LAPD - Los Angeles Police Department Background Investigation Standards Questions and Answers 1 — Questions and Answers
Question 1: During the LAPD background investigation, a candidate admits to occasional marijuana use several years ago, prior to it being legal for recreational use, but has not used any illegal substances in the last three years. How is this information most likely to be evaluated?
- It will be considered an automatic disqualification due to the past illegal activity.
- The investigator will evaluate the recency, frequency, and circumstances of the use as part of the 'whole person' assessment. (Correct answer)
- The candidate will be required to take additional drug tests for a period of five years.
- It will be disregarded entirely since the use was not recent.
Correct answer: The investigator will evaluate the recency, frequency, and circumstances of the use as part of the 'whole person' assessment.
The LAPD evaluates past drug use on a case-by-case basis, considering the 'whole person'. Key factors include the type of substance, frequency of use, and time elapsed since last use. While hard drug use is often disqualifying, past marijuana use, especially if not recent or frequent, is evaluated within the broader context of the candidate's life and choices. Absolute honesty about past use is critical.
Question 2: Which of the following is an automatic and permanent disqualifier for any applicant to the Los Angeles Police Department?
- A poor credit score with several accounts in collections.
- Being fired from a previous job for poor attendance.
- A felony conviction as an adult. (Correct answer)
- Multiple speeding tickets within the last five years.
Correct answer: A felony conviction as an adult.
A felony conviction is an automatic and permanent disqualifier for becoming a police officer with the LAPD and other law enforcement agencies. While financial issues, employment history, and driving records are scrutinized heavily and can lead to disqualification, they are typically evaluated on a case-by-case basis, whereas a felony conviction legally bars an individual from holding the position.
Question 3: An LAPD applicant was terminated from a job five years ago for a policy violation. On the Personal History Statement, the applicant intentionally lists the reason for leaving as 'laid off' to avoid a negative perception. During the field investigation, the truth is discovered. What is the most likely outcome?
- The investigator will overlook the issue since it happened long ago.
- The applicant will be given a chance to explain the discrepancy in a follow-up interview.
- The applicant will be disqualified for dishonesty and lack of integrity. (Correct answer)
- The applicant's file will be noted, but the process will continue if the rest of the record is clean.
Correct answer: The applicant will be disqualified for dishonesty and lack of integrity.
Honesty, integrity, and being forthcoming during the selection process are paramount standards for the LAPD. Deliberately falsifying information or omitting key facts on an application is considered a serious integrity violation. Often, the act of dishonesty itself is more disqualifying than the original event the candidate was trying to hide.
Question 4: A candidate for the LAPD has a significant amount of student loan and credit card debt, resulting in a low credit score. However, they have never missed a payment and have a clear budget plan they are following. How will a background investigator most likely view this situation?
- As an automatic disqualification due to the high amount of debt.
- Positively, as it demonstrates financial responsibility and maturity despite the debt. (Correct answer)
- Negatively, as any significant debt is considered a potential risk for corruption.
- Neutrally, as personal finances are not a major component of the investigation.
Correct answer: Positively, as it demonstrates financial responsibility and maturity despite the debt.
LAPD background investigators look for a pattern of financial irresponsibility, such as late payments or accounts in collections, not just the existence of debt. A candidate who manages their debt responsibly, lives within their means, and meets their obligations demonstrates the maturity and discipline the department values. The focus is on fiscal responsibility, not being debt-free.
Question 5: Which of the following best describes the LAPD's standard regarding a candidate's driving history?
- Only DUI convictions are considered for disqualification.
- A candidate's driving record is reviewed as an indicator of their judgment and respect for the law. (Correct answer)
- Any at-fault traffic collision within the last two years is an automatic disqualification.
- Parking tickets and minor infractions are completely ignored.
Correct answer: A candidate's driving record is reviewed as an indicator of their judgment and respect for the law.
The LAPD views a candidate's driving record as a reflection of their overall judgment, maturity, and willingness to obey laws and regulations. While a single ticket is unlikely to be an issue, a pattern of moving violations, at-fault accidents, or license suspensions can indicate poor judgment or a disregard for public safety, which are disqualifying traits.
Question 6: During the background investigation, which area of a candidate's life is subject to the most intense scrutiny to determine their honesty and integrity?
- Their academic performance in high school.
- The completeness and truthfulness of their Personal History Statement (PHS). (Correct answer)
- Their physical fitness records and gym attendance.
- The number of jobs they have held in the past ten years.
Correct answer: The completeness and truthfulness of their Personal History Statement (PHS).
The Personal History Statement (PHS) is the foundation of the entire background investigation. Investigators meticulously verify every piece of information provided. Any omission, inconsistency, or outright lie discovered when checking records or interviewing contacts is a primary reason for disqualification, as it directly reflects on the candidate's core honesty and integrity.
During the LAPD background investigation, a candidate admits to occasional marijuana use several years ago, prior to it being legal for recreational use, but has not used any illegal substances in the last three years.
How is this information most likely to be evaluated?