Group Process & Dynamics Flashcards
7 cards from real CFE practice questions. Tap to flip, then mark Knew It or Still Learning — missed cards come back until you master them.
Read the first 7 Group Process & Dynamics flashcards as text
When investigating a group fraud, a CFE discovers that newer members were gradually introduced to the scheme over time rather than recruited all at once. This technique is known as:
Answer: Incremental commitment
Incremental commitment draws new members deeper into misconduct through small, escalating steps that make exit increasingly difficult.
A CFE finds evidence that a fraud ring held regular social events to strengthen loyalty and reduce the likelihood of defection. This strategy exploits which psychological mechanism?
Answer: Affective commitment
Affective commitment — emotional attachment to a group — reduces the likelihood that members will report misconduct or leave the group.
In a fraud investigation, the CFE notes that the ring's members rationalized their actions by claiming they were only hurting a large corporation, not real people. This neutralization technique is called:
Answer: Denial of injury
Denial of injury involves claiming the act caused no real harm, often by depersonalizing victims such as corporations or insurance companies.
Which forensic interviewing approach is most effective at breaking down group loyalty and eliciting truthful disclosures from members of a fraud ring?
Answer: Building individual rapport and presenting evidence of others' cooperation
Building individual rapport and suggesting that others are already cooperating exploits the prisoner's dilemma dynamic to incentivize disclosure.
A CFE observes that after the fraud scheme was uncovered, several participants minimized their roles by comparing themselves to the 'worst' perpetrators. This is an example of:
Answer: Social comparison downward
Downward social comparison involves evaluating oneself favorably relative to worse-off others to protect self-image and minimize perceived culpability.
In group fraud dynamics, 'anchor bias' during internal investigations can cause investigators to:
Answer: Over-rely on the first evidence reviewed, skewing their overall assessment
Anchoring bias causes investigators to weight early information disproportionately, potentially distorting their interpretation of subsequent evidence.
A fraud examiner is reviewing a scheme where group members used peer pressure to ensure silence. Which type of evidence would most directly demonstrate this dynamic?
Answer: Communications showing threats or warnings directed at potential informants
Communications containing threats, warnings, or intimidation directed at members considering disclosure directly evidence the use of peer pressure to enforce silence.