Delaware Bar Examination — Questions and Answers
Question 1: Which Delaware court has jurisdiction over civil landlord-tenant summary possession proceedings?
- The Superior Court
- The Justice of the Peace Court (Correct answer)
- The Court of Chancery
- The Family Court
Correct answer: The Justice of the Peace Court
The Justice of the Peace Court has exclusive jurisdiction over summary possession actions between landlords and tenants.
Question 2: A defendant wants to bring into the case a non-party who may be liable to the defendant for all or part of the plaintiff's claim. Which device applies in Delaware Superior Court?
- Interpleader under Rule 22
- Compulsory joinder under Rule 19
- Class certification under Rule 23
- Third-party practice (impleader) under Rule 14 (Correct answer)
Correct answer: Third-party practice (impleader) under Rule 14
Rule 14 impleader allows a defending party to serve a complaint on a non-party who is or may be liable for all or part of the claim against it.
Question 3: Under the Delaware General Corporation Law, which officer is required in every Delaware corporation?
- General Counsel
- Chief Executive Officer
- Secretary (Correct answer)
- Chief Financial Officer
Correct answer: Secretary
DGCL § 142 requires every Delaware corporation to have a secretary responsible for maintaining corporate records and certifying actions.
Question 4: Under the MFW framework, what dual procedural requirements can shift entire fairness review to the business judgment rule in a controller squeeze-out?
- Special committee approval and majority-of-the-minority shareholder vote (Correct answer)
- Judicial pre-approval and full disclosure
- Board approval and supermajority shareholder vote
- Fairness opinion and unanimous board vote
Correct answer: Special committee approval and majority-of-the-minority shareholder vote
Under Kahn v. M&F Worldwide, a controlling shareholder transaction conditioned from the outset on both a fully empowered special committee and a majority-of-the-minority vote may be reviewed under the business judgment rule.
Question 5: Which Delaware constitutional provision mirrors the federal privilege against self-incrimination?
- Article I, § 6 (Correct answer)
- Article II, § 3
- Article IV, § 1
- Article I, § 7
Correct answer: Article I, § 6
Article I, § 6 of the Delaware Constitution provides that no person shall be compelled to give evidence against himself in a criminal proceeding.
Question 6: What is assumption of risk as a defense to negligence?
- Insurance companies assume all risk in negligence claims
- The defendant assumed the risk of being sued
- The court assumes risk allocation between parties
- The plaintiff knowingly and voluntarily encountered a known risk, potentially barring recovery (Correct answer)
Correct answer: The plaintiff knowingly and voluntarily encountered a known risk, potentially barring recovery
Assumption of risk applies when the plaintiff was aware of a specific danger and voluntarily chose to encounter it, which may reduce or eliminate the defendant's liability.
Question 7: Under the MFW framework, a controller merger can regain business judgment review only if it is conditioned from the outset on:
- Approval by an independent special committee AND a majority-of-the-minority stockholder vote (Correct answer)
- A fairness opinion from an investment bank
- Approval by the full board alone
- Approval by the Delaware Secretary of State
Correct answer: Approval by an independent special committee AND a majority-of-the-minority stockholder vote
Kahn v. M&F Worldwide requires both an empowered independent committee and an informed, uncoerced majority-of-the-minority vote from the start.
Question 8: What privilege protects spousal communications?
- Confidential communications between spouses during marriage are privileged and cannot be compelled (Correct answer)
- Only written communications between spouses are protected
- Spousal privilege only applies in divorce proceedings
- All conversations between married people are privileged forever
Correct answer: Confidential communications between spouses during marriage are privileged and cannot be compelled
The marital communications privilege protects confidential communications made between spouses during the marriage. The privilege generally survives divorce for communications made during the marriage.
Question 9: A state statute bars corporations from spending general treasury funds on independent political advertisements for candidates. Under current doctrine, the ban is:
- Constitutional, because corporations lack First Amendment rights
- Unconstitutional, because independent expenditures by corporations are protected political speech (Correct answer)
- Constitutional, to prevent distortion of elections
- Unconstitutional only for media corporations
Correct answer: Unconstitutional, because independent expenditures by corporations are protected political speech
Citizens United held that the government may not ban independent political expenditures by corporations, which are protected speech.
Question 10: Renvoi in conflict of laws refers to the practice of:
- Applying a foreign state's entire law, including its conflict of laws rules, rather than only its internal domestic rules (Correct answer)
- Recognizing a foreign country's money judgment
- Invoking the public policy exception to reject foreign law
- Selecting the most favorable law for the plaintiff
Correct answer: Applying a foreign state's entire law, including its conflict of laws rules, rather than only its internal domestic rules
Renvoi occurs when a court directed to apply foreign law considers whether to apply that state's entire legal system (including its choice of law rules) or just its internal substantive rules.
Question 11: In Delaware, a stockholder demanding to inspect corporate books and records under DGCL Section 220 must state what?
- Ownership of at least 5% of outstanding shares
- Approval from the board of directors
- A pending lawsuit against the corporation
- A proper purpose reasonably related to their interest as a stockholder (Correct answer)
Correct answer: A proper purpose reasonably related to their interest as a stockholder
Section 220 requires the stockholder to demonstrate a proper purpose reasonably related to their interest as a stockholder.
Question 12: Under Delaware law, what is the general statute of limitations for a breach of contract action not under seal?
- 2 years
- 3 years (Correct answer)
- 6 years
- 5 years
Correct answer: 3 years
Under 10 Del. C. § 8106, actions for breach of contract not under seal must be brought within 3 years of accrual.
Question 13: A city denies a permit for a religious group to use a public park for worship services, though it grants permits to secular groups for similar gatherings. The strongest constitutional claim is:
- Contracts Clause violation
- Substantive due process violation of the right to assemble
- Establishment Clause violation because religion is being singled out
- Free Exercise Clause violation because the policy is not neutral and generally applicable (Correct answer)
Correct answer: Free Exercise Clause violation because the policy is not neutral and generally applicable
A policy that treats religious uses worse than comparable secular uses is not neutral or generally applicable and triggers strict scrutiny under the Free Exercise Clause.
Question 14: An attorney is representing a client in a civil case and learns that the client intends to commit perjury. What should the attorney do?
- Allow the client to proceed and address the perjury only if it comes to light
- Continue representing the client and advise them on how to avoid getting caught
- Report the client's intention to the opposing party in the case
- Withdraw from the representation and inform the court about the client's intention (Correct answer)
Correct answer: Withdraw from the representation and inform the court about the client's intention
An attorney cannot knowingly assist a client in committing perjury, as it constitutes a crime and a fraud upon the court. Under the Delaware Rules of Professional Conduct, if a client insists on perjuring themselves, the attorney must first attempt to dissuade them. If unsuccessful, the attorney is obligated to withdraw from the representation and, if necessary, inform the court of the client's intent to prevent the fraud.
Question 15: A secured party sells repossessed collateral at a private sale for a price far below market value to its own affiliate. The debtor challenges the sale. What standard governs the debtor's challenge?
- Price is irrelevant so long as the secured party gave notice
- The debtor may only challenge public sales, not private sales
- Every aspect of the disposition must be commercially reasonable, and a low price invites close scrutiny of the sale's procedures (Correct answer)
- The sale is automatically void because low price alone violates Article 9
Correct answer: Every aspect of the disposition must be commercially reasonable, and a low price invites close scrutiny of the sale's procedures
Under UCC 9-610 and 9-627, a low price alone does not make a sale invalid, but it triggers careful judicial scrutiny of whether every aspect of the disposition was commercially reasonable.
Question 16: Which body publishes and codifies Delaware agency regulations?
- The Registrar of Regulations (Correct answer)
- The Delaware Court of Chancery
- The Attorney General's opinion unit
- The Secretary of State's licensing bureau
Correct answer: The Registrar of Regulations
The Registrar of Regulations publishes the monthly Register of Regulations and maintains the Delaware Administrative Code.
Question 17: Under Court of Chancery practice, what is a 'status quo order' most commonly used for?
- Freezing all assets of a defendant pending trial
- Staying discovery pending a motion to dismiss
- Preserving existing corporate governance arrangements while an expedited dispute over control is litigated (Correct answer)
- Preventing a party from filing additional lawsuits
Correct answer: Preserving existing corporate governance arrangements while an expedited dispute over control is litigated
Status quo orders in Chancery typically maintain the existing board and management structure during expedited corporate control disputes.
Question 18: Under the traditional First Restatement approach (lex loci delicti), which law governs a tort claim?
- Law of the state with the most significant relationship
- Law of the state where the defendant is domiciled
- Law of the forum state
- Law of the state where the injury occurred (Correct answer)
Correct answer: Law of the state where the injury occurred
Under the First Restatement's lex loci delicti rule, tort claims are governed by the law of the place where the injury occurred.
Question 19: Under the Delaware Rules of Criminal Procedure, a defendant must file a motion to suppress evidence how many days before trial?
- 20 days (Correct answer)
- 7 days
- 30 days
- 10 days
Correct answer: 20 days
Delaware Superior Court Criminal Rule 12 requires pretrial motions, including suppression motions, to be filed at least 20 days before trial unless the court grants leave.
Question 20: A will beneficiary who is the testator's sibling predeceases the testator, leaving two children. Under Delaware's anti-lapse statute, who takes the gift?
- The sibling's two children by representation (Correct answer)
- The sibling's estate
- The gift lapses into the residue
- The testator's heirs at law
Correct answer: The sibling's two children by representation
Delaware's anti-lapse statute preserves gifts to predeceasing relatives by passing them to the beneficiary's surviving issue by representation.
Question 21: A public high school principal deletes articles on teen pregnancy from a school-sponsored student newspaper produced in a journalism class. The deletion is:
- Impermissible unless the articles would cause substantial disruption
- Permissible only with parental consent
- Permissible if reasonably related to legitimate pedagogical concerns (Correct answer)
- Impermissible because students retain full First Amendment rights
Correct answer: Permissible if reasonably related to legitimate pedagogical concerns
Under Hazelwood, educators may control school-sponsored expression when actions are reasonably related to legitimate pedagogical concerns.
Question 22: An employer is sued for an employee's tort committed while making a personal stop far outside the delivery route. The employer's best argument is:
- The employee was on a frolic, outside the scope of employment (Correct answer)
- Respondeat superior never covers driving
- The tort was merely negligent, not intentional
- The employee was an independent contractor
Correct answer: The employee was on a frolic, outside the scope of employment
A frolic is a major deviation from employment duties that takes the employee outside the scope of employment, defeating respondeat superior.
Question 23: In Delaware partnership law, which type of partner bears unlimited personal liability for partnership debts?
- General partner (Correct answer)
- Limited partner
- Silent partner
- Dormant partner
Correct answer: General partner
General partners bear unlimited personal liability for all debts and obligations of the partnership under Delaware partnership law.
Question 24: A public university expels a student for a semester without any hearing after accusing him of cheating. His strongest constitutional argument is:
- Equal protection requires strict scrutiny of academic discipline
- Procedural due process requires notice and an opportunity to be heard before deprivation of his education interest (Correct answer)
- The expulsion is a bill of attainder
- Substantive due process protects a fundamental right to education
Correct answer: Procedural due process requires notice and an opportunity to be heard before deprivation of his education interest
Continued enrollment at a public institution is a protected interest, and disciplinary deprivations require at least notice and some opportunity to respond.
Question 25: Under the Delaware General Corporation Law (DGCL), what is the default standard of judicial review for decisions made by a corporation's board of directors?
- Business judgment rule (Correct answer)
- Entire fairness
- Strict liability
- Enhanced scrutiny
Correct answer: Business judgment rule
Under the DGCL, courts apply the business judgment rule, presuming directors acted on an informed basis, in good faith, and in the honest belief the action was in the corporation's best interests.
Question 26: For conflict of laws purposes, a person's domicile is defined as:
- The state where the person is physically present with the intent to remain indefinitely (Correct answer)
- The state where the person owns real property
- The state where the person was born
- The state where the person maintains their primary employment
Correct answer: The state where the person is physically present with the intent to remain indefinitely
Domicile requires both physical presence in a place and the intent to remain there indefinitely (or without a fixed present intent to leave), distinguishing it from mere temporary residence.
Question 27: Under the UCCJEA as adopted in Delaware, a child's 'home state' for initial custody jurisdiction is generally the state where the child lived with a parent for at least how long before the proceeding?
- 6 consecutive months (Correct answer)
- 2 years
- 1 year
- 30 days
Correct answer: 6 consecutive months
Home state jurisdiction under the UCCJEA requires the child to have lived in the state with a parent or person acting as a parent for at least six consecutive months immediately before the proceeding.
Question 28: Which law governs the validity and testamentary disposition of a decedent's personal property under traditional conflict of laws?
- The law of the testator's domicile at the time of death (Correct answer)
- The law of the state where the personal property is physically located
- The law of the state where probate proceedings are initiated
- The law of the state where the will was executed
Correct answer: The law of the testator's domicile at the time of death
For personal property (movables), the law of the testator's domicile at death governs the validity and effect of a will — the 'movables rule.'
