Courtroom Testimony and Ethics Flashcards
7 cards from real CSI practice questions. Tap to flip, then mark Knew It or Still Learning — missed cards come back until you master them.
Read the first 7 Courtroom Testimony and Ethics flashcards as text
When a defense attorney asks a CSI a question that assumes facts not in evidence, the CSI should:
Answer: Correct the false assumption before answering
A CSI must not allow misleading premises to stand; correcting the assumption preserves accuracy and credibility.
A CSI discovers mid-trial that a piece of evidence was mislabeled in the chain of custody. The ethical obligation is to:
Answer: Notify the prosecutor so the error can be disclosed
Ethical standards require prompt disclosure of chain-of-custody errors regardless of which side it may help or hurt.
The term 'scope of expertise' in expert testimony means a CSI should:
Answer: Only offer opinions within their trained specialization
Courts require experts to limit opinions to areas where they have documented training and experience.
If a CSI is asked during cross-examination 'Isn't it possible that someone else left that fingerprint?' the most appropriate response is:
Answer: 'I can only state what the evidence shows, not speculate on all possibilities.'
A CSI should report findings without overstating certainty or speculating beyond the evidence.
Which behavior constitutes 'dry-labbing' in forensic science?
Answer: Reporting results without actually performing the analysis
Dry-labbing—fabricating or skipping analysis while recording results—is a serious ethical violation that has led to wrongful convictions.
A CSI receives a phone call from a victim's family member asking about case findings before trial. The CSI should:
Answer: Decline and direct them to the prosecutor's office
Disclosing case information outside official channels violates confidentiality protocols and can compromise the trial.
Under the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment, a defendant has the right to:
Answer: Cross-examine the analyst who performed forensic testing
The Supreme Court's ruling in Melendez-Diaz v. Massachusetts held that forensic analysts must be available for cross-examination.