Free AP English Language & Composition Question and Answers — Questions and Answers
Question 1: Which of the following is NOT true about Mr. Severe?
- A man with very little humanity
- A disgusting, cruel slave owner (Correct answer)
- A sadistic tyrant
- So brutal that the slaves viewed his death as a blessing
Correct answer: A disgusting, cruel slave owner
The question asks what is *not* true about Mr. Severe. If "A disgusting, cruel slave owner" is the correct answer, it means that, according to the passage, this description is inaccurate for Mr. Severe. This would imply the passage portrays him in a way that contradicts the common understanding of his character from Frederick Douglass's narrative, where he is indeed depicted as highly cruel and inhumane.
Question 2: Which of the following best describes the passage's literary style?
- personal anecdote (Correct answer)
- historical summation
- persuasive essay
- extended dissertation
Correct answer: personal anecdote
A personal anecdote is a short, individual account of an event or experience. Given that this passage is likely from Frederick Douglass's autobiography, it would recount specific, personal experiences from his life as a slave. This makes it a direct, first-person narrative focused on a particular incident, fitting the definition of a personal anecdote.
Question 3: Which response best captures the tone or mood of the author in this passage?
- Laconic
- Outraged (Correct answer)
- Melancholy
- Demanding
Correct answer: Outraged
Passages describing the extreme cruelty of slave owners and the suffering of enslaved people, especially from a former slave's perspective, are typically infused with strong moral condemnation. An "outraged" tone reflects the author's intense indignation and anger at the inhumane treatment and injustices depicted, aiming to evoke a similar emotional response in the reader.
Question 4: Who was Colonel Lloyd, according to the passage's implicit meaning?
- Another overseer
- A black commissioned officer
- A relative of the author’s
- A white slave owner (Correct answer)
Correct answer: A white slave owner
In Frederick Douglass's narrative, Colonel Lloyd was the wealthy and powerful owner of the plantation where Douglass was born. As the ultimate authority figure who owned thousands of slaves and oversaw the entire system, his role was clearly that of a white slave owner. The passage would implicitly establish this hierarchy and his position of power over overseers like Mr. Severe.
Question 5: Which of the following conclusions about the author can be drawn?
- He was frequently whipped
- He overcame a lot to become a talented writer (Correct answer)
- He was well-liked by his fellow slaves
- He moved plantations frequently
Correct answer: He overcame a lot to become a talented writer
The very act of writing and publishing a detailed, articulate narrative about the brutalities of slavery demonstrates the author's significant literary talent. Given that enslaved people were systematically denied education, the author's ability to produce such a powerful text indicates he overcame immense obstacles to achieve literacy and become a skilled writer, a testament to his resilience and intellect.
Question 6: The phrase "cursing, raging, hacking and slashing" is used by the author to
- reveal the mercurial character of Mr. Severe
- compare Mr. Severe personality with that of Mr. Hopkins
- exemplify the level of humiliation slaves faced in the South
- emphasize the violence inflicted on the slaves by Mr. Severe (Correct answer)
Correct answer: emphasize the violence inflicted on the slaves by Mr. Severe
The phrase "cursing, raging, hacking and slashing" uses a series of vivid, aggressive verbs to create a powerful image of Mr. Severe's brutal behavior. This strong, descriptive language directly conveys the physical and verbal aggression he inflicted upon the enslaved people, thereby emphasizing the extreme violence and terror that characterized his actions as an overseer.
Question 7: What about the passage's final sentence is ironic?
- Mr. Severe was quieter than Mr. Hopkins even though he was meaner.
- The slaves are describing a man who forces them to work for free and punishes them with a whip as “good.” (Correct answer)
- Mr. Hopkins took no pleasure in beating the slaves the way that Mr. Severe did.
- The slaves thought he was not a good overseer because he treated them better.
Correct answer: The slaves are describing a man who forces them to work for free and punishes them with a whip as “good.”
Irony occurs when there is a stark contrast between expectation and reality. If enslaved people describe an overseer who still forces them into unpaid labor and punishes them with a whip as "good," it highlights the deeply warped reality of their lives. Their definition of "good" is tragically relative, meaning merely "less terrible" compared to the even more extreme cruelty they typically endure, rather than genuinely benevolent treatment.
Which of the following is NOT true about Mr.
Severe?