Question 29: A buyer pays for goods to be delivered to a third party as a gift. The seller fails to deliver. May the third party sue the seller?
- No, because only the buyer has privity
- Yes, as an intended donee beneficiary once her rights vested (Correct answer)
- No, because she gave no consideration
- Yes, but only in tort
Correct answer: Yes, as an intended donee beneficiary once her rights vested
An intended donee beneficiary may enforce the contract directly against the promisor despite giving no consideration.
Question 30: A federal statute grants any citizen standing to sue agencies that fail to prepare environmental reports, regardless of personal harm. A plaintiff with no concrete injury sues. The suit should be:
- Allowed, because Congress may create standing by statute
- Dismissed, because Congress cannot eliminate Article III's injury-in-fact requirement (Correct answer)
- Allowed, because environmental harms are inherently shared
- Dismissed, because the claim is a nonjusticiable political question
Correct answer: Dismissed, because Congress cannot eliminate Article III's injury-in-fact requirement
Under Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife, a statutory citizen-suit provision cannot substitute for the constitutional requirement of concrete, particularized injury.
Question 31: Under the Delaware Superior Court Civil Rules, how long does a defendant generally have to serve an answer after being served with the summons and complaint?
- 60 days
- 20 days (Correct answer)
- 30 days
- 45 days
Correct answer: 20 days
Superior Court Civil Rule 12(a) generally requires a defendant to answer within 20 days after service of process.
Question 32: A testator writes 'I revoke my 2020 will' on the original will and signs it, but no witnesses attest. Under Delaware law, is the 2020 will revoked?
- No, because revocation always requires two witnesses
- Yes, but only as to the residuary clause
- Yes, if the writing on the will qualifies as a revocatory act of cancellation performed by the testator with intent to revoke (Correct answer)
- No, because a will can only be revoked by executing a new will
Correct answer: Yes, if the writing on the will qualifies as a revocatory act of cancellation performed by the testator with intent to revoke
A will may be revoked by a physical act such as cancellation performed on the will by the testator with revocatory intent, without witness attestation.
Question 33: Congress enacts a law abrogating state sovereign immunity for age discrimination suits under its Fourteenth Amendment Section 5 power. The abrogation is valid only if:
- The remedy is congruent and proportional to a documented pattern of constitutional violations (Correct answer)
- Congress clearly states its intent, which alone suffices
- The law regulates commerce among the states
- The states consented through ratification of the Fourteenth Amendment as to any subject
Correct answer: The remedy is congruent and proportional to a documented pattern of constitutional violations
Under City of Boerne and Kimel, Section 5 legislation abrogating immunity must be congruent and proportional to actual constitutional violations, and age classifications get only rational basis review.
Question 34: A plaintiff sues a Delaware corporation in Superior Court. The corporation believes the dispute is governed by a fiduciary duty claim requiring equitable relief. What is the proper procedural mechanism?
- Move to transfer the case to the Court of Chancery under 10 Del. C. § 1902 (Correct answer)
- Remove the case to federal district court
- File an interlocutory appeal to the Delaware Supreme Court
- File a motion to dismiss for improper venue
Correct answer: Move to transfer the case to the Court of Chancery under 10 Del. C. § 1902
Section 1902 of Title 10 allows transfer of an action filed in a court lacking jurisdiction to the appropriate Delaware court rather than dismissal.
Question 35: The constitutional standard for personal jurisdiction over a nonresident defendant, established in International Shoe Co. v. Washington (1945), requires:
- Defendant's domicile in the forum state
- Federal court authorization before a state may assert jurisdiction
- Minimum contacts with the forum state such that jurisdiction does not offend traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice (Correct answer)
- Physical presence of the defendant in the forum state at the time of service
Correct answer: Minimum contacts with the forum state such that jurisdiction does not offend traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice
International Shoe established that due process requires minimum contacts between the defendant and the forum state so that requiring defense there does not offend traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice.
Question 36: Which mechanism allows the Delaware Supreme Court to answer questions of Delaware law certified to it by federal courts and certain other tribunals?
- Interlocutory appeal under Supreme Court Rule 42
- Transfer under 10 Del. C. § 1902
- Certification of questions of law under Article IV, Section 11(8) of the Delaware Constitution and Supreme Court Rule 41 (Correct answer)
- A writ of mandamus
Correct answer: Certification of questions of law under Article IV, Section 11(8) of the Delaware Constitution and Supreme Court Rule 41
The Delaware Constitution and Supreme Court Rule 41 permit the court to accept certified questions of law from federal courts, the SEC, and other specified tribunals.
Question 37: How does Delaware's intestacy statute treat the decedent's real estate passing to a surviving spouse when the decedent leaves issue?
- The spouse takes a life estate in the intestate real estate (Correct answer)
- The real estate passes entirely to the issue
- The spouse takes the real estate in fee simple
- The spouse and issue take as joint tenants
Correct answer: The spouse takes a life estate in the intestate real estate
Delaware's intestacy scheme distinctively gives the surviving spouse a life estate in the decedent's intestate real property when there are surviving issue, with the remainder to the issue.
Question 38: The President, without congressional authorization, orders the seizure of private steel mills during a labor strike to support a war effort. Under Justice Jackson's Youngstown framework, the President's power is:
- At its maximum because of the Commander-in-Chief power
- Plenary because the action involves foreign affairs
- In the zone of twilight regardless of congressional action
- At its lowest ebb if Congress has implicitly or explicitly disapproved such seizures (Correct answer)
Correct answer: At its lowest ebb if Congress has implicitly or explicitly disapproved such seizures
When the President acts contrary to the express or implied will of Congress, his power is at its lowest ebb and the seizure fails, as in Youngstown.
Question 39: A newspaper publishes truthful information about a confidential judicial disciplinary proceeding, obtained lawfully. The state prosecutes the paper. The prosecution is:
- Constitutional because the proceeding was confidential by law
- Constitutional because the information concerned the judiciary
- Unconstitutional absent a state interest of the highest order (Correct answer)
- Unconstitutional only if the paper is a traditional media outlet
Correct answer: Unconstitutional absent a state interest of the highest order
Under Smith v. Daily Mail, the state may not punish publication of lawfully obtained truthful information about a matter of public significance absent a need of the highest order.
Question 40: A buyer reasonably believes the seller will not perform and demands adequate assurance in writing. The seller ignores the demand for 45 days. What may the buyer do under the UCC?
- Compel assurances through specific performance
- Nothing until the delivery date passes
- Recover punitive damages for the silence
- Treat the contract as repudiated after a commercially reasonable time not exceeding 30 days without assurances (Correct answer)
Correct answer: Treat the contract as repudiated after a commercially reasonable time not exceeding 30 days without assurances
Under UCC 2-609, failure to provide adequate assurance within a reasonable time, capped at 30 days, is a repudiation.
Question 41: A defendant in a Delaware Superior Court action wants to assert a claim against a co-defendant arising out of the same transaction. Which pleading is appropriate?
- A counterclaim under Rule 13(a)
- A third-party complaint under Rule 14
- A cross-claim under Rule 13(g) (Correct answer)
- An intervention motion under Rule 24
Correct answer: A cross-claim under Rule 13(g)
Rule 13(g) governs cross-claims, which are claims by one party against a co-party arising from the same transaction or occurrence.
Question 42: A borrower grants a security interest in a certificated stock certificate. The lender takes delivery of the certificate with a signed stock power. A competing creditor perfected earlier by filing. Who has priority in the certificated security?
- Neither; they share pro rata
- The lender with control/delivery, because perfection by control of investment property beats perfection by filing regardless of timing (Correct answer)
- The filing creditor, under the first-to-file rule
- The filing creditor, unless it consented to the delivery
Correct answer: The lender with control/delivery, because perfection by control of investment property beats perfection by filing regardless of timing
Under UCC 9-328, a security interest in investment property perfected by control has priority over one perfected by any other method, regardless of the order of perfection.
Question 43: A lawyer receives an email from opposing counsel that was clearly sent by mistake and contains privileged strategy. Under Rule 4.4(b), the lawyer must:
- Delete it and never mention the incident
- Forward it to the client for review
- Read it thoroughly and use it at trial
- Promptly notify the sender that the document was inadvertently sent (Correct answer)
Correct answer: Promptly notify the sender that the document was inadvertently sent
Rule 4.4(b) requires a lawyer who knows a document was inadvertently sent to promptly notify the sender.
Question 44: A buyer signs a contract to purchase a home, and the house burns down before closing through no one's fault. Under the majority doctrine of equitable conversion, who bears the loss?
- The seller, because he holds legal title until closing
- The buyer, because equitable title passed at contract signing (Correct answer)
- Neither, because the contract is automatically rescinded
- The parties share the loss equally
Correct answer: The buyer, because equitable title passed at contract signing
Under equitable conversion the buyer is treated as the equitable owner from the moment of contracting and thus bears the risk of loss in the majority view.
Question 45: A mortgagor defaults, and the lender forecloses. The property sells for less than the outstanding loan balance. What is the lender's typical remedy for the shortfall?
- Automatic title to other property of the borrower
- Nothing, because foreclosure extinguishes all debt
- A deficiency judgment against the borrower personally (Correct answer)
- Rescission of the original loan
Correct answer: A deficiency judgment against the borrower personally
When foreclosure proceeds fail to satisfy the debt, the lender may generally pursue a personal deficiency judgment against the borrower unless a statute bars it.
Question 46: A city ordinance prohibits sleeping overnight in all public parks. Protesters camping to dramatize homelessness challenge it. The ordinance is likely:
- Valid as a content-neutral time, place, and manner regulation (Correct answer)
- Invalid because camping is expressive conduct receiving strict scrutiny
- Valid only in nonpublic forums
- Invalid as a prior restraint
Correct answer: Valid as a content-neutral time, place, and manner regulation
Under Clark v. CCNV, a content-neutral ban on overnight sleeping is a reasonable time, place, and manner restriction serving park maintenance interests.
Question 47: To recover for defamation, a private-figure plaintiff suing over a statement on a matter of public concern must prove at minimum:
- Ill will toward the plaintiff
- Strict liability applies, so only falsity
- Negligence as to falsity (Correct answer)
- Actual malice
Correct answer: Negligence as to falsity
Under Gertz, private figures on matters of public concern must prove at least negligence regarding the statement's falsity.
Question 48: In a Delaware trial, an attorney asks the court to take judicial notice that Wilmington is in New Castle County. The court:
- May refuse because geography requires expert proof
- Must take judicial notice if supplied with the necessary information, since the fact is not subject to reasonable dispute (Correct answer)
- May take notice only in civil cases
- Must submit the question to the jury for an independent finding
Correct answer: Must take judicial notice if supplied with the necessary information, since the fact is not subject to reasonable dispute
Under D.R.E. 201, a court must take judicial notice of an indisputable fact generally known within the jurisdiction if a party requests it and supplies the necessary information.
Question 49: A legislature gives an agency power to regulate 'in the public interest' with no other guidance. A challenge to this grant would invoke:
- Procedural due process
- The dormant Commerce Clause
- The Contracts Clause
- The nondelegation doctrine (Correct answer)
Correct answer: The nondelegation doctrine
The nondelegation doctrine requires the legislature to supply an intelligible principle when delegating authority to agencies.
Question 50: A state taxes out-of-state milk producers at a higher rate than in-state producers to protect local dairies. Absent congressional authorization, the tax is:
- Valid because taxes are reviewed only for rational basis
- Valid under the state's police power over health
- Invalid as facial discrimination against interstate commerce (Correct answer)
- Invalid only if the burden on commerce is clearly excessive under Pike balancing
Correct answer: Invalid as facial discrimination against interstate commerce
A facially discriminatory tax that economically protects in-state interests is virtually per se invalid under the dormant Commerce Clause.
Question 51: In the Delaware Court of Chancery, who decides issues of fact at trial?
- A six-person jury
- A twelve-person jury
- A panel of three masters
- The Chancellor or a Vice Chancellor, because there are no jury trials in Chancery (Correct answer)
Correct answer: The Chancellor or a Vice Chancellor, because there are no jury trials in Chancery
The Court of Chancery is a court of equity where the Chancellor or Vice Chancellors act as fact-finders, and there is no right to a jury trial.
Question 52: In a Delaware fraud prosecution, the State offers the defendant's prior scheme involving nearly identical fake invoices to prove a common plan and intent. Under D.R.E. 404(b), this evidence is:
- Inadmissible because prior bad acts are never allowed
- Admissible for the non-propensity purposes of plan and intent, subject to Rule 403 balancing (Correct answer)
- Admissible to show the defendant is a dishonest person
- Admissible only if it resulted in a conviction
Correct answer: Admissible for the non-propensity purposes of plan and intent, subject to Rule 403 balancing
Other-acts evidence may be admitted for purposes such as plan, intent, or identity, provided its probative value is not substantially outweighed by unfair prejudice.
