Equity Securities Valuation Flashcards
7 cards from real CSC practice questions. Tap to flip, then mark Knew It or Still Learning — missed cards come back until you master them.
Read the first 7 Equity Securities Valuation flashcards as text
A stock's required rate of return is 9% and it just paid a $2.00 dividend expected to grow at 5% forever. What is its intrinsic value using the Gordon Growth Model?
Answer: $52.50
V = D1 ÷ (r − g) = ($2.00 × 1.05) ÷ (0.09 − 0.05) = $2.10 ÷ 0.04 = $52.50.
Which statement best describes the difference between 'relative valuation' and 'absolute valuation'?
Answer: Absolute valuation estimates intrinsic worth from fundamentals; relative valuation benchmarks a stock against peers using multiples
Absolute valuation (e.g., DDM, DCF) estimates stand-alone intrinsic value, while relative valuation compares multiples such as P/E to industry peers.
What does a high return on equity (ROE) indicate when used in equity valuation?
Answer: The company generates significant profit relative to shareholders' equity, often justifying a premium valuation
A high ROE indicates efficient use of equity capital and typically supports higher P/B ratios and valuation premiums.
An investor applies a P/E multiple of 18× to forecast EPS of $3.50. What is the target share price?
Answer: $63.00
Target price = P/E × EPS = 18 × $3.50 = $63.00.
In equity analysis, what is the 'margin of safety'?
Answer: The gap between a stock's intrinsic value and its current market price, providing a buffer against errors
Margin of safety is the discount at which a stock trades below its estimated intrinsic value, cushioning the investor against misjudgment.
Which factor would DECREASE the theoretical P/E ratio a stock should command, all else equal?
Answer: An increase in financial risk and uncertainty
Greater financial risk raises the required rate of return, which compresses the justified P/E multiple.
When using comparable company multiples, why must an analyst adjust for differences in growth rates and risk?
Answer: Differences in growth and risk cause multiples to differ; failing to adjust leads to inaccurate valuation conclusions
A high-growth, low-risk peer commands a higher multiple than a low-growth, high-risk company, so raw multiple comparisons without adjustment are misleading.