Failed CA P2 twice – anyone have a structured approach that actually worked?

Partial disposals broke me as well. What helped was drawing out the group structure for every question before touching the numbers. Sounds slow but it prevents the ownership percentage errors that cost the most marks.

Past papers under timed conditions is the answer. I failed twice too and the third pass came after I stopped reading theory and just did papers, marked them hard, and wrote out exactly why each wrong answer was wrong. Theory revision on its own doesn't build exam technique.

Also worth checking whether your mock exams are at the right difficulty level. Some prep providers pitch easier questions than the real exam. The official past papers are harder and better practice than most third-party materials.

Ten weeks is enough time if you restructure now. I'd suggest 80% question practice, 20% reviewing specific topics you keep missing. Failing questions and learning from them beats reading notes you already know.

I was in almost the exact same spot last year, 55% on my second attempt and ready to give up. What actually clicked for me was stopping all the topic-based practice and doing question types instead — I'd drill consolidation questions back to back until I could spot the pattern, not just understand the concept. Group accounts especially, you need to see like 30 of them before your brain stops treating each one as a new problem.

Also worth mentioning: I spent time on ca tax planning preparation separately because P2 loves to layer tax into consolidation scenarios and I wasn't connecting those two areas. Once I did that and switched to timed question blocks instead of open-ended study sessions, my third attempt felt completely different. The jump from understanding to applying just takes a specific kind of repetition that most people don't push through.

I was in the exact same spot after my second fail -- 55% and I genuinely thought about just quitting the whole thing. What actually helped me wasn't studying more concepts, it was changing how I practiced questions. I stopped reading the answer after getting one wrong and trying to understand it immediately. Instead I'd write down what I was actually thinking when I chose my wrong answer, because the exam is testing whether you can apply the rules in a specific way, not just recite them.

For group accounts and consolidations specifically, the thing that clicked for me was working through past papers in timed conditions and then going back to trace exactly where my logic broke down. It's tedious but it exposes the gaps in a way that passive review just doesn't. You're probably closer than you think -- going from 52% to 54% means something is working, it's just not enough yet.

I was in almost the exact same spot a few months ago, hovering around 53-55% and feeling like I understood the material but kept bombing the actual questions. What finally clicked for me was drilling timed question sets instead of just re-reading notes -- especially for group accounts. I also spent a lot of time on ca corporate finance investment questions because that's where I was losing the most marks without realizing it.

Just hit 68% on my last full mock, which honestly felt unreal after those two fails. I'm sitting the real thing in October so I've got a few weeks to keep grinding. Don't give up -- the jump from 54% to passing is closer than it feels right now.

I was in almost the exact same spot six months ago, failed twice with scores embarrassingly close to yours. The thing that actually clicked for me was stopping generic practice and drilling specifically on ca corporate finance investment questions in isolation until the patterns felt automatic, not just familiar. It's a different skill set than understanding the theory.

For consolidations specifically, I started drawing the group structure by hand before touching any numbers. Sounds basic but it forced me to slow down and stop making assumptions about what the question was actually asking. You're not misunderstanding the content, you're probably just moving too fast in the exam room.

I failed P1 first time round and honestly the shift that helped me most was stopping trying to "understand" questions and starting to actively dissect the examiner's logic. After my fail I went back through every past paper question I got wrong and wrote out in my own words what the question was actually testing, not just what the topic was. It sounds tedious but you start to see patterns in how they phrase consolidation adjustments and it clicks differently than just reading the textbook.

For group accounts specifically, I didn't touch a single new question until I'd drilled the basic proforma until I could do it without thinking. It's boring but it frees up your brain for the tricky bits. You're at 54% which means you're close, the gap between that and a pass isn't more knowledge, it's probably exam technique and time pressure. Try timed question practice under exam conditions rather than sitting with a textbook next to you, it changed how I performed completely.