelines, a patient is assessed as HIGH risk using the Morse Fall Scale (score 65). The patient refuses bed rail use and ambulation assistance, invoking their right to autonomy. What is the MOST appropriate nursing response under DHA's balanced framework of patient rights and safety obligations?
Answer: Document the patient's refusal, implement alternative risk-reduction strategies, reassess frequently, and escalate to the physician and risk management
DHA standards recognize patient autonomy as a fundamental right while simultaneously obligating healthcare providers to ensure safety through alternative means. When a patient refuses specific interventions, the clinician must: document the informed refusal clearly, offer and implement alternative strategies (e.g., non-skid footwear, frequent toileting schedule, call bell within reach, low bed position, bed alarm), increase monitoring frequency, notify the physician, and involve risk management. Full bilateral bed rails without consent can constitute a form of physical restraint. Removing all precautions or coercive confinement both violate DHA standards.
A hospital's pressure injury prevention committee reviews data showing a 22% increase in hospital-acquired pressure injuries (HAPIs) in the ICU over 6 months despite compliance with 2-hourly repositioning. An advanced analysis reveals the majority occur at the sacrum in patients on vasopressors. Which intervention, supported by current DHA-aligned evidence-based guidelines, specifically addresses this refractory mechanism of injury?
Answer: Apply prophylactic multilayer foam dressings to the sacrum combined with microclimate management and individualized offloading devices
Vasopressor use causes peripheral vasoconstriction, dramatically reducing tissue perfusion and creating a refractory pressure injury risk even with standard repositioning. Current evidence (EPUAP/NPIAP/PPPIA guidelines, endorsed by DHA) supports prophylactic multilayer silicone foam dressings at the sacrum as they reduce shear, friction, and microclimate disruption — mechanisms that repositioning alone cannot address. Microclimate management (temperature and moisture control) and individualized offloading (e.g., heel float devices) target the specific physiology of vasopressor-induced tissue vulnerability. Repositioning every 30 minutes is clinically impractical and may increase shear injury. Alternating-pressure mattresses are an adjunct, not a replacement for localized prophylactic dressings. Restricting vasopressors is a medical decision outside nursing scope for this purpose.