← All CODESP Flashcard Decks

Making Final Selection Decisions Flashcards

7 cards from real CODESP practice questions. Tap to flip, then mark Knew It or Still Learning — missed cards come back until you master them.

Read the first 7 Making Final Selection Decisions flashcards as text
  1. A public sector employer uses an open-competitive eligible list ranked by total exam score. Which action would most likely violate merit principles if taken during final selection from that list?

    Answer: Skipping a higher-ranked candidate in favor of a lower-ranked candidate without documented, job-related justification

    Bypassing a higher-ranked eligible candidate without legitimate, documented job-related reasons violates the rank-order merit principle central to civil service selection.

  2. What is the primary goal of 'validity generalization' evidence in supporting a final selection decision when a local validation study has not been conducted?

    Answer: To show that a body of prior research supports the validity of the predictor for similar jobs across multiple settings

    Validity generalization uses meta-analytic evidence to argue that a predictor's validity, demonstrated across many studies, is likely to generalize to the current job and setting.

  3. During a final review of selection documentation, a CODESP practitioner discovers that the cut score was established before the validity study was completed. This sequencing represents which type of problem?

    Answer: A procedural validity threat because the cut score was not empirically grounded in job performance data

    Setting a cut score prior to completing the validity study means the score threshold lacks empirical support from performance data, undermining its defensibility.

  4. Which condition makes a 'whole-person' evaluation approach most appropriate as the final integration step in selection?

    Answer: When quantitative scores alone do not fully capture complex competencies critical to senior or unique roles

    Whole-person evaluation is most defensible for senior or specialized roles where integrating qualitative evidence (e.g., portfolio review, executive interview) alongside scores provides a more complete picture.

  5. Under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), if a candidate requests reasonable accommodation during final selection assessments, the employer must:

    Answer: Provide an accommodation that allows the candidate to demonstrate their KSAOs unless doing so creates undue hardship

    The ADA requires employers to provide reasonable accommodations in testing so that candidates with disabilities can demonstrate their actual knowledge, skills, and abilities.

  6. A selection system produces a composite score from a written exam (weight=0.60) and a structured oral interview (weight=0.40). If a candidate scores 80 on the exam and 70 on the interview, what is their weighted composite score?

    Answer: 76.0

    The composite is (80 × 0.60) + (70 × 0.40) = 48 + 28 = 76.0.

  7. Which of the following best describes the 'expectancy chart' as a tool used in communicating final selection decision validity to stakeholders?

    Answer: A chart showing the probability that candidates in various score ranges will be successful on the job

    An expectancy chart displays, for each score interval, the likelihood that candidates in that range will achieve satisfactory job performance, making validity evidence intuitive for decision-makers.