Question 53: In Delaware Superior Court, which statement about the doctrine of forum non conveniens is accurate?
- The doctrine applies only to cases involving foreign countries
- Plaintiff's choice of forum receives no weight in the analysis
- The court must dismiss whenever a parallel action exists in another state
- Dismissal requires the defendant to show overwhelming hardship under the Cryo-Maid factors when the Delaware action is first-filed (Correct answer)
Correct answer: Dismissal requires the defendant to show overwhelming hardship under the Cryo-Maid factors when the Delaware action is first-filed
Delaware applies the Cryo-Maid factors and requires a first-filed Delaware defendant to demonstrate overwhelming hardship to obtain dismissal.
Question 54: A debtor owes $10,000 on an undisputed, liquidated debt. The creditor agrees to accept $7,000 as full payment, and the debtor pays. May the creditor later sue for the remaining $3,000?
- Yes, because part payment of a liquidated debt is not consideration for discharging the balance (Correct answer)
- No, because the creditor accepted the payment
- Yes, but only if the debtor acted in bad faith
- No, because accord and satisfaction always discharges debts
Correct answer: Yes, because part payment of a liquidated debt is not consideration for discharging the balance
Under the pre-existing duty rule, paying less than an undisputed liquidated debt provides no consideration to discharge the remainder.
Question 55: A seller contracts to convey "marketable title." A title search reveals the property violates a zoning ordinance due to an existing structure built too close to the lot line. Is title marketable?
- Yes, because the violation predates the contract
- No, because any zoning ordinance's mere existence defeats marketability
- No, because an existing zoning violation renders title unmarketable (Correct answer)
- Yes, because zoning laws never affect marketability
Correct answer: No, because an existing zoning violation renders title unmarketable
The mere existence of zoning laws does not impair marketability, but an actual existing violation exposes the buyer to litigation and makes title unmarketable.
Question 56: What is the Rule Against Perpetuities?
- A rule against multiple mortgages on one property
- A rule that limits lease terms to 99 years
- A rule preventing property from being sold more than once
- A rule requiring that future interests must vest within a life in being plus 21 years (Correct answer)
Correct answer: A rule requiring that future interests must vest within a life in being plus 21 years
The Rule Against Perpetuities invalidates future interests that might not vest within 21 years after the death of a measuring life in being at the creation of the interest.
Question 57: A state supreme court strikes down a state search statute, resting its decision on both the Fourth Amendment and an adequate, independent state constitutional ground. The U.S. Supreme Court should:
- Decline review because the state ground independently supports the judgment (Correct answer)
- Remand for clarification in all such cases
- Grant review because a federal question was decided
- Grant review and decide only the federal issue
Correct answer: Decline review because the state ground independently supports the judgment
The Supreme Court will not review a state judgment resting on an adequate and independent state ground, since reversal on the federal issue would not change the outcome.
Question 58: Under the Delaware Rules of Criminal Procedure, when must an indictment or information be filed for a felony charge?
- Before the grand jury convenes
- Prior to or at the time of arraignment (Correct answer)
- Within 10 days of preliminary hearing
- Within 30 days of arrest
Correct answer: Prior to or at the time of arraignment
An indictment or information must be filed prior to or at the time of arraignment under Delaware criminal procedure.
Question 59: A secured party with a perfected security interest in a debtor's inventory claims the cash the debtor received from selling that inventory. For how long is the security interest in the identifiable cash proceeds perfected?
- It is never perfected without a new filing covering money
- Only until the debtor deposits the cash into a bank account
- Only 20 days after receipt, in all cases
- It remains continuously perfected because the proceeds are identifiable cash proceeds (Correct answer)
Correct answer: It remains continuously perfected because the proceeds are identifiable cash proceeds
Under UCC 9-315(d)(2), a security interest in identifiable cash proceeds remains perfected beyond the 20-day period without further action.
Question 60: Under Delaware law, the statute of limitations for most personal injury actions is:
- Two years (Correct answer)
- Six years
- One year
- Three years
Correct answer: Two years
Delaware's 10 Del. C. § 8119 sets a two-year limitations period for personal injury claims.
Question 61: Under Delaware law, when a controlling stockholder stands on both sides of a merger, the default standard of review is:
- The business judgment rule
- Entire fairness, with the burden on the controller (Correct answer)
- Enhanced scrutiny under Revlon
- Rational basis review
Correct answer: Entire fairness, with the burden on the controller
Conflicted controller transactions are reviewed for entire fairness—fair dealing and fair price—unless properly conditioned under MFW.
Question 62: A seller repudiates a contract for the sale of widgets before the delivery date. Which remedy is NOT available to the buyer under the UCC?
- Cover by purchasing substitute goods and recovering the difference
- Punitive damages for the repudiation (Correct answer)
- Market-price damages measured when the buyer learned of the breach
- Specific performance if the goods are unique
Correct answer: Punitive damages for the repudiation
Punitive damages are generally unavailable for breach of contract, while cover, market damages, and specific performance for unique goods are all UCC remedies.
Question 63: A minor purchases a car, uses it for six months, and then seeks to disaffirm the contract. What is the general common law result?
- The minor must pay full fair market value for the use
- The minor is bound because the car was used
- The minor may disaffirm and recover payments, returning the car in its current condition (Correct answer)
- Disaffirmance is barred after 30 days of use
Correct answer: The minor may disaffirm and recover payments, returning the car in its current condition
A minor may disaffirm a contract for non-necessaries and generally need only return the goods in whatever condition they remain.
Question 64: A defendant shoots at A, misses, and hits B, who was standing nearby. B sues for battery. The doctrine allowing B to recover is:
- Vicarious liability
- Negligence per se
- Transferred intent (Correct answer)
- Respondeat superior
Correct answer: Transferred intent
Transferred intent shifts the intent to harm A onto the actual victim B, completing the battery claim.
Question 65: A tenant assigns her lease to an assignee, who later stops paying rent. The lease contained no release of the original tenant. Whom may the landlord sue for the unpaid rent?
- Only the original tenant, because the landlord never approved the assignment
- Neither, because assignment voids the lease
- Only the assignee, because assignment ends the original tenant's duties
- Either the assignee (privity of estate) or the original tenant (privity of contract) (Correct answer)
Correct answer: Either the assignee (privity of estate) or the original tenant (privity of contract)
After assignment the assignee is liable through privity of estate while the original tenant remains liable on the contract absent a novation.
Question 66: When may character evidence be used to prove conduct?
- Character evidence is never admissible in any case
- Only the prosecution may introduce character evidence
- In criminal cases, the defendant may offer evidence of pertinent good character traits (Correct answer)
- Character evidence is always admissible to prove conduct
Correct answer: In criminal cases, the defendant may offer evidence of pertinent good character traits
In criminal cases, the defendant may offer evidence of relevant good character traits. The prosecution cannot initiate character evidence but may rebut once the defendant opens the door.
Question 67: A federal statute makes it a crime to burn a draft card. A protester burns his card and is convicted. The conviction is:
- Valid under O'Brien, because the law furthers an important interest unrelated to suppressing expression (Correct answer)
- Valid only if the protester intended no message
- Invalid because flag and card burning are pure speech
- Invalid because the law is content-based
Correct answer: Valid under O'Brien, because the law furthers an important interest unrelated to suppressing expression
United States v. O'Brien upheld the conviction because preserving the draft system is an important governmental interest unrelated to the suppression of speech.
Question 68: The penal law exception in conflict of laws provides that a forum state will:
- Defer to federal criminal law in all multi-state disputes
- Refuse to enforce another state's penal laws or collect another sovereign's taxes (Correct answer)
- Apply the strictest penalty available among potentially applicable laws
- Apply foreign criminal statutes in its civil courts when asked
Correct answer: Refuse to enforce another state's penal laws or collect another sovereign's taxes
The penal law exception holds that courts will not enforce the penal statutes or revenue (tax) laws of foreign states, as those reflect sovereign power peculiar to the enacting state.
Question 69: A Delaware store owner detains a suspected shoplifter for a reasonable time and in a reasonable manner based on reasonable suspicion. In a false imprisonment suit, the owner's best defense is:
- Consent
- Necessity
- The shopkeeper's privilege (Correct answer)
- Defense of property by any means
Correct answer: The shopkeeper's privilege
The shopkeeper's privilege permits reasonable detention of suspected shoplifters for investigation without liability for false imprisonment.
Question 70: Which official supervises the initial probate of wills and grants letters testamentary in each Delaware county?
- The Register of Wills (Correct answer)
- The Recorder of Deeds
- The Clerk of the Peace
- The Prothonotary
Correct answer: The Register of Wills
The Register of Wills in each Delaware county admits wills to probate and grants letters testamentary or of administration.
Question 71: A homeowner promises to pay a painter $5,000 after the painter has already finished painting the house as a volunteer. Is the promise enforceable under traditional contract law?
- No, because painting is a service, not goods
- Yes, because the promise was in writing
- No, because past consideration is not valid consideration (Correct answer)
- Yes, because the painter conferred a benefit
Correct answer: No, because past consideration is not valid consideration
Past consideration cannot support a new promise because the bargained-for exchange element is missing.
Question 72: What is relevance in evidence law?
- Evidence that the judge personally finds interesting
- Evidence that has any tendency to make a material fact more or less probable (Correct answer)
- Only direct evidence of the crime
- Evidence that proves a fact conclusively
Correct answer: Evidence that has any tendency to make a material fact more or less probable
Relevant evidence is any evidence that has a tendency to make a fact of consequence to the case more or less probable than it would be without the evidence.
Question 73: Under the Delaware Revised Uniform Limited Partnership Act, what is the liability of a limited partner for the partnership's debts?
- No liability of any kind
- Unlimited personal liability
- Liability limited to capital contribution (Correct answer)
- Liability capped at twice the capital contribution
Correct answer: Liability limited to capital contribution
A Delaware limited partner's liability for partnership obligations is generally limited to the amount of the partner's capital contribution under 6 Del. C. § 17-303.
Question 74: In Delaware, which of the following is an essential element of theft?
- The taking of property by mistake, without any criminal intent.
- The taking of property without the owner’s knowledge, regardless of intent.
- The taking of property without the owner’s knowledge, regardless of intent.
- The unlawful taking of property with the intent to permanently deprive the owner of that property. (Correct answer)
Correct answer: The unlawful taking of property with the intent to permanently deprive the owner of that property.
Theft, under Delaware law and common law principles, requires more than just taking someone's property. A crucial element is the specific intent to permanently deprive the rightful owner of their possession. Without this intent, the act might be considered a different offense, such as trespass or conversion, but not theft.
Question 75: Under Delaware law, how many witnesses must attest a will for it to be validly executed?
- Three disinterested witnesses
- Two credible witnesses (Correct answer)
- One witness plus a notary
- No witnesses if the will is entirely handwritten
Correct answer: Two credible witnesses
Delaware requires a will to be signed by the testator and attested in writing by two or more credible witnesses.
Question 76: In a Delaware stockholder derivative suit, what must a plaintiff plead under Court of Chancery Rule 23.1 if no pre-suit demand was made on the board?
- Proof of actual damages exceeding $75,000
- Certification that at least 5% of stockholders support the suit
- A general allegation that the board is conflicted
- Particularized facts showing that demand would have been futile (Correct answer)
Correct answer: Particularized facts showing that demand would have been futile
Rule 23.1 requires particularized allegations demonstrating demand futility, as elaborated in the Zuckerberg three-part test.
Question 77: A rescuer injured while reasonably attempting to save someone endangered by the defendant's negligence may recover because:
- The defendant owes duties to all persons everywhere
- Rescuers are strictly protected regardless of their own recklessness
- Danger invites rescue, making the rescuer a foreseeable plaintiff (Correct answer)
- The rescue doctrine eliminates the causation requirement
Correct answer: Danger invites rescue, making the rescuer a foreseeable plaintiff
Under the rescue doctrine, rescuers are foreseeable plaintiffs because danger invites rescue.
Question 78: A debtor grants a security interest in 'all inventory now owned or hereafter acquired.' Six months later the debtor acquires new inventory. When does the security interest attach to the new inventory?
- Never, because after-acquired property clauses are unenforceable for inventory
- When the security agreement was originally signed
- When the secured party files an amended financing statement
- When the debtor acquires rights in the new inventory (Correct answer)
Correct answer: When the debtor acquires rights in the new inventory
Under UCC 9-204, an after-acquired property clause is effective, but attachment occurs only when the debtor acquires rights in the new collateral.
Question 79: A zoning board denies a variance to a landowner, leaving the land with some economically viable use but reducing its value by 75%. Under Penn Central, the strongest analysis is:
- A taking, because any denial of a variance requires compensation
- A per se taking, because value dropped more than half
- No taking, because diminution in value alone does not establish a regulatory taking (Correct answer)
- A per se taking under Loretto
Correct answer: No taking, because diminution in value alone does not establish a regulatory taking
Penn Central weighs economic impact, investment-backed expectations, and the character of the action, and mere diminution in value—even substantial—is not itself a taking.
