CAIA Liability and Negligence Principles 2 — Questions and Answers
Question 1: Which legal doctrine holds an employer responsible for the negligent acts of an employee committed within the scope of employment?
- Res ipsa loquitur
- Vicarious liability (Correct answer)
- Contributory negligence
- Assumption of risk
Correct answer: Vicarious liability
Vicarious liability (respondeat superior) makes an employer legally responsible for torts committed by employees acting within the course of their employment.
Question 2: A driver rear-ends another vehicle while texting. The injured party was not wearing a seatbelt, increasing their injuries. Under pure comparative fault, how is the non-seatbelt factor treated?
- It bars recovery entirely
- It reduces the plaintiff's damages proportionally (Correct answer)
- It shifts all liability to the plaintiff
- It has no effect on the award
Correct answer: It reduces the plaintiff's damages proportionally
Under pure comparative fault, each party's negligence is assigned a percentage, and the plaintiff's award is reduced by their share of fault, including failure to wear a seatbelt.
Question 3: What does 'proximate cause' require in a negligence claim?
- That the defendant intended to cause harm
- That the harm was a foreseeable result of the defendant's conduct (Correct answer)
- That the plaintiff suffered economic loss only
- That multiple defendants acted jointly
Correct answer: That the harm was a foreseeable result of the defendant's conduct
Proximate cause requires that the plaintiff's injury was a reasonably foreseeable consequence of the defendant's negligent act.
Question 4: An adjuster is evaluating a claim where the at-fault driver was operating a company vehicle on a personal errand. Which doctrine most limits the employer's liability?
- Frolic and detour doctrine (Correct answer)
- Joint enterprise doctrine
- Negligent entrustment doctrine
- Last clear chance doctrine
Correct answer: Frolic and detour doctrine
The frolic and detour doctrine limits or eliminates employer liability when an employee deviates from work duties for personal purposes.
Question 5: In states applying the 'modified comparative fault – 51% bar rule,' a plaintiff who is found 55% at fault for an accident will:
- Recover 45% of damages
- Recover nothing (Correct answer)
- Recover full damages minus defendant's 45%
- Recover 55% of damages
Correct answer: Recover nothing
Under the 51% bar rule, a plaintiff who is more than 50% at fault is completely barred from recovering any damages.
Question 6: Which element of negligence requires the defendant to have owed a legal obligation to protect the plaintiff from unreasonable risk of harm?
- Breach
- Causation
- Duty (Correct answer)
- Damages
Correct answer: Duty
Duty is the first element of negligence and refers to the legal obligation a person owes to others to act with reasonable care.
Question 7: A pedestrian darts into traffic unexpectedly and is struck by a vehicle. The driver had a last opportunity to avoid the collision but failed to brake. Which doctrine may allow the pedestrian to recover despite their own negligence?
- Assumption of risk
- Last clear chance (Correct answer)
- Res ipsa loquitur
- Strict liability
Correct answer: Last clear chance
The last clear chance doctrine allows a plaintiff who was also negligent to recover if the defendant had a final opportunity to avoid the accident and failed to take it.
Which legal doctrine holds an employer responsible for the negligent acts of an employee committed within the scope of employment?