MCOLES - Michigan Commission on Law Enforcement Standards Use of Force Principles Questions and Answers — Questions and Answers
Question 1: According to the MCOLES Subject Control Continuum, an officer's response to a subject's actions must be an 'objectively reasonable response to the perceived threat'. This standard was established by which landmark U.S. Supreme Court case?
- Miranda v. Arizona
- Terry v. Ohio
- Graham v. Connor (Correct answer)
- Tennessee v. Garner
Correct answer: Graham v. Connor
The 'objectively reasonable' standard for the use of force by law enforcement was established in the 1989 Supreme Court case Graham v. Connor. This case requires that an officer's actions be judged from the perspective of a reasonable officer on the scene, considering the totality of the circumstances, rather than with 20/20 hindsight.
Question 2: An officer confronts a subject who is shouting, clenching their fists, and has taken a bladed stance but has not made any physical advance. According to the MCOLES Subject Control Continuum, this subject's actions would most accurately be categorized as:
- Passive Resistance
- Active Resistance
- Active Aggression
- Inactive Resistance (Correct answer)
Correct answer: Inactive Resistance
The MCOLES Subject Control Continuum defines Inactive Resistance as actions that may include psychological intimidation and/or verbal resistance, such as a blank stare, clenching of fists, or tightening of jaw muscles. The subject has not yet physically resisted or attacked, making 'Inactive Resistance' the correct classification.
Question 3: An officer is attempting to arrest a suspect for retail fraud. The suspect pulls their arm away and tries to run. Which of the following force options would be most appropriate for the officer to use first, based on the MCOLES training guide?
- Deadly Force
- Intermediate Controls (e.g., impact weapon)
- Physical Controls (e.g., takedown/pain compliance) (Correct answer)
- Deployment of a TASER
Correct answer: Physical Controls (e.g., takedown/pain compliance)
The suspect is exhibiting Active Resistance by pulling away and attempting to flee. The MCOLES continuum suggests that an appropriate response to Active Resistance would be Physical Controls, which can include techniques to take the subject to the ground or use pain compliance to gain control before escalating to higher levels of force.
Question 4: Which of the following is a key principle of the MCOLES Use of Force model regarding de-escalation?
- De-escalation is only required after deadly force has been used.
- An officer must always attempt every level of the continuum before escalating.
- Force must be reduced proportionally as a subject's resistance decreases. (Correct answer)
- De-escalation tactics are discouraged when multiple officers are on scene.
Correct answer: Force must be reduced proportionally as a subject's resistance decreases.
A core concept of the MCOLES Subject Control Continuum is that officers must de-escalate the use of force as a subject's resistance decreases or they come under control. The process is dynamic, requiring officers to adjust their force levels up and down based on the subject's actions.
Question 5: Under MCOLES guidelines and established case law, deadly force is justified to apprehend a fleeing felon ONLY when the officer has probable cause to believe the suspect:
- Has just committed any felony crime.
- Poses a significant threat of serious physical injury or death to the officer or others. (Correct answer)
- Is likely to escape if not immediately apprehended by any means.
- Refuses to comply with verbal commands to stop.
Correct answer: Poses a significant threat of serious physical injury or death to the officer or others.
Based on Tennessee v. Garner and MCOLES training objectives, deadly force may be used on a fleeing felon only when the officer has probable cause to believe the suspect poses an imminent threat of serious physical harm or death to the officer or others. The severity of the threat is the critical factor, not just the fact that a felony was committed.
Question 6: When an officer's use of force is legally reviewed, the 'totality of the circumstances' is considered. Which of the following factors is NOT part of the 'objective reasonableness' standard established in Graham v. Connor?
- The severity of the crime at issue.
- The officer's subjective intent or motivation. (Correct answer)
- Whether the suspect posed an immediate threat to the safety of officers or others.
- Whether the suspect was actively resisting arrest or attempting to flee.
Correct answer: The officer's subjective intent or motivation.
The Supreme Court in Graham v. Connor explicitly stated that the reasonableness of a use of force is judged by an objective standard, 'without regard to their underlying intent or motivation.' The officer's personal feelings, anger, or good intentions are not the focus; the analysis centers on what a reasonable officer would have done given the same set of facts and circumstances.
According to the MCOLES Subject Control Continuum, an officer's response to a subject's actions must be an 'objectively reasonable response to the perceived threat'.
This standard was established by which landmark U.S.
Supreme Court case?