CBN CBN Value Creation & Claiming 5 β Questions and Answers
Question 1: Which negotiation behavior most directly undermines value creation in multi-issue talks?
- Treating each issue as a separate, sequential zero-sum battle (Correct answer)
- Making multiple-issue package offers simultaneously
- Sharing information about priorities with the counterpart
- Using objective criteria to evaluate trade-offs
Correct answer: Treating each issue as a separate, sequential zero-sum battle
Issue-by-issue bargaining destroys integrative potential by preventing cross-issue trade-offs that create joint gains.
Question 2: A buyer and supplier have different discount rates (the buyer values future cash more than the supplier does). A skilled CBN candidate would recommend:
- Structuring payment terms so the buyer pays later and the supplier receives more total value (Correct answer)
- Splitting the difference on price and moving on
- Asking a neutral third party to set the payment schedule
- Avoiding payment-timing discussions to prevent conflict
Correct answer: Structuring payment terms so the buyer pays later and the supplier receives more total value
Differing time preferences are a value-creation opportunity: delayed payment costs the buyer little but is worth more to a supplier with a lower discount rate.
Question 3: The concept of 'logrolling' in negotiation involves:
- Trading concessions on issues each party cares about differently (Correct answer)
- Revealing your bottom line to gain credibility
- Using competitive anchoring to claim more value
- Walking away from the table to signal resolve
Correct answer: Trading concessions on issues each party cares about differently
Logrolling means conceding on issues you care about less in exchange for gains on issues you care about more, creating mutual benefit.
Question 4: Which statement about anchoring in value-claiming is most accurate?
- The first number stated in a negotiation disproportionately influences the final outcome (Correct answer)
- Anchoring only works when the counterpart lacks market knowledge
- Counter-offers immediately neutralize any anchoring effect
- Anchoring is unethical and should never be used in business negotiations
Correct answer: The first number stated in a negotiation disproportionately influences the final outcome
Research consistently shows that first offers anchor subsequent discussion, pulling final agreements toward the opening number.
Question 5: When a negotiator uses 'multiple equivalent simultaneous offers' (MESOs), the key advantage is:
- Gathering information about the counterpart's preferences without directly asking (Correct answer)
- Locking in the highest-value outcome before discussion begins
- Eliminating the need for concessions entirely
- Signaling flexibility while maintaining a strong positional stance
Correct answer: Gathering information about the counterpart's preferences without directly asking
MESOs reveal which issues the counterpart values most based on which package they prefer or reject, enabling better integrative trades.
Question 6: A negotiator is facing a counterpart who is extremely competitive and focused purely on price. The best value-creation approach is to:
- Introduce non-price issues (delivery, warranty, exclusivity) to build a tradeable package (Correct answer)
- Match the competitive posture and focus solely on price as well
- End the negotiation and seek a different counterpart
- Immediately reveal your reservation price to demonstrate good faith
Correct answer: Introduce non-price issues (delivery, warranty, exclusivity) to build a tradeable package
Introducing additional issues transforms a single-issue distributive battle into a multi-issue negotiation where integrative trades become possible.
Question 7: In value-claiming, 'concession patterns' matter because:
- Rapidly decreasing concession sizes signal that you are approaching your reservation price (Correct answer)
- Consistent equal concessions maximize joint gains
- Large early concessions demonstrate trustworthiness and close deals faster
- Concession patterns have no strategic significance in professional negotiations
Correct answer: Rapidly decreasing concession sizes signal that you are approaching your reservation price
A pattern of diminishing concessions signals your limit is near, reducing pressure for further movement and protecting your claimed share.
Which negotiation behavior most directly undermines value creation in multi-issue talks?