Question 80: What is exhaustion of administrative remedies?
- A principle that courts must hear every case before it
- A rule that agency resources must be fully used before new funding
- A doctrine preventing agencies from reopening closed cases
- A requirement that parties must pursue all available agency processes before seeking court review (Correct answer)
Correct answer: A requirement that parties must pursue all available agency processes before seeking court review
Exhaustion requires parties to complete available administrative proceedings before filing suit in court, allowing agencies to apply their expertise and potentially resolve disputes without litigation.
Question 81: A statute authorizes attorney's fees against a Delaware public body that violates FOIA. This remedy primarily serves to:
- Encourage citizen enforcement of open government laws (Correct answer)
- Fund the Register of Regulations
- Punish individual employees criminally
- Compensate the Attorney General's office
Correct answer: Encourage citizen enforcement of open government laws
Fee-shifting incentivizes citizens to enforce transparency requirements they could not otherwise afford to litigate.
Question 82: A plaintiff in Delaware Superior Court wants to voluntarily dismiss the action after the defendant has answered. Under Rule 41(a), what is required?
- Simply filing a notice of dismissal
- Leave of the Delaware Supreme Court
- A stipulation signed by all parties or a court order (Correct answer)
- Payment of the defendant's attorney fees
Correct answer: A stipulation signed by all parties or a court order
After an answer or summary judgment motion is filed, voluntary dismissal requires either a stipulation of all parties or court approval under Rule 41(a).
Question 83: A seller resells goods after the buyer wrongfully rejects them, but recovers less than the contract price. The seller is a dealer with an unlimited supply of the goods. What additional recovery may the seller seek?
- Consequential damages only
- Lost profits as a lost volume seller, because the resale did not substitute for the broken sale (Correct answer)
- The full contract price plus resale proceeds
- Nothing beyond the resale differential
Correct answer: Lost profits as a lost volume seller, because the resale did not substitute for the broken sale
A lost volume seller may recover the profit it would have made on the broken sale under UCC 2-708(2) because it could have made both sales.
Question 84: A contract for the sale of a rare painting for $400 is oral. The buyer sues to enforce it. What is the best analysis under the Statute of Frauds?
- It is enforceable because goods contracts under $500 need no writing (Correct answer)
- It is unenforceable because all art sales must be written
- It is enforceable only if the seller admits the contract in court
- It is unenforceable because unique goods require a writing
Correct answer: It is enforceable because goods contracts under $500 need no writing
UCC 2-201 requires a writing only for sales of goods priced at $500 or more, so a $400 oral sale is enforceable.
Question 85: A seller delivers defective goods with time remaining before the contractual delivery deadline. The buyer rejects. What right does the seller have?
- No right to a second tender
- A right to rescind the contract unilaterally
- A right to demand full payment despite the defect
- A right to cure by making a conforming delivery within the contract time after seasonable notice (Correct answer)
Correct answer: A right to cure by making a conforming delivery within the contract time after seasonable notice
UCC 2-508 gives a seller the right to cure a rejected non-conforming tender by delivering conforming goods within the original contract time upon seasonable notice.
Question 86: A consumer buys a refrigerator on credit from an appliance store, which retains a PMSI. The store never files a financing statement. The consumer later sells the refrigerator to a neighbor for personal use, who pays value and has no knowledge of the security interest. Who prevails?
- The neighbor, because all sales to good-faith buyers cut off security interests
- The store, because buyers can never take free of a PMSI
- The neighbor, under the garage-sale (consumer-to-consumer) exception since no financing statement was filed (Correct answer)
- The store, because a PMSI in consumer goods is automatically perfected
Correct answer: The neighbor, under the garage-sale (consumer-to-consumer) exception since no financing statement was filed
Under UCC 9-320(b), a buyer of consumer goods for personal use who pays value without knowledge takes free of an automatically perfected PMSI unless a financing statement was filed.
Question 87: A state grants a tax exemption for religious publications only, not secular ones. The exemption most likely violates:
- The Free Exercise Clause
- The Free Press Clause only
- The Establishment Clause, because it favors religious over nonreligious publications (Correct answer)
- Nothing, because tax exemptions are legislative grace
Correct answer: The Establishment Clause, because it favors religious over nonreligious publications
In Texas Monthly v. Bullock, an exemption available solely to religious publications was held to impermissibly advance religion.
Question 88: The Delaware Rapid Arbitration Act (DRAA) is best described as providing what?
- Mandatory arbitration for all consumer disputes in Delaware
- Court-annexed arbitration for personal injury cases only
- A streamlined, expedited arbitration process for business disputes with strict deadlines and limited judicial review (Correct answer)
- A small-claims mediation program in Justice of the Peace Court
Correct answer: A streamlined, expedited arbitration process for business disputes with strict deadlines and limited judicial review
The DRAA offers sophisticated business parties a fast-track arbitration with default 120-day resolution deadlines and narrow review by the Delaware Supreme Court.
Question 89: A buyer discovers a breach of warranty after accepting goods. What must the buyer do to preserve a remedy against the seller?
- Immediately return the goods for a refund
- Notify the seller of the breach within a reasonable time after discovering it (Correct answer)
- File suit within 30 days of acceptance
- Obtain an independent inspection report
Correct answer: Notify the seller of the breach within a reasonable time after discovering it
UCC 2-607 bars any remedy for an accepted tender unless the buyer notifies the seller of the breach within a reasonable time after discovery.
Question 90: What is the purpose of probate?
- To create a will after death
- To automatically transfer property to the spouse
- Only to determine estate tax liability
- To validate the will, identify assets, pay debts, and distribute the estate under court supervision (Correct answer)
Correct answer: To validate the will, identify assets, pay debts, and distribute the estate under court supervision
Probate is the court-supervised process of proving the will's validity, inventorying the estate, paying creditors and taxes, and distributing remaining assets to beneficiaries.
Question 91: A lawyer discovers that a colleague has engaged in serious misconduct, such as embezzling client funds. What is the lawyer's ethical obligation regarding this discovery?
- Discuss the misconduct with the colleague and suggest they stop but take no further action
- Report the misconduct to the appropriate disciplinary authority or bar association (Correct answer)
- Inform the affected clients directly about the misconduct without reporting to the bar association
- Ignore the misconduct unless it directly affects the lawyer’s own practice
Correct answer: Report the misconduct to the appropriate disciplinary authority or bar association
Under Rule 8.3 of the Delaware Rules of Professional Conduct, a lawyer has an ethical obligation to report serious misconduct by another lawyer to the appropriate disciplinary authority. This duty applies when the misconduct raises a substantial question about the lawyer's honesty, trustworthiness, or fitness to practice. Reporting such violations is crucial for maintaining the integrity of the legal profession and protecting the public.
Question 92: Under Delaware law, what is the statute of limitations for most Class A felonies?
- 10 years
- No limitation (Correct answer)
- 3 years
- 5 years
Correct answer: No limitation
Delaware has no statute of limitations for Class A felonies, which include the most serious crimes such as murder.
Question 93: A continuation statement is filed seven months before the financing statement's five-year term expires. What is its effect?
- It converts the filing into a permanent record
- It is effective and restarts the five-year period from its own filing date
- It extends effectiveness for five more years from the lapse date
- It is ineffective because it was filed outside the six-month window before lapse (Correct answer)
Correct answer: It is ineffective because it was filed outside the six-month window before lapse
Under UCC 9-515(d), a continuation statement may be filed only within six months before the five-year period expires, so a filing seven months early is ineffective.
Question 94: Under the DGCL, which standard applies when the board of a Delaware corporation adopts a shareholder rights plan (poison pill)?
- Per se invalid
- Business judgment rule
- Entire fairness
- Unocal enhanced scrutiny (Correct answer)
Correct answer: Unocal enhanced scrutiny
Defensive measures such as shareholder rights plans are subject to Unocal enhanced scrutiny, requiring the board to show a reasonable threat and proportionate response.
Question 95: An agency head who personally investigated and publicly prejudged a respondent's guilt then presides over the hearing. The best objection is:
- Improper venue
- Bias violating the right to an impartial decision-maker (Correct answer)
- Failure to join an indispensable party
- Lack of subject-matter jurisdiction
Correct answer: Bias violating the right to an impartial decision-maker
Due process forbids adjudication by a decision-maker who has prejudged the facts or has a disqualifying bias.
Question 96: A financing statement was filed on January 10, 2020. No continuation statement is ever filed. When does the financing statement lapse, and what is the effect on a perfected security interest against a purchaser for value?
- It lapses January 10, 2023, but perfection continues automatically
- It never lapses unless terminated
- It lapses January 10, 2030, with perfection continuing for 6 more months
- It lapses January 10, 2025, and the security interest is deemed never perfected against a purchaser for value (Correct answer)
Correct answer: It lapses January 10, 2025, and the security interest is deemed never perfected against a purchaser for value
Under UCC 9-515, a financing statement is effective for five years, and upon lapse the security interest is deemed never to have been perfected as against a purchaser for value.
Question 97: A plaintiff sues a private shopping mall for excluding her leafleting activity, claiming a First Amendment violation. The suit will most likely fail because:
- Malls are nonpublic forums where all speech may be banned
- There is no state action by a privately owned mall (Correct answer)
- Leafleting is not protected speech
- The Eleventh Amendment bars the suit
Correct answer: There is no state action by a privately owned mall
The First Amendment restrains only government conduct, and a private mall's exclusion of speakers is not state action under Hudgens v. NLRB.
Question 98: During discovery in Delaware Superior Court, a party fails to respond to interrogatories. What must the requesting party generally do before moving to compel?
- Notice the deposition of opposing counsel
- Request a default judgment
- Make a good faith effort to resolve the dispute with opposing counsel and certify that effort to the court (Correct answer)
- File an immediate motion for sanctions under Rule 11
Correct answer: Make a good faith effort to resolve the dispute with opposing counsel and certify that effort to the court
Delaware rules require counsel to confer in good faith and certify the effort before seeking court intervention on discovery disputes.
Question 99: A state law requires all public school teachers to be U.S. citizens. A lawful permanent resident denied a teaching job challenges the law. The law is most likely:
- Invalid because alienage classifications always receive strict scrutiny
- Valid only if Congress has approved it
- Invalid under the Privileges or Immunities Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment
- Valid under the public function exception to strict scrutiny for alienage classifications (Correct answer)
Correct answer: Valid under the public function exception to strict scrutiny for alienage classifications
Under Ambach v. Norwick, teaching is a governmental function tied to democratic self-governance, so citizenship requirements receive only rational basis review.
Question 100: In Delaware, a defendant moves to dismiss under Superior Court Civil Rule 12(b)(6). What standard does the court apply?
- Whether the plaintiff could recover under any reasonably conceivable set of circumstances susceptible of proof (Correct answer)
- Whether the plaintiff has proven the claim by a preponderance of the evidence
- Whether there is no genuine issue of material fact
- Whether the claim is plausible on its face under Twombly and Iqbal
Correct answer: Whether the plaintiff could recover under any reasonably conceivable set of circumstances susceptible of proof
Delaware courts apply the 'reasonable conceivability' standard, which is more lenient to plaintiffs than the federal plausibility standard.
Question 101: A state requires parade permits and gives the police chief unlimited discretion to set fees based on anticipated crowd hostility. The fee scheme is:
- Constitutional, because permit fees are administrative
- Unconstitutional, because charging based on listener reaction is content-based and discretion is unbridled (Correct answer)
- Unconstitutional only as applied to unpopular groups
- Constitutional, if fees are capped at actual security costs
Correct answer: Unconstitutional, because charging based on listener reaction is content-based and discretion is unbridled
Forsyth County v. Nationalist Movement struck down fees pegged to expected audience hostility as content-based and standardless.
Question 102: A father challenges a state's denial of unemployment benefits to his daughter, asserting her constitutional rights, though she is an adult fully able to sue. The court should:
- Dismiss for lack of third-party standing because no obstacle prevents the daughter from asserting her own rights (Correct answer)
- Hear the case under associational standing
- Dismiss because unemployment benefits are not property
- Hear the case because family members always have standing for each other
Correct answer: Dismiss for lack of third-party standing because no obstacle prevents the daughter from asserting her own rights
Third-party standing generally requires a close relationship plus a hindrance to the right-holder suing herself, and an able adult faces no such hindrance.
Question 103: A Delaware prosecutor offers a properly authenticated certificate of no record from the DMV to show the defendant was never issued a driver's license. This evidence is:
- Admissible under the hearsay exception for absence of a public record (Correct answer)
- Inadmissible as improper character evidence
- Inadmissible hearsay because no declarant testifies
- Admissible only with live testimony from the DMV custodian
Correct answer: Admissible under the hearsay exception for absence of a public record
D.R.E. 803(10) allows a certification that a diligent search failed to disclose a public record to prove the record's absence or the nonoccurrence of a matter.
Question 104: Which doctrine allows Delaware courts to admit evidence obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment when officers reasonably relied on a defective warrant?
