Legal Framework & Constitutional Law Flashcards
7 cards from real CPI practice questions. Tap to flip, then mark Knew It or Still Learning — missed cards come back until you master them.
Read the first 7 Legal Framework & Constitutional Law flashcards as text
Under tort law, what must a plaintiff generally prove to establish negligence against a home inspector?
Answer: Duty, breach, causation, and damages
Negligence requires proving the inspector owed a duty, breached that duty, the breach caused harm, and actual damages resulted.
A limitation of liability clause in a pre-inspection agreement that caps damages at the inspection fee is generally:
Answer: Enforceable in most states if conspicuous and voluntarily signed
Most states allow limitation of liability clauses when they are clearly written, conspicuous, and the client signs voluntarily without coercion.
Errors and Omissions (E&O) insurance for home inspectors primarily covers:
Answer: Professional mistakes and omissions in inspection reports
E&O insurance is professional liability coverage protecting inspectors against claims that they missed defects or made errors in their reports.
Which contract element is most critical in defining the scope of a home inspection?
Answer: The pre-inspection agreement signed before the inspection begins
The pre-inspection agreement legally defines what systems will be inspected, excluded, and the limitations of the inspection scope.
The statute of limitations for filing a claim against a home inspector typically begins when:
Answer: The client discovers or reasonably should have discovered the defect
The 'discovery rule' starts the limitations clock when the harm is or should have been discovered, not necessarily at the inspection date.
If an inspector's pre-inspection agreement contains an arbitration clause, what is the primary legal effect?
Answer: Disputes must be resolved through arbitration rather than a court lawsuit
A valid arbitration clause requires parties to submit disputes to an arbitrator rather than litigate in civil court.
Which legal doctrine allows a client to sue a home inspector even without a direct contract between them?
Answer: Third-party beneficiary doctrine
Under the third-party beneficiary doctrine, someone who was intended to benefit from the inspection contract (such as a buyer in a seller-paid inspection) may have legal standing to sue.