← All CSI Flashcard Decks

Courtroom Testimony and Ethics Flashcards

7 cards from real CSI practice questions. Tap to flip, then mark Knew It or Still Learning — missed cards come back until you master them.

Read the first 7 Courtroom Testimony and Ethics flashcards as text
  1. When a defense attorney asks a CSI a question that assumes facts not in evidence, the CSI should:

    Answer: Correct the false assumption before answering

    A CSI must not allow misleading premises to stand; correcting the assumption preserves accuracy and credibility.

  2. A CSI discovers mid-trial that a piece of evidence was mislabeled in the chain of custody. The ethical obligation is to:

    Answer: Notify the prosecutor so the error can be disclosed

    Ethical standards require prompt disclosure of chain-of-custody errors regardless of which side it may help or hurt.

  3. The term 'scope of expertise' in expert testimony means a CSI should:

    Answer: Only offer opinions within their trained specialization

    Courts require experts to limit opinions to areas where they have documented training and experience.

  4. If a CSI is asked during cross-examination 'Isn't it possible that someone else left that fingerprint?' the most appropriate response is:

    Answer: 'I can only state what the evidence shows, not speculate on all possibilities.'

    A CSI should report findings without overstating certainty or speculating beyond the evidence.

  5. Which behavior constitutes 'dry-labbing' in forensic science?

    Answer: Reporting results without actually performing the analysis

    Dry-labbing—fabricating or skipping analysis while recording results—is a serious ethical violation that has led to wrongful convictions.

  6. A CSI receives a phone call from a victim's family member asking about case findings before trial. The CSI should:

    Answer: Decline and direct them to the prosecutor's office

    Disclosing case information outside official channels violates confidentiality protocols and can compromise the trial.

  7. Under the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment, a defendant has the right to:

    Answer: Cross-examine the analyst who performed forensic testing

    The Supreme Court's ruling in Melendez-Diaz v. Massachusetts held that forensic analysts must be available for cross-examination.