- Plain view doctrine
- Fruit of the poisonous tree
- Inevitable discovery
- Good faith exception (Correct answer)
Correct answer: Good faith exception
Under United States v. Leon, adopted in Delaware, evidence obtained pursuant to a defective warrant is admissible if officers acted in objective good faith reliance on it.
Question 105: A case is filed in Delaware Superior Court in Kent County, but the contract at issue was signed and performed entirely in New Castle County where all parties reside. What is the defendant's proper objection?
- A Rule 12(b)(2) motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction
- Removal to the Court of Common Pleas
- None based on county alone, because Superior Court venue lies statewide and objections go to forum convenience, not jurisdiction (Correct answer)
- A motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction
Correct answer: None based on county alone, because Superior Court venue lies statewide and objections go to forum convenience, not jurisdiction
The Superior Court is a single statewide court, so filing in a different county raises at most a discretionary transfer issue, not a jurisdictional defect.
Question 106: In Delaware, which statement about summary judgment practice in the Superior Court is correct?
- Summary judgment is granted only when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law, viewing facts in the light most favorable to the non-movant (Correct answer)
- Cross-motions for summary judgment always require the court to grant one of them
- Summary judgment may be granted whenever the judge believes the movant is more likely to win at trial
- Summary judgment is unavailable in contract disputes
Correct answer: Summary judgment is granted only when there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law, viewing facts in the light most favorable to the non-movant
Rule 56 requires the absence of any genuine issue of material fact, with all reasonable inferences drawn in the non-movant's favor.
Question 107: Under the U.S. Constitution, what is the primary purpose of the separation of powers doctrine?
- To ensure that state governments have the same powers as the federal government.
- To prevent any one branch of government from gaining too much power by ensuring that legislative, executive, and judicial functions are divided among different branches. (Correct answer)
- To allow the President to have complete control over the legislative process.
- To ensure that all government branches operate under the same set of laws and regulations.
Correct answer: To prevent any one branch of government from gaining too much power by ensuring that legislative, executive, and judicial functions are divided among different branches.
The separation of powers doctrine is a fundamental principle of the U.S. Constitution designed to safeguard against tyranny and abuse of authority. By dividing governmental responsibilities into three distinct branches—legislative (Congress), executive (President), and judicial (Courts)—it creates a system of checks and balances. This division ensures that no single branch can become overly dominant, protecting individual liberties.
Question 108: Under the Erie doctrine, a federal court sitting in diversity jurisdiction must apply:
- The substantive law of the state in which the federal court sits, including that state's conflict of laws rules (Correct answer)
- The law of the state most favorable to the plaintiff
- Federal statutory law as the default on all substantive questions
- Federal common law on all substantive and procedural issues
Correct answer: The substantive law of the state in which the federal court sits, including that state's conflict of laws rules
Under Erie Railroad Co. v. Tompkins (1938), federal courts in diversity cases must apply the substantive law of the forum state, including its choice of law rules (per Klaxon Co. v. Stentor).
Question 109: Under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, what determines the proper venue for a civil case?
- The venue is based solely on the location of the plaintiff's attorney.
- The venue is determined based on where the defendant resides, where a substantial part of the events occurred, or where the property is located. (Correct answer)
- The venue is automatically determined by the location where the case was first filed.
- The venue is determined by the federal district court's convenience for the judge.
Correct answer: The venue is determined based on where the defendant resides, where a substantial part of the events occurred, or where the property is located.
Proper venue in federal civil cases refers to the appropriate geographic location for a lawsuit, distinct from subject matter or personal jurisdiction. Federal statutes, primarily 28 U.S.C. § 1391, dictate that venue is proper in a judicial district where any defendant resides, where a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claim occurred, or where the property subject to the action is located. This ensures the case is heard in a reasonably convenient and relevant forum.
Question 110: In a strict products liability action, which defect theory alleges the product was made exactly as designed but the design itself is unreasonably dangerous?
- Failure to warn
- Design defect (Correct answer)
- Breach of express warranty
- Manufacturing defect
Correct answer: Design defect
A design defect claim challenges the inherent design, typically under a risk-utility or consumer expectation test.
Question 111: In a Delaware civil trial, a party seeks to impeach a witness with a felony conviction that is 12 years old, measured from release. The conviction is admissible only if:
- Its probative value substantially outweighs its prejudicial effect and reasonable written notice is given (Correct answer)
- The witness is a party to the case
- The conviction involved violence
- The judge finds the witness is lying
Correct answer: Its probative value substantially outweighs its prejudicial effect and reasonable written notice is given
Under D.R.E. 609(b), convictions more than 10 years old require that probative value substantially outweigh prejudice plus reasonable written notice to the adverse party.
Question 112: Delaware permits a 'silent trust,' which is best described as a trust that does what?
- Pays no distributions during the settlor's life
- Has no named trustee
- Cannot be construed by any court
- Restricts or delays the trustee's duty to inform beneficiaries of the trust's existence or terms for a period (Correct answer)
Correct answer: Restricts or delays the trustee's duty to inform beneficiaries of the trust's existence or terms for a period
Delaware allows the governing instrument to limit the trustee's duty to inform beneficiaries for a designated period, such as until a beneficiary reaches a certain age.
Question 113: A lawyer wants to negotiate a book deal with a client about the client's pending criminal case before the representation ends. This is:
- Permitted if the proceeds are split evenly
- Permitted because criminal cases are matters of public record
- Permitted if the client consents in writing
- Prohibited because a lawyer may not acquire literary or media rights based substantially on the representation before it concludes (Correct answer)
Correct answer: Prohibited because a lawyer may not acquire literary or media rights based substantially on the representation before it concludes
Rule 1.8(d) bars agreements for literary or media rights based substantially on the representation until it has concluded.
Question 114: A declarant, believing his death was imminent from a stabbing, told paramedics who attacked him. He survived. In which Delaware proceeding can the statement come in as a dying declaration?
- Any criminal case, regardless of availability
- Only a homicide case where the declarant actually died
- No proceeding, because the declarant survived
- A homicide prosecution or civil case, but only if the declarant is now unavailable (Correct answer)
Correct answer: A homicide prosecution or civil case, but only if the declarant is now unavailable
Under D.R.E. 804(b)(2), dying declarations require unavailability and apply in homicide prosecutions and civil actions; actual death is not required, only a belief of imminent death.
Question 115: Congress passes a statute requiring state legislatures to enact regulations for disposing of radioactive waste or take title to the waste. The statute is best challenged under which doctrine?
- The nondelegation doctrine
- The Privileges and Immunities Clause of Article IV
- The dormant Commerce Clause
- The anti-commandeering doctrine of the Tenth Amendment (Correct answer)
Correct answer: The anti-commandeering doctrine of the Tenth Amendment
Under New York v. United States, Congress may not commandeer state legislatures by compelling them to enact or administer a federal regulatory program.
Question 116: A thief steals goods and sells them to a good-faith purchaser for value. The original owner sues the purchaser to recover the goods. Who prevails?
- The purchaser, under the entrustment doctrine
- The original owner, because a thief has void title and can pass none (Correct answer)
- They share ownership equally
- The purchaser, because she bought in good faith
Correct answer: The original owner, because a thief has void title and can pass none
A thief acquires void title, so even a good-faith purchaser for value receives no title against the true owner; voidable title and entrustment rules do not apply to stolen goods.
Question 117: What is the main standard a party must meet to succeed in a motion for summary judgment?
- The moving party must demonstrate that the opposing party has no legal standing.
- The moving party must present new evidence that was not available during discovery.
- The moving party must prove the case beyond a reasonable doubt.
- The moving party must show that there are no genuine disputes of material fact and that they are entitled to judgment as a matter of law. (Correct answer)
Correct answer: The moving party must show that there are no genuine disputes of material fact and that they are entitled to judgment as a matter of law.
Summary judgment is granted when the court determines that there are no genuine issues regarding any material fact, and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. This means that based on the undisputed facts, one party clearly wins according to legal principles, making a full trial unnecessary. It's a way to resolve cases efficiently when factual disputes are absent.
Question 118: A state statute bans all outdoor advertising signs except those promoting on-site businesses. A nonprofit challenges the ban as applied to its political billboards. What level of scrutiny applies to the restriction on the nonprofit's political speech?
- No scrutiny, because billboards are not a protected medium
- Rational basis, because aesthetics is a legitimate state interest
- Intermediate scrutiny, because billboards are commercial in nature
- Strict scrutiny, because the regulation is content-based as to noncommercial speech (Correct answer)
Correct answer: Strict scrutiny, because the regulation is content-based as to noncommercial speech
Exempting on-site commercial messages while banning political messages is content-based discrimination against noncommercial speech, triggering strict scrutiny.
Question 119: In Delaware, which standard governs testamentary capacity?
- The testator must understand the nature of the act, the natural objects of her bounty, and the disposition she is making (Correct answer)
- The testator must have capacity to contract at the moment of execution
- The testator must pass a court-ordered psychiatric evaluation
- The testator must be able to manage all her financial affairs
Correct answer: The testator must understand the nature of the act, the natural objects of her bounty, and the disposition she is making
Testamentary capacity requires knowing the property owned, the natural objects of one's bounty, and the effect of the disposition — a lower bar than contractual capacity.
Question 120: A Delaware plaintiff obtains a default judgment against a defendant who never answered. The defendant later moves to vacate, claiming excusable neglect. Under which rule is the motion analyzed?
- Rule 60(b) (Correct answer)
- Rule 50(b)
- Rule 41(a)
- Rule 12(c)
Correct answer: Rule 60(b)
Rule 60(b) governs relief from judgments, including default judgments, on grounds such as mistake, inadvertence, or excusable neglect.
Question 121: A dealer sells a car out of its inventory to a consumer buyer in the ordinary course of business. The dealer's inventory financer holds a perfected security interest in all inventory and did not authorize the sale free of its lien. Does the buyer take free of the security interest?
- No, because the financer never authorized the sale
- Yes, but only if the buyer registers the car within 20 days
- No, because perfected interests always follow the collateral
- Yes, because a buyer in ordinary course takes free of a security interest created by its seller even if perfected and even with knowledge of its existence (Correct answer)
Correct answer: Yes, because a buyer in ordinary course takes free of a security interest created by its seller even if perfected and even with knowledge of its existence
Under UCC 9-320(a), a buyer in ordinary course of business takes free of a security interest created by the buyer's seller, even if perfected and known to the buyer.
Question 122: What is joint and several liability?
- Each defendant can be held liable for the entire amount of damages regardless of their individual fault percentage (Correct answer)
- Only the primary defendant is liable
- Each defendant pays only their proportional share
- Liability is split equally among all parties
Correct answer: Each defendant can be held liable for the entire amount of damages regardless of their individual fault percentage
Under joint and several liability, each defendant is independently responsible for the full amount of damages, allowing the plaintiff to collect the entire judgment from any one defendant.
Question 123: Under the DGCL, what is a Section 102(b)(7) provision?
- An anti-takeover clause in the certificate
- An indemnification bylaw for officers
- A supermajority voting requirement
- A provision eliminating director monetary liability for duty-of-care breaches (Correct answer)
Correct answer: A provision eliminating director monetary liability for duty-of-care breaches
DGCL § 102(b)(7) allows corporations to eliminate or limit director personal liability for breaches of the duty of care, but not the duty of loyalty.
Question 124: A state amends its constitution to bar any local government from enacting anti-discrimination protections for gay and lesbian residents. Under Romer v. Evans, the amendment is:
- Invalid because it fails even rational basis review, resting on bare animus (Correct answer)
- Invalid because sexual orientation is a suspect classification
- Valid because sexual orientation receives only rational basis review
- Valid as an exercise of the state's plenary power over municipalities
Correct answer: Invalid because it fails even rational basis review, resting on bare animus
Romer held that a sweeping disability imposed on a single group, explicable only by animus, lacks a rational relationship to any legitimate purpose.
Question 125: Both parties contract to sell a cow they believe is barren; the cow turns out to be fertile and far more valuable. What doctrine may allow rescission?
- Frustration of purpose
- Unilateral mistake by the seller alone
- Anticipatory repudiation
- Mutual mistake going to a basic assumption of the contract (Correct answer)
Correct answer: Mutual mistake going to a basic assumption of the contract
As in Sherwood v. Walker, a mutual mistake about a basic assumption that materially affects the exchange permits rescission.
Question 126: A contract requires a painter to paint a portrait to the buyer's personal satisfaction. The buyer honestly dislikes the finished portrait. What is the result?
- The condition fails and the buyer need not pay, if the dissatisfaction is in good faith (Correct answer)
- The buyer must pay because a reasonable person would be satisfied
- The painter may sue for quantum meruit only
- The condition is void as illusory
Correct answer: The condition fails and the buyer need not pay, if the dissatisfaction is in good faith
For contracts involving personal taste, honest good-faith dissatisfaction defeats the condition of satisfaction, excusing payment.
Question 127: Delaware's implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing in employment law allows a wrongful discharge claim when an employer:
- Declines to give a performance review
- Reduces an employee's hours
- Terminates an at-will employee without notice
- Falsifies records to create fictitious grounds for termination (Correct answer)
Correct answer: Falsifies records to create fictitious grounds for termination
Delaware recognizes narrow exceptions to at-will employment, including terminations based on employer falsification or deceit under the implied covenant.
Question 128: A plaintiff files suit in Delaware Superior Court but fails to serve the defendant. Under Superior Court Civil Rule 4, what typically happens if service is not made within 120 days of filing?
- The action is automatically dismissed with prejudice
- The action may be dismissed without prejudice as to that defendant unless good cause is shown (Correct answer)
- The court must issue a default judgment against the defendant
- The limitations period is tolled indefinitely
Correct answer: The action may be dismissed without prejudice as to that defendant unless good cause is shown
Like its federal analog, Rule 4 permits dismissal without prejudice if service is not made within 120 days absent a showing of good cause.
Question 129: Which of the following is protected by the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution?
- The right to bear arms.
- The right to privacy in one’s home.
- Freedom of speech, religion, and the press. (Correct answer)
- The right to a speedy trial by jury.
Correct answer: Freedom of speech, religion, and the press.
The First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution is a critical component of the Bill of Rights, explicitly protecting several fundamental individual liberties. These include the freedom of speech, which allows individuals to express their opinions, the freedom of religion, ensuring the right to practice any faith or none, and the freedom of the press, safeguarding the media's ability to report without government censorship. These protections are essential for a democratic society.
Question 130: Under Delaware's long-arm statute, 10 Del. C. § 3104, which act by a nonresident does NOT by itself establish personal jurisdiction in Delaware?
- Causing tortious injury by an act in Delaware
- Contracting to supply services or things in Delaware
- Owning stock in a Delaware corporation (Correct answer)
- Transacting business in Delaware
Correct answer: Owning stock in a Delaware corporation
Mere ownership of stock in a Delaware corporation does not constitute a jurisdictional act under the long-arm statute, while transacting business, in-state torts, and supply contracts do.
Question 131: During litigation, a President asserts an absolute executive privilege to withhold subpoenaed tapes relevant to a criminal trial. Under United States v. Nixon, the claim:
- Succeeds, because executive privilege is absolute for all communications
- Fails, because executive privilege does not exist at all
- Fails, because a generalized privilege yields to the demonstrated need for evidence in a criminal prosecution (Correct answer)
- Succeeds, because courts lack jurisdiction over the President
Correct answer: Fails, because a generalized privilege yields to the demonstrated need for evidence in a criminal prosecution
Nixon recognized a qualified privilege for presidential communications but held it must yield to the specific need for evidence in a pending criminal case.
Question 132: A social guest injured by a hidden defect in a Delaware home is classified at common law as which type of entrant?
- Licensee (Correct answer)
- Invitee
- Business visitor
- Trespasser
Correct answer: Licensee
Social guests are licensees, owed a duty to warn of known hidden dangers but not a duty of reasonable inspection.
Question 133: What standard applies when a Delaware court evaluates whether a defendant's confession was voluntary and admissible?
- Reasonable person standard only
- Clear and convincing evidence of waiver
- Per se rule based on Miranda compliance
- Totality of the circumstances (Correct answer)
Correct answer: Totality of the circumstances
Delaware courts apply the totality of the circumstances test to determine whether a defendant's confession was the product of free and rational choice.
Question 134: A neighbor builds a garage that encroaches two feet onto adjacent land. The adjacent owner knowingly waits until the statutory limitations period expires before suing in ejectment. What is the likely outcome?
- The owner wins because encroachments are continuing trespasses never barred
- The garage must be removed at the encroacher's expense
- The court will order the strip sold at auction
- The claim is barred and the encroacher may have gained title to the strip by adverse possession (Correct answer)
Correct answer: The claim is barred and the encroacher may have gained title to the strip by adverse possession
An open, continuous, hostile encroachment maintained for the full statutory period can ripen into title by adverse possession, barring the ejectment action.
Question 135: What is the purpose of a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim under Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure?
- To argue that the complaint does not contain sufficient facts to support a legal claim. (Correct answer)
- To challenge the court's jurisdiction over the subject matter.
- To compel the opposing party to produce evidence during discovery.
- To request a change of venue for the case.
Correct answer: To argue that the complaint does not contain sufficient facts to support a legal claim.
A motion to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure is a powerful tool used early in litigation. It asserts that even if all the factual allegations in the plaintiff's complaint are true, they do not establish a legally recognized cause of action. Essentially, the defendant argues that the plaintiff has failed to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, warranting dismissal of the case without further proceedings.
Question 136: A private nuisance claim requires the plaintiff to prove:
- A physical invasion of the property
- Substantial and unreasonable interference with use and enjoyment of land (Correct answer)
- Any interference, however trivial
- Interference with a right common to the public
Correct answer: Substantial and unreasonable interference with use and enjoyment of land
Private nuisance protects against substantial and unreasonable interference with a possessor's use and enjoyment of land.
Question 137: Congress conditions 5% of federal highway funds on states raising the drinking age to 21. A state objects that this coerces state policy. The condition is:
- Invalid as commandeering of state legislatures
- Valid because it is related to highway safety and not unduly coercive (Correct answer)
- Valid only if the state actually accepts the funds first
- Invalid because Congress lacks power over alcohol after the Twenty-First Amendment
Correct answer: Valid because it is related to highway safety and not unduly coercive
South Dakota v. Dole upheld this condition as unambiguous, germane to the spending purpose, and a mild inducement rather than coercion.
Question 138: In Delaware, a deficiency judgment after a mortgage foreclosure sale is:
- Permitted, allowing the lender to pursue the borrower for the shortfall (Correct answer)
- Prohibited by statute in all cases
- Capped at 10% of the loan balance
- Permitted only for commercial properties
Correct answer: Permitted, allowing the lender to pursue the borrower for the shortfall
Delaware permits lenders to seek deficiency judgments when foreclosure sale proceeds do not satisfy the debt.
Question 139: During a Delaware personal injury trial, defense counsel offers evidence that the plaintiff has liability insurance covering the incident to suggest the plaintiff was careless. Under D.R.E. 411, the evidence is:
- Admissible if the policy limits are disclosed
- Admissible because insurance is always relevant to damages
- Inadmissible to prove negligent or wrongful conduct (Correct answer)
- Inadmissible only in criminal cases
Correct answer: Inadmissible to prove negligent or wrongful conduct
Rule 411 bars evidence of liability insurance to prove negligence or wrongful conduct, though it may be admitted for other purposes such as bias or ownership.
Question 140: A deed describes property as "beginning at the old oak tree, thence north 200 feet," but the distance conflicts with a monument reference showing 180 feet to a stone marker. Which controls under standard construction rules?
- The parties must split the disputed 20 feet
- The monument (stone marker) controls over the stated distance (Correct answer)
- The stated distance always controls
- The deed is void for uncertainty
Correct answer: The monument (stone marker) controls over the stated distance
In resolving deed description conflicts, natural and artificial monuments take priority over courses and distances.
Question 141: A buyer under an installment contract receives one non-conforming installment. When may the buyer cancel the entire contract?
- Whenever any installment fails perfect tender
- Only if the seller refuses to give assurances
- Never, because installment contracts cannot be cancelled
- Only when the non-conformity substantially impairs the value of the whole contract (Correct answer)
Correct answer: Only when the non-conformity substantially impairs the value of the whole contract
UCC 2-612 permits cancellation of an installment contract only when a default substantially impairs the value of the whole contract.
Question 142: Which standard governs the sufficiency of evidence needed to sustain a Delaware criminal conviction on appeal?
- Whether any rational trier of fact could find guilt beyond a reasonable doubt (Correct answer)
- Preponderance of the evidence
- Clear and convincing evidence
- Substantial evidence test
Correct answer: Whether any rational trier of fact could find guilt beyond a reasonable doubt
Delaware appellate courts apply the Jackson v. Virginia standard, asking whether any rational trier of fact could have found guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.
Question 143: When a Delaware court must apply another state's law, that foreign state's law is treated as:
- A question of fact to be proven by expert witnesses
- A question of law that the court determines, applying that state's statutes and appellate decisions (Correct answer)
- Federal common law serving as a substitute
- Only statutory law, excluding judicial decisions
Correct answer: A question of law that the court determines, applying that state's statutes and appellate decisions
Foreign state law is a question of law; the court determines and applies it as the foreign state's own courts would, including statutes and authoritative case law.
Question 144: A Delaware associate is instructed by a supervising partner to take an action the associate believes may be unethical. The associate is protected from discipline if:
- The associate followed any order from the partner regardless of clarity
- The partner has more than ten years of experience
- The associate documented the disagreement in an email
- The associate acted in accordance with the supervisor's reasonable resolution of an arguable question of professional duty (Correct answer)
Correct answer: The associate acted in accordance with the supervisor's reasonable resolution of an arguable question of professional duty
Rule 5.2(b) shields a subordinate lawyer who acts on a supervisor's reasonable resolution of an arguable ethical question.
Question 145: Two defendants negligently start separate fires that merge and destroy the plaintiff's barn; either fire alone would have destroyed it. What causation test applies?
- Market share liability
- Alternative liability under Summers v. Tice
- But-for test applied to each defendant separately
- Substantial factor test (Correct answer)
Correct answer: Substantial factor test
When multiple sufficient causes combine, the substantial factor test replaces but-for causation so each defendant remains liable.
Question 146: What is the mailbox rule in contract law?
- Contracts must be mailed to be valid
- An offer expires when placed in the mailbox
- All contract communications must be in writing
- An acceptance is effective when dispatched by the offeree, not when received by the offeror (Correct answer)
Correct answer: An acceptance is effective when dispatched by the offeree, not when received by the offeror
The mailbox rule provides that an acceptance becomes effective at the moment of dispatch (when mailed), creating a contract even before the offeror receives it.
Question 147: Police obtain a state court injunction barring a specific newspaper from publishing articles alleging official corruption because the articles are 'malicious.' The injunction is:
- An unconstitutional prior restraint on publication (Correct answer)
- Valid because defamatory speech is unprotected
- Unconstitutional only if the paper proves the articles are true
- Valid because injunctions receive rational basis review
Correct answer: An unconstitutional prior restraint on publication
Near v. Minnesota establishes that enjoining publication in advance is a prior restraint bearing a heavy presumption of unconstitutionality.
Question 148: In Delaware, which court has original jurisdiction over felony criminal cases?
- Justice of the Peace Court
- Court of Common Pleas
- Superior Court (Correct answer)
- Family Court
Correct answer: Superior Court
The Delaware Superior Court has exclusive original jurisdiction over all felony criminal matters.
Question 149: Congress passes a statute directing federal courts to reopen final judgments in cases already dismissed. The statute is:
- Unconstitutional because it violates separation of powers by commanding results in decided Article III cases (Correct answer)
- Constitutional because Congress controls federal jurisdiction
- Constitutional under the Necessary and Proper Clause
- Unconstitutional as an ex post facto law
Correct answer: Unconstitutional because it violates separation of powers by commanding results in decided Article III cases
Plaut v. Spendthrift Farm held Congress may not require Article III courts to reopen final judgments, which invades the judicial power.
Question 150: What is intestate succession?
- A method of inheriting property from international relatives
- The distribution of a deceased person's property according to state law when there is no valid will (Correct answer)
- A type of trust arrangement
- Distribution based on the deceased's verbal wishes
Correct answer: The distribution of a deceased person's property according to state law when there is no valid will
When someone dies without a valid will (intestate), state intestacy statutes determine how their property is distributed, typically prioritizing surviving spouses and descendants.
Question 151: In the Delaware Court of Chancery, what is the primary limitation on the court's subject matter jurisdiction?
- It may only hear cases involving corporations incorporated in Delaware
- It may hear any civil case where damages exceed $50,000
- It may only hear cases involving equitable claims or requests for equitable relief where there is no adequate remedy at law (Correct answer)
- It may only hear appeals from the Superior Court
Correct answer: It may only hear cases involving equitable claims or requests for equitable relief where there is no adequate remedy at law
The Court of Chancery is a court of equity with jurisdiction limited to equitable claims and equitable relief where no adequate remedy at law exists.
Question 152: Delaware follows which standard for admitting expert scientific testimony?
- Automatic admission if the expert is licensed
- The Daubert reliability standard as adopted by the Delaware Supreme Court (Correct answer)
- A jury-decides-reliability approach
- The pure Frye general-acceptance test
Correct answer: The Daubert reliability standard as adopted by the Delaware Supreme Court
Delaware has adopted the Daubert framework, requiring the trial judge to act as gatekeeper on the reliability and relevance of expert testimony under D.R.E. 702.
Question 153: A general contractor uses a subcontractor's bid to win a project, but the subcontractor revokes before the contractor can accept. What doctrine best allows the contractor to enforce the bid?
- Accord and satisfaction
- Promissory estoppel (Correct answer)
- The parol evidence rule
- The mailbox rule
Correct answer: Promissory estoppel
Under Drennan v. Star Paving, promissory estoppel binds a subcontractor whose bid the general contractor foreseeably and detrimentally relied upon.
Question 154: A cotenant in sole possession of jointly owned land pays all property taxes and makes necessary repairs. Absent ouster, what may that cotenant recover from the others?
- Nothing, because possession is its own compensation as a matter of law everywhere
- Contribution for taxes and necessary repairs, offset by the value of sole occupancy in some courts (Correct answer)
- Full reimbursement plus rent for managing the property
- Only the cost of improvements, not taxes
Correct answer: Contribution for taxes and necessary repairs, offset by the value of sole occupancy in some courts
Cotenants may generally seek contribution for carrying costs like taxes and necessary repairs, though courts may offset the rental value of exclusive possession.
Question 155: In a Delaware medical negligence action, an affidavit of merit signed by a qualified expert is generally required:
- At the time the complaint is filed (Correct answer)
- After discovery closes
- Only if the defendant demands one
- Only in wrongful death cases
Correct answer: At the time the complaint is filed
18 Del. C. § 6853 requires most medical negligence complaints to be accompanied by an expert's affidavit of merit.
Question 156: What is specific performance as a contract remedy?
- A performance evaluation of contract compliance
- A penalty clause in the contract
- A court order requiring the breaching party to perform their contractual obligations (Correct answer)
- A monetary payment calculated at a specific rate
Correct answer: A court order requiring the breaching party to perform their contractual obligations
Specific performance is an equitable remedy ordering the breaching party to actually perform their obligations, typically available when monetary damages are inadequate and the subject matter is unique.
Question 157: What is the best evidence rule?
- Only the strongest evidence in a case is admissible
- Original documents must be produced to prove their contents unless an exception applies (Correct answer)
- Physical evidence always takes priority over testimony
- The party with the best evidence wins automatically
Correct answer: Original documents must be produced to prove their contents unless an exception applies
The best evidence rule requires the original writing, recording, or photograph when a party seeks to prove its contents, though copies may be admitted under certain exceptions.
Question 158: What constitutes a fixture in real property law?
- Any item found on the property
- Personal property that has become permanently attached to real property (Correct answer)
- Government-installed improvements only
- Only structural elements like walls and roofs
Correct answer: Personal property that has become permanently attached to real property
A fixture is personal property that has been attached to real property in a manner suggesting permanence, becoming part of the realty and transferring with the property.
Question 159: A merchant sends a signed written offer to sell goods, stating it will remain open for 60 days. Under UCC Article 2, how long is the offer irrevocable without consideration?
- Only 30 days regardless of the stated term
- It is revocable at any time without consideration
- 60 days as stated (Correct answer)
- A maximum of 90 days
Correct answer: 60 days as stated
A merchant's signed firm offer under UCC 2-205 is irrevocable for the stated period, capped at three months, so a 60-day term is fully enforceable.
Question 160: What does the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment guarantee?
- That no state shall deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. (Correct answer)
- That all federal judges must be appointed for life.
- That all federal laws must be applied uniformly across all states.
- That states must provide equal funding for public schools.
Correct answer: That no state shall deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
The Equal Protection Clause, found in the Fourteenth Amendment, is a vital constitutional guarantee that prohibits states from enacting discriminatory laws or policies. Its purpose is to ensure that all individuals are treated equally under the law, preventing arbitrary distinctions or classifications that might disadvantage certain groups. This clause has been central to civil rights movements and legal challenges against discrimination.
Question 161: Under Delaware's rule against perpetuities as applied to trusts, interests in trust personal property may last for how long?
- Indefinitely, because the rule is abolished for personal property held in trust (Correct answer)
- Lives in being plus 21 years
- 110 years
- 90 years under the wait-and-see approach
Correct answer: Indefinitely, because the rule is abolished for personal property held in trust
Delaware abolished the rule against perpetuities for personal property held in trust, permitting perpetual dynasty trusts, while trusts holding real property are limited to 110 years.
Question 162: A criminal defendant in Delaware wants to testify that his co-defendant, now deceased, told a friend, 'I did the robbery alone; my buddy wasn't there.' The statement is best analyzed as:
- A dying declaration
- A statement against penal interest by an unavailable declarant, admissible if corroborating circumstances indicate trustworthiness (Correct answer)
- Inadmissible double hearsay with no exception
- An excited utterance
Correct answer: A statement against penal interest by an unavailable declarant, admissible if corroborating circumstances indicate trustworthiness
Under D.R.E. 804(b)(3), a statement exposing the declarant to criminal liability offered to exculpate the accused requires unavailability plus corroborating circumstances of trustworthiness.
Question 163: An agency changes a longstanding policy through adjudication without explaining the reversal. A court would most likely find the action:
- Immune from review under the committed-to-discretion exception
- Void for vagueness
- Arbitrary and capricious for failure to give a reasoned explanation (Correct answer)
- Valid because agencies never need to explain policy shifts
Correct answer: Arbitrary and capricious for failure to give a reasoned explanation
Agencies must acknowledge and reasonably explain departures from prior policy or the action is arbitrary and capricious.
Question 164: In Delaware, a plaintiff seeking a preliminary injunction in the Court of Chancery must demonstrate which combination of elements?
- Reasonable probability of success on the merits, imminent irreparable harm, and a balance of equities favoring relief (Correct answer)
- Only irreparable harm, since the merits are reserved for trial
- Certainty of success on the merits and monetary damages exceeding $100,000
- A unanimous vote of the board of directors authorizing the suit
Correct answer: Reasonable probability of success on the merits, imminent irreparable harm, and a balance of equities favoring relief
Chancery requires a reasonable probability of merits success, a threat of imminent irreparable injury, and that the balance of hardships tips in the movant's favor.
Question 165: Which constitutional provision requires each state to recognize and enforce valid final judgments of other states?
- Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment
- Dormant Commerce Clause
- Full Faith and Credit Clause of Article IV (Correct answer)
- Supremacy Clause of Article VI
Correct answer: Full Faith and Credit Clause of Article IV
The Full Faith and Credit Clause of Article IV, Section 1 mandates that each state give full faith and credit to the public acts, records, and judicial proceedings of every other state.
Question 166: A non-testifying accomplice's statement to police during a stationhouse interrogation, implicating the defendant, is offered at a Delaware criminal trial. The primary constitutional obstacle is:
- The Confrontation Clause, because the statement is testimonial and the defendant had no opportunity to cross-examine (Correct answer)
- The Due Process Clause's fairness requirement
- The privilege against self-incrimination of the defendant
- The Fourth Amendment exclusionary rule
Correct answer: The Confrontation Clause, because the statement is testimonial and the defendant had no opportunity to cross-examine
Under Crawford v. Washington, testimonial statements of an unavailable declarant are inadmissible unless the defendant had a prior opportunity for cross-examination.
Question 167: Under Delaware's compulsory counterclaim rule, what happens if a defendant fails to assert a claim arising out of the same transaction as the plaintiff's claim?
- The claim is generally barred from being raised in a later action (Correct answer)
- The claim may be freely filed as a new lawsuit at any time
- The court must sever the claim for separate trial
- The claim converts into a cross-claim automatically
Correct answer: The claim is generally barred from being raised in a later action
Under Rule 13(a), a compulsory counterclaim not pleaded is generally waived and barred in subsequent litigation.
Question 168: An expert in a Delaware toxic-tort case bases her opinion on unpublished lab data that is inadmissible hearsay. Her opinion is:
- Inadmissible unless the opposing party stipulates
- Admissible if experts in the field would reasonably rely on such data (Correct answer)
- Admissible only if the data is first admitted into evidence
- Inadmissible because opinions must rest solely on admitted evidence
Correct answer: Admissible if experts in the field would reasonably rely on such data
Under D.R.E. 703, an expert may base an opinion on inadmissible facts or data if experts in the particular field would reasonably rely on them.
Question 169: A state may refuse to recognize a marriage that was valid under the law of the state of celebration under which doctrine?
- The full faith and credit override
- The governmental interest exception
- The comity limitation
- The public policy exception (Correct answer)
Correct answer: The public policy exception
The public policy exception allows a state to deny recognition to a foreign marriage that violates a strong, fundamental public policy of the forum state, even if the marriage was valid where celebrated.
Question 170: A non-Delaware resident accepts a directorship of a Delaware corporation. Under 10 Del. C. § 3114, what is the jurisdictional consequence?
- The director impliedly consents to personal jurisdiction in Delaware for suits involving their conduct as a director (Correct answer)
- The director becomes a Delaware domiciliary for all purposes
- The director may only be sued in their home state
- The director is immune from suit in Delaware courts
Correct answer: The director impliedly consents to personal jurisdiction in Delaware for suits involving their conduct as a director
Section 3114 provides that accepting a directorship of a Delaware corporation constitutes implied consent to Delaware jurisdiction for claims tied to that role.
Question 171: Under Delaware law, when does an appeal to the Delaware Supreme Court from a final Superior Court judgment generally have to be filed?
- Within 30 days after entry of the judgment (Correct answer)
- Within 60 days after entry of the judgment
- Within 10 days after entry of the judgment
- Within 90 days after entry of the judgment
Correct answer: Within 30 days after entry of the judgment
Supreme Court Rule 6 requires a notice of appeal in civil cases to be filed within 30 days after entry of the judgment, and the deadline is jurisdictional.
Question 172: Under Supreme Court Rule 42, what must a party seeking interlocutory review of a Delaware trial court order first do?
- Obtain consent from all opposing parties
- Post a supersedeas bond equal to the judgment amount
- File a notice of appeal directly with the Supreme Court within 10 days
- Apply to the trial court for certification of the interlocutory appeal before seeking acceptance by the Supreme Court (Correct answer)
Correct answer: Apply to the trial court for certification of the interlocutory appeal before seeking acceptance by the Supreme Court
Rule 42 requires the appellant to first seek certification from the trial court, after which the Supreme Court decides in its discretion whether to accept the appeal.
Question 173: A Delaware spendthrift clause in a third-party trust generally has what effect?
- It applies only to income, never principal
- It is void as against public policy
- It protects only against tort creditors
- It bars beneficiaries' creditors from reaching trust interests before distribution (Correct answer)
Correct answer: It bars beneficiaries' creditors from reaching trust interests before distribution
Delaware gives full effect to spendthrift provisions, preventing creditors from attaching a beneficiary's interest until assets are actually distributed.
Question 174: In Delaware practice, which court has exclusive jurisdiction over civil claims for money damages of $50,000 or less where the parties seek a jury trial?
- The Court of Chancery
- The Court of Common Pleas
- The Justice of the Peace Court
- The Superior Court, because the Court of Common Pleas does not conduct jury trials in civil cases (Correct answer)
Correct answer: The Superior Court, because the Court of Common Pleas does not conduct jury trials in civil cases
Civil jury trials in Delaware are held in the Superior Court; the Court of Common Pleas hears civil cases up to $50,000 but without juries.
Question 175: In a Delaware contract dispute, a party seeks to prove the contents of a written agreement through a witness's testimony, without producing the document or explaining its absence. Under the best evidence rule:
- The testimony is inadmissible because the original or an excuse for nonproduction is required (Correct answer)
- The rule applies only to photographs
- The testimony is admissible if the witness signed the contract
- The testimony is admissible because witnesses may always describe documents
Correct answer: The testimony is inadmissible because the original or an excuse for nonproduction is required
When proving the contents of a writing, D.R.E. 1002 requires the original (or a duplicate) unless its absence is satisfactorily explained under Rule 1004.
Question 176: What is the principle of judicial review?
- The authority of Congress to review and amend the decisions of the Supreme Court.
- The process by which states can review and reject federal laws.
- The power of courts to review and invalidate laws or government actions that are found to be unconstitutional. (Correct answer)
- The ability of the executive branch to review and alter judicial rulings.
Correct answer: The power of courts to review and invalidate laws or government actions that are found to be unconstitutional.
Judicial review is a cornerstone of American constitutional law, established in *Marbury v. Madison*. It grants the judiciary the authority to examine legislative acts and executive actions to determine if they comply with the U.S. Constitution. If a law or action is found to be unconstitutional, the courts can declare it void, thereby upholding the supremacy of the Constitution.
Question 177: What is the primary purpose of the discovery process in civil litigation?
- To provide a mechanism for the judge to determine the outcome of the case without a trial.
- To allow parties to obtain evidence and information from each other to prepare for trial. (Correct answer)
- To expedite the trial by eliminating the need for any pre-trial motions.
- To settle disputes between parties before any formal legal proceedings.
Correct answer: To allow parties to obtain evidence and information from each other to prepare for trial.
The discovery process is a critical pre-trial phase in civil litigation designed to prevent surprises at trial and promote fair settlements. It enables parties to gather relevant information, documents, and testimony from opposing parties and non-parties through various tools like interrogatories, depositions, and requests for production. This exchange of information helps parties assess the strengths and weaknesses of their cases and prepare thoroughly for trial.
Question 178: What happens to a security interest when the debtor defaults?
- The court must conduct a public auction
- The security interest is automatically voided
- The debtor must file for bankruptcy
- The secured party may repossess the collateral and either keep it or sell it to satisfy the debt (Correct answer)
Correct answer: The secured party may repossess the collateral and either keep it or sell it to satisfy the debt
Upon default, the secured party has the right to take possession of the collateral (peacefully or by court order) and may dispose of it through commercially reasonable sale or retain it in satisfaction of the debt.
Question 179: Which Delaware statute governs the formation and operation of limited liability companies?
- 6 Del. C. Title 18 (Correct answer)
- 8 Del. C. Title 8
- 6 Del. C. Title 17
- 6 Del. C. Title 15
Correct answer: 6 Del. C. Title 18
The Delaware Limited Liability Company Act is codified at 6 Del. C. §§ 18-101 through 18-1208 (Title 18).
Question 180: Which agency action is generally exempt from notice-and-comment requirements under APA principles?
- A regulation fixing license fees
- A substantive rule imposing new obligations
- A rule repealing an existing substantive regulation
- An interpretive rule or general statement of policy (Correct answer)
Correct answer: An interpretive rule or general statement of policy
Interpretive rules, policy statements, and procedural rules are exempt from notice-and-comment rulemaking.
Question 181: What is the concept of federalism in the context of the U.S. Constitution?
- The authority of the federal government to override state laws.
- The centralization of all governmental powers in the federal government.
- The distribution of power between the federal government and the state governments. (Correct answer)
- The process by which states can create their own constitutions.
Correct answer: The distribution of power between the federal government and the state governments.
Federalism is a core principle of the U.S. Constitution, establishing a system where governmental power is divided and shared between a central (federal) government and regional (state) governments. This division allows states to retain significant autonomy over local matters while the federal government handles national concerns. It creates a balance, preventing excessive centralization of power and allowing for diverse state policies.
Question 182: A state law provides that only landowners may vote in water storage district elections, with votes weighted by land value. The scheme is:
- Valid, because special-purpose districts with disproportionate landowner impact are exempt from one-person-one-vote (Correct answer)
- Invalid, because wealth is a suspect classification
- Valid only if approved by referendum
- Invalid, because it violates one person, one vote
Correct answer: Valid, because special-purpose districts with disproportionate landowner impact are exempt from one-person-one-vote
Salyer and Ball recognize an exception for special limited-purpose districts whose activities disproportionately affect landowners.
Question 183: Which Delaware court handles misdemeanor criminal cases and preliminary hearings for felony offenses?
- Superior Court
- Court of Common Pleas (Correct answer)
- Court of Chancery
- Family Court
Correct answer: Court of Common Pleas
The Delaware Court of Common Pleas has original jurisdiction over misdemeanor criminal cases and conducts preliminary hearings for felonies.
Question 184: A Delaware plaintiff offers a text message allegedly sent by the defendant. The plaintiff authenticates it through the defendant's phone number, distinctive nickname, and references to facts only the defendant knew. This showing is:
- Sufficient only if the defendant admits sending it
- Insufficient without the phone carrier's records
- Sufficient, because authentication requires only evidence adequate to support a finding that the item is what it is claimed to be (Correct answer)
- Insufficient without expert forensic testimony
Correct answer: Sufficient, because authentication requires only evidence adequate to support a finding that the item is what it is claimed to be
Under D.R.E. 901, circumstantial evidence such as distinctive characteristics and content can satisfy the low threshold for authentication.
Question 185: In a diversity jurisdiction case, what is required for a federal court to have jurisdiction over a civil case?
- The case must involve a federal statute, regardless of the parties' states of residence.
- The parties must reside in the same state, and the case must involve a federal question.
- The case must be filed in a state court and then removed to federal court.
- The parties must be from different states, and the amount in controversy must exceed $75,000. (Correct answer)
Correct answer: The parties must be from different states, and the amount in controversy must exceed $75,000.
Diversity jurisdiction allows federal courts to hear civil cases that do not involve a federal question, provided specific criteria are met. The two primary requirements are "diversity of citizenship," meaning all plaintiffs must be citizens of different states from all defendants, and an "amount in controversy" exceeding $75,000. These conditions ensure that federal courts can resolve disputes between citizens of different states where there's a significant financial stake, preventing potential state court bias.
Question 186: A debtor defaults, and the secured party repossesses a delivery van from the debtor's driveway at night without informing the debtor. The debtor was not present and no confrontation occurred. Is the repossession lawful?
- Yes, because the repossession occurred without a breach of the peace (Correct answer)
- No, because self-help repossession always requires prior notice to the debtor
- Yes, but only if a court order was obtained beforehand
- No, because entering the driveway is automatically a breach of the peace
Correct answer: Yes, because the repossession occurred without a breach of the peace
UCC 9-609 permits self-help repossession without notice or judicial process so long as there is no breach of the peace, and a peaceful nighttime taking from a driveway generally qualifies.
Question 187: Under the DGCL, which doctrine requires entire fairness review when a controlling shareholder stands on both sides of a transaction?
- Entire fairness doctrine (Correct answer)
- Revlon duty
- Weinberger standard
- Business judgment rule
Correct answer: Entire fairness doctrine
When a controlling shareholder is on both sides of a transaction, Delaware requires entire fairness review, examining both fair dealing and fair price.
Question 188: Which constitutional provision, as applied through the Fourteenth Amendment, governs search and seizure protections in Delaware criminal proceedings?
- Fourth Amendment (Correct answer)
- Sixth Amendment
- Fifth Amendment
- First Amendment
Correct answer: Fourth Amendment
The Fourth Amendment prohibition on unreasonable searches and seizures applies to state proceedings through the Fourteenth Amendment's Due Process Clause.
Question 189: Under Delaware intestacy, when the decedent is survived by a spouse and by children who are all also children of that spouse, the spouse takes which share of the personal estate?
- One-half of the personal estate with no dollar preference
- The entire personal estate
- The first $50,000 plus one-half of the balance (Correct answer)
- One-third of the personal estate
Correct answer: The first $50,000 plus one-half of the balance
When all surviving issue are also issue of the surviving spouse, the spouse takes the first $50,000 of the intestate personal estate plus one-half of the balance.
Question 190: When dividing marital property in a Delaware divorce, what role does marital misconduct such as adultery play?
- It creates a presumption favoring the innocent spouse
- It shifts the division to a strict 50/50 split
- None; the court divides property equitably without regard to marital misconduct (Correct answer)
- It automatically forfeits the guilty spouse's share of the marital home
Correct answer: None; the court divides property equitably without regard to marital misconduct
13 Del. C. § 1513 directs the court to divide marital property equitably after considering enumerated factors, expressly without regard to marital misconduct.
Question 191: Delaware follows joint and several liability for joint tortfeasors. A defendant who pays more than its proportionate share may seek what from co-defendants?
- Restitution from the court
- Contribution (Correct answer)
- Subrogation against the plaintiff
- Indemnity as of right
Correct answer: Contribution
Delaware's Uniform Contribution Among Tortfeasors Act allows a paying tortfeasor to recover proportionate shares from co-tortfeasors.
Question 192: Characterization (or classification) in conflict of laws is the process of:
- Assessing the domicile of each party to the litigation
- Classifying property as movable or immovable for tax purposes
- Identifying which legal category an issue belongs to — such as tort, contract, or property — which then determines which choice of law rule applies (Correct answer)
- Determining the citizenship of the parties for diversity jurisdiction purposes
Correct answer: Identifying which legal category an issue belongs to — such as tort, contract, or property — which then determines which choice of law rule applies
Characterization is the threshold step of deciding which legal category an issue falls into (e.g., tort vs. contract vs. property) because different choice of law rules govern each category.
Question 193: A judgment debtor in Delaware wants to stay execution of a money judgment pending appeal to the Supreme Court. What is generally required?
- Nothing; appeals automatically stay all judgments
- Approval of a supersedeas bond or other security sufficient to protect the judgment creditor (Correct answer)
- Payment of the full judgment into the court registry in all cases
- A certificate of good faith from trial counsel
Correct answer: Approval of a supersedeas bond or other security sufficient to protect the judgment creditor
A stay of a money judgment pending appeal generally requires a supersedeas bond or equivalent security approved by the court.
Question 194: A plaintiff in a Delaware slip-and-fall case offers evidence that the store installed warning signs the day after her fall. The evidence is offered to prove negligence. It is:
- Admissible as an admission by conduct
- Inadmissible only if the store objects on hearsay grounds
- Inadmissible as a subsequent remedial measure (Correct answer)
- Admissible because safety evidence is always relevant
Correct answer: Inadmissible as a subsequent remedial measure
D.R.E. 407 bars evidence of subsequent remedial measures to prove negligence, though it may be admitted for other purposes like ownership, control, or feasibility if disputed.
Question 195: Under Delaware corporate law, which document controls in a conflict between the certificate of incorporation and the bylaws?
- The certificate of incorporation, as the superior governing document (Correct answer)
- The board resolution most recently passed
- The shareholder agreement, if one exists
- The bylaws, as the most recently adopted document
Correct answer: The certificate of incorporation, as the superior governing document
The certificate of incorporation is the superior governing document and controls over conflicting bylaw provisions under the DGCL.
Question 196: A litigant challenges the President's decision to recognize a foreign government, asking the court to declare the recognition invalid. The court should:
- Abstain under Pullman
- Dismiss under the political question doctrine, as recognition is textually committed to the executive (Correct answer)
- Decide the merits, because all executive actions are reviewable
- Certify the question to the Senate
Correct answer: Dismiss under the political question doctrine, as recognition is textually committed to the executive
Recognition of foreign sovereigns is committed exclusively to the President, making the challenge a nonjusticiable political question, as confirmed in Zivotofsky.
Question 197: A state criminalizes advocating the overthrow of the government. A speaker at a rally makes abstract calls for revolution 'someday.' A conviction is:
- Unconstitutional only if the speaker was a journalist
- Constitutional because sedition is unprotected
- Unconstitutional under Brandenburg, because the speech was not directed to imminent lawless action likely to occur (Correct answer)
- Constitutional if the crowd was angry
Correct answer: Unconstitutional under Brandenburg, because the speech was not directed to imminent lawless action likely to occur
Brandenburg protects abstract advocacy of violence unless it is directed to inciting imminent lawless action and likely to produce it.
Question 198: A bystander witnesses a close relative's injury caused by negligence. Under the zone-of-danger approach to NIED, the bystander must show:
- The relative died from the injuries
- They were themselves at risk of physical impact and feared for their safety (Correct answer)
- A contractual relationship with the defendant
- Only that they observed the accident from any location
Correct answer: They were themselves at risk of physical impact and feared for their safety
The zone-of-danger rule limits NIED recovery to plaintiffs who were personally threatened with physical impact.
Question 199: When an attorney represents a new client with interests adverse to a former client, what must the attorney consider under the Delaware Rules of Professional Conduct?
- Whether the new client’s interests conflict with the attorney’s personal interests.
- Whether the new client’s case is more financially beneficial to the attorney.
- Whether the former client has agreed to the new representation.
- Whether the new representation involves a matter that is substantially related to the former client's representation, and if so, whether the former client’s interests are materially adverse. (Correct answer)
Correct answer: Whether the new representation involves a matter that is substantially related to the former client's representation, and if so, whether the former client’s interests are materially adverse.
Under Rule 1.9 of the Delaware Rules of Professional Conduct, an attorney has a duty of loyalty and confidentiality to former clients. Before representing a new client with adverse interests, the attorney must determine if the new matter is 'substantially related' to the former representation and if the former client's interests are 'materially adverse.' This prevents the misuse of confidential information and upholds the integrity of the attorney-client relationship.
Question 200: A party in a Delaware civil case objects that relevant evidence should be excluded under D.R.E. 403. Exclusion is proper only if the probative value is:
- Equal to the prejudicial effect
- Substantially outweighed by dangers such as unfair prejudice, confusion, or waste of time (Correct answer)
- Merely outweighed by any prejudice
- Challenged by both parties
Correct answer: Substantially outweighed by dangers such as unfair prejudice, confusion, or waste of time
Rule 403 tilts toward admissibility, excluding relevant evidence only when its probative value is substantially outweighed by countervailing dangers.
Delaware Bar Examination
The Delaware Bar Examination tests candidates on multistate and Delaware-specific legal subjects across civil procedure, constitutional law, contracts, criminal law, evidence, real property, torts, business organizations, conflict of laws, and professional responsibility. Delaware has not adopted the UBE and administers its own unique 2.5-day examination annually.
Exam Rules
- You can skip questions and return to them later
- Flag questions for review before submitting
- No feedback shown until you submit the entire exam
- Unanswered questions count as wrong — answer everything
- 10 pretest questions are mixed in and don't affect your score
- Timer auto-submits when time runs out
- Your progress is auto-saved every 30